Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The VERY STRONG CASE for IMPEACHING Clarence Thomas [View all]reusrename
(1,716 posts)46. This should be THE issue for the midterms.
The way Republicans won the House was by creating national issues.
This is a national issue. The public will respond. Turnout will higher if folks know the stakes.
This issue is what the midterms should be fought over, whether we win or lose on actual impeachment.
Am I looking at this wrong?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think this is old news, but as you can see congress seems unmotivated to act.
geckosfeet
Jul 2013
#1
! I think you may have something there. Or whoever advised him to 'discreetly omit data'
geckosfeet
Jul 2013
#21
Right. But Abe Fortas was forced to resign, over way less money than Thomas was hiding. nt.
Mc Mike
Aug 2013
#26
Ok I can top that. I know all cats have more smarts, sense, and scruples.
A Simple Game
Jul 2013
#10
Not wimpy so much as unwilling to start a process that might get loose
Egalitarian Thug
Aug 2013
#27
***EXACTLY*** USSCJ have been impeached for MUCH less than Scalia and Thomas have done
uponit7771
Aug 2013
#40