Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: George Zimmerman's Acquittal: Four Blunt Observations [View all]Vattel
(9,289 posts)46. Was Zimmerman at fault for shooting Martin?
If Martin attacked him and tried to slam his head into the sidewalk, then I don't see why Zimmerman would be at fault. I guess that the author of this piece, like so many others, pretends that he knows that Martin didn't assault Zimmerman as Zimmerman was trying to return to his car.
The author also makes the incorrect claim that the "police dispatcher told Zimmerman to stay in his car."
Of course, this case was never about evidence and facts.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Actually, I believe the jury disagreed with your point. Stand Your Ground laws have
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#31
Civil suit: This is where the laws passed with stand your ground do mean something...
dkf
Jul 2013
#2
If he was any good as a Neighborhood Watch person, he would have stayed in his car.
dmr
Jul 2013
#17
Why isn't the fact that Z was taking amphetamines (adderall) getting more interest? nt
Bigmack
Jul 2013
#4
the next step is a civil rights conviction and a 20 year sentence for zimmerman.
Dustin DeWinde
Jul 2013
#7
"yet so blithely comment he should get no prison time" = wtf are you talking about?
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#32
funny that the martins are planning to file a civil suit then, and funny that the zims are worried
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#16
the point is that i'm sick of your bullshit, dkf, & 'bullshit' is all i feel you deserve by way of
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#25
If the judge is not a racist asshole then he or she will allow the suit to move forward
Bjorn Against
Jul 2013
#42
for anyone with a functioning brain, the implicit message when a police dispatcher tells you
HiPointDem
Aug 2013
#48
no, no legal obligation; but only an idiot would try to claim that the message was something
HiPointDem
Aug 2013
#53
being an irresponsible small-dicked idiot may be enough to lose a civil suit, though.
HiPointDem
Aug 2013
#55