Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

reusrename

(1,716 posts)
157. As you have been told many times now, no one is making that claim.
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 08:11 PM
Aug 2013

Nice strawman.

What folks are saying is that a warrant isn't required first, BEFORE peeking.

What folks are saying is that a warrant is automatically issued AFTER peeking.

This is what Snowden has claimed, this is what the law allows, and AFAICT this is how the policy has been implemented.

No one is saying this is being done without a warrant, they are saying that the warrant is automatically issued by the FISA court after the fact.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

More scare-mongering to sell eyeballs. randome Aug 2013 #1
That's just not true ^^ bl968 Aug 2013 #4
+1000 nenagh Aug 2013 #9
I totally agree newfie11 Aug 2013 #16
What shows that they are "gathering every communication they can get their fingers on both foreign" randome Aug 2013 #24
All information to date! Obstinate denial will not make the facts go away,. Civilization2 Aug 2013 #41
Instead of railing at me, why not point me to evidence... randome Aug 2013 #45
I merely point out that logic and reason, coupled with an even cursory look at history,. Civilization2 Aug 2013 #63
What 'big gun'? Every LE agency can abuse their authority. randome Aug 2013 #69
That is my point, why would we want to wait until there is evidence, get rid of the gun! Civilization2 Aug 2013 #74
They used against Verizon customers, like me. I have spoken to Verizon who are trying to deny sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #143
It's not just Verizon GiaGiovanni Aug 2013 #144
I know, but radome implied there was no proof of these allegations. We have verification from sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #147
Oh, gotcha GiaGiovanni Aug 2013 #149
Every single business on Earth will likely comply with a legal warrant. randome Aug 2013 #160
And where was the warrant for them to stalk me and my phone, internet and email habits? sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #170
Crickets... JEB Aug 2013 #174
Business records are not your property. You already know that. randome Aug 2013 #179
Michelle Bachman is not a person I would be quoting around here, in fact anywhere. That sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #181
I asked you and I asked Verizon, 'where is this warrant'? You need to talk to them, they deny sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #182
.... questionseverything Aug 2013 #184
Your premise is that we minions COULD have the evidence needed to prove the lie peacebird Aug 2013 #177
current admin questionseverything Aug 2013 #185
Because you would stand on top of the mountain of evidence and scan the horizon looking for proof. RC Aug 2013 #77
So point. randome Aug 2013 #86
ok mrdmk Aug 2013 #136
Why do pointers always point to their crotch? I've never understood that. randome Aug 2013 #138
Because they watch too many hip hop videos? awoke_in_2003 Aug 2013 #163
more? bl968 Aug 2013 #51
One is a legal warrant. And metadata records are not 'all communications'. randome Aug 2013 #56
Once upon a time, in a place far, far away... RC Aug 2013 #81
I am pushing no one's 'line'. randome Aug 2013 #87
All you need to do is look down at your feet. The evidence is all around you. RC Aug 2013 #93
You should pick one side of your mouth to talk out of. reusrename Aug 2013 #132
You should comprehend better... ConservativeDemocrat Aug 2013 #154
As you have been told many times now, no one is making that claim. reusrename Aug 2013 #157
It's legal to have the metadata. Why is that so hard to understand? randome Aug 2013 #161
Everything except lying to Congress is considered legal by secret courts. reusrename Aug 2013 #172
Yes you are. DisgustipatedinCA Aug 2013 #168
Please become aware that truedelphi Aug 2013 #119
His purpose is to "catapult the propaganda" rusty fender Aug 2013 #125
true dat,. Civilization2 Aug 2013 #152
Recommend Read of "bl968" KoKo Aug 2013 #55
Rec AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2013 #71
not true ? kardonb Aug 2013 #166
Which "you people" are you referring to? cyberswede Aug 2013 #195
"is to be used" does not mean "only used" Pholus Aug 2013 #7
Foreign communications are not subject to our Constitution. randome Aug 2013 #25
So you agree that domestic communications are then. Pholus Aug 2013 #31
If you tap a suspect's phone, you can't 'unhear' the person on the other end. randome Aug 2013 #32
Yes and the corporate-military petrodollar-right does not think global warming is happening,. Civilization2 Aug 2013 #42
More Denials To Deflect From The Truth cantbeserious Aug 2013 #18
No denials. Questions and postions. Engage if you wish. I can be convinced of anything. randome Aug 2013 #26
randome masoncharest Aug 2013 #186
Yep. AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2013 #72
Randome deflections, randome confusion, hueymahl Aug 2013 #34
It's pronounced 'RAN-doh-may'. For future reference. randome Aug 2013 #44
RAN-doh-may pronunciation nt wtmusic Aug 2013 #96
"The security state’s defenders won’t stop lying." Tell me about it! Civilization2 Aug 2013 #38
They are prohibited from using such software on American citizens' data. randome Aug 2013 #43
How about this... bl968 Aug 2013 #46
Plenty of DU telecommunications experts have pointed out this is nothing. randome Aug 2013 #65
Reality disagrees with you LondonReign2 Aug 2013 #49
Software that is used to parse through enormous volumes of foreign communications data. randome Aug 2013 #61
Randome disidoro01 Aug 2013 #101
I do understand that. randome Aug 2013 #105
You don't know? disidoro01 Aug 2013 #106
I don't know the procedures they have in place. I have no idea. randome Aug 2013 #108
Good grief disidoro01 Aug 2013 #111
I do not believe they collect all information on everyone. randome Aug 2013 #124
Evidence? Civilization2 Aug 2013 #153
Engineering drawings, photographs, doctoral thesis, none of that is evidence. reusrename Aug 2013 #158
lol, there are prohibitions of pot smoking, so no one has ever smoked pot? Civilization2 Aug 2013 #50
What 'crushing'? Police battling Occupiers in public parks? randome Aug 2013 #67
There is a long history of CRUSHING dissent in the good ol' US of A,. look into it, I suggest; Civilization2 Aug 2013 #73
NSA does more than hunt for terrorists. randome Aug 2013 #75
Yea, like the US having the A-bomb would be big plus for so many things nolabels Aug 2013 #76
Focus on the OP, please. randome Aug 2013 #89
Not that checks and balance happens but at least it is out in the open nolabels Aug 2013 #118
That's why I think the best thing to come out of the Snowden Affair... randome Aug 2013 #127
With all the phone calls and E-mails, going in and out of the country and Internet RC Aug 2013 #90
A 'known fact', huh? Kindly point me to this fact. And I don't mean another vague fear or allegation randome Aug 2013 #94
Why? You keep ignoring the evidence. RC Aug 2013 #98
Oh, and you may want to look at this LondonReign2 Aug 2013 #57
Right. Evidence that oversight works is evidence that oversight does not work? randome Aug 2013 #62
I fucking give up LondonReign2 Aug 2013 #79
When did you get the idea that all LE agencies operate perfectly? randome Aug 2013 #91
This is how it gets attention. By definition, nothing you can say will be good enough for Randome DisgustipatedinCA Aug 2013 #169
The naivete, she hurts. WinkyDink Aug 2013 #80
We need to see evidence that they are not illegally spying. That's a reasonable request since THEY rhett o rick Aug 2013 #116
I have no idea what Wyden means when he says that. We should know. randome Aug 2013 #128
NSA walks into a bar... KurtNYC Aug 2013 #126
good one,. when they look at everyone as the potential enemy all is possible,. Civilization2 Aug 2013 #155
What makes you think this is prohibited? reusrename Aug 2013 #175
+1 LondonReign2 Aug 2013 #47
I wish I could recommend this post 100,000 times!!! Major Hogwash Aug 2013 #68
The stupid, it is strong with you Cronus Protagonist Aug 2013 #70
It's easy to us prove wrong. Go on Google and do a seach for "B omb" "Te rr orist" Katashi_itto Aug 2013 #88
Probably not a good idea to do at work. Actually, DU is not a good idea at work. randome Aug 2013 #95
Yes it is that simple. Go do it. Katashi_itto Aug 2013 #97
Yeah, about those stories... randome Aug 2013 #176
At this point maybe. Katashi_itto Aug 2013 #183
Are you really that naive? Bake Aug 2013 #107
Hell, no, you don't trust them! randome Aug 2013 #139
Please post something that proves your opinion. sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #141
Nothing prevents LE agencies from abusing their authority. Nothing. randome Aug 2013 #159
Incorrect Lonr Aug 2013 #164
Text of the 4th Amendment Lonr Aug 2013 #165
How many times does this need to be pointed out? randome Aug 2013 #173
EVIDENCE!!1111 SLOBBER!!11! morningfog Aug 2013 #178
K&R for DNI Presenter Fire Walk With Me Aug 2013 #2
Slide 15: anyone who uses strong encryption = suspect. joshcryer Aug 2013 #3
Correction -- even *more* of a suspect. Pholus Aug 2013 #5
True, true. joshcryer Aug 2013 #6
What we've seen is sufficient.... Pholus Aug 2013 #8
Possibly show how they captured someone. joshcryer Aug 2013 #10
It's cyberwar! Pholus Aug 2013 #12
Indeed it is. joshcryer Aug 2013 #13
"The security state’s defenders won’t stop lying." chimpymustgo Aug 2013 #11
Snowden cries wolf again. nt Progressive dog Aug 2013 #14
Are you saying the slides are made up? joshcryer Aug 2013 #15
The power point slides are real, Progressive dog Aug 2013 #17
Deniers Cry Because The Truth Hurts cantbeserious Aug 2013 #19
Snowden cries wolf again and nobody comes. nt Progressive dog Aug 2013 #20
Deniers Deny Because That's All That Can Be Done cantbeserious Aug 2013 #21
Not believing an airport dweller is not denial, Progressive dog Aug 2013 #22
Denial Is Irrational cantbeserious Aug 2013 #27
"an airport dweller"... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #99
He's been promoted to Moscow Eddie Progressive dog Aug 2013 #100
In which DU user "Progressive dog"... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #104
Snowden's employment history: US Special Forces (2004) KurtNYC Aug 2013 #137
No longer airport dweller, he moved to Moscow itself Progressive dog Aug 2013 #140
Sen Wyden says that Snowden is revealing what he, Wyden could not. Do you think Sen Wyden is lying? rhett o rick Aug 2013 #117
I tried to keep my post short and simple Progressive dog Aug 2013 #120
Do you think that Sen Wyden is a conspiracy theorist? Do you think he is lying when he says that rhett o rick Aug 2013 #123
I believe that the President is telling the truth, Progressive dog Aug 2013 #130
Are Wyden and Conyers lying? sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #191
It's a shame Turbineguy Aug 2013 #23
You think he was sending emails? djean111 Aug 2013 #29
Does anyone seriously believe that internet "privacy" ever existed in the first place? Orrex Aug 2013 #28
Compared to what it was when it became a public venue to today? westerebus Aug 2013 #48
What's my phone number? usGovOwesUs3Trillion Aug 2013 #82
Maybe not. But I sure as hell never expected the post office to go matthews Aug 2013 #92
What is missing in this discussion is the idea that they collect everything in ADVANCE, not after on point Aug 2013 #30
Exactly! It is no different than what the FBI used to do . . . hueymahl Aug 2013 #37
Bingo! nt snappyturtle Aug 2013 #39
Except they don't call it *collected* until they need it lol Catherina Aug 2013 #58
Yes I've been saying this since the story broke bobduca Aug 2013 #59
What is also missing in this discussion is how the Republicans abuse this capability to spy on Dems Coyotl Aug 2013 #66
Memory Hole: Republican Staffers Hacked Congressional Servers. mrdmk Aug 2013 #145
Hateful scaremongering intaglio Aug 2013 #33
thank you - even the fact there is such encryption software treestar Aug 2013 #36
LOL LondonReign2 Aug 2013 #54
This from a person who on the evidence of a previous thread intaglio Aug 2013 #109
I wasn't the one trying to make the case on that thread LondonReign2 Aug 2013 #112
this nauseating post contains nothing but false hoods usGovOwesUs3Trillion Aug 2013 #83
and true intaglio Aug 2013 #110
Sadly, they are DU's very own "Limbaugh Brigade" maxrandb Aug 2013 #85
"conspiracy nuts" and "haters of the administration"... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #102
This "conversation" was degraded by a false and misleading misleading OP intaglio Aug 2013 #113
Okay, so your primary concern seems to be... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #114
No, my primary concerns are the falsehoods being peddled by these scammers intaglio Aug 2013 #115
What a prevaricating paragraph! Pholus Aug 2013 #103
OK, have someone take it to court intaglio Aug 2013 #133
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. westerebus Aug 2013 #151
Facile, and something the Lords Resistance Army would applaud. intaglio Aug 2013 #187
I was thinking George Washington. westerebus Aug 2013 #189
Begin and his associates were terrorists intaglio Aug 2013 #190
Seems I've hit a nerve. westerebus Aug 2013 #192
No, not a nerve, just laughter at your ignorance of history intaglio Aug 2013 #193
but your (my) conclusions are correct. westerebus Aug 2013 #194
I think you do overlook the 9th Amendment here. Pholus Aug 2013 #167
"The outrage is long past due". That is the point and demonstrates this whole argument Egalitarian Thug Aug 2013 #180
Problem with 9A is surely its generality intaglio Aug 2013 #188
Are you afraid that these revelations will shake your trust in the government? rhett o rick Aug 2013 #122
No one is terrified treestar Aug 2013 #35
"The security state’s defenders won’t stop lying" even here on DU MNBrewer Aug 2013 #40
thanks for posting this warrprayer Aug 2013 #52
Boils down to this: Democracy or Tyranny. Octafish Aug 2013 #53
This message was self-deleted by its author mother earth Aug 2013 #60
K & R !!! WillyT Aug 2013 #64
MULTI-millions of us ought to declare one day "E-mail Nothing But 'F*** YOU!' Day." WinkyDink Aug 2013 #78
Trust our government ..LMFAO ..only it's not funny anymore. They lied us into a war. End of story? L0oniX Aug 2013 #84
+ 1. n/t truedelphi Aug 2013 #121
One slight quibble dreamnightwind Aug 2013 #134
Not one defender of these surveillance programs felix_numinous Aug 2013 #129
My spouse and I were watching the excellent movie truedelphi Aug 2013 #131
Very excellent documentary. Blue_In_AK Aug 2013 #142
Yep, and I thought that the woman Scandinavian Cinematographer was truedelphi Aug 2013 #146
I agree. Blue_In_AK Aug 2013 #148
"There is no judicial process to push back." GiaGiovanni Aug 2013 #135
They buried the lede: DeSwiss Aug 2013 #150
"XKeyscore is to be used on foreign suspects only. " Maedhros Aug 2013 #156
knr Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #162
Symbols like crosshairs from Palin’s campaign graphics are a dead giveaway polynomial Aug 2013 #171
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»3 Shocking Revelations fr...»Reply #157