Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What remains unchanged or has worsened under Obama? [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)36. My current list isn't as long.
It's going to take time to reverse a decades-old trend, and especially in the aftermath of an economic crisis that exploded the problems.
<...>
Perhaps the best prism through which to see the Democrats gains is inequality. In the 2008 campaign, Mr. Obama said that his top priority as president would be to create bottom-up economic growth and reduce inequality...In the 2009 stimulus, he insisted on making tax credits fully refundable, so that even people who did not make enough to pay much federal tax would benefit. The 2010 health care law overhaul was probably the biggest attack on inequality since it began rising in the 1970s, increasing taxes on businesses and the rich to pay for health insurance largely for the middle class.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/03/us/politics/for-obama-fiscal-deal-is-a-victory-that-also-holds-risks.html
Perhaps the best prism through which to see the Democrats gains is inequality. In the 2008 campaign, Mr. Obama said that his top priority as president would be to create bottom-up economic growth and reduce inequality...In the 2009 stimulus, he insisted on making tax credits fully refundable, so that even people who did not make enough to pay much federal tax would benefit. The 2010 health care law overhaul was probably the biggest attack on inequality since it began rising in the 1970s, increasing taxes on businesses and the rich to pay for health insurance largely for the middle class.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/03/us/politics/for-obama-fiscal-deal-is-a-victory-that-also-holds-risks.html
Krugman: Obama and Redistribution
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022224304
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau gets busy
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023372682
Also as the health care becomes more accessible and affordable, and the effects will become even more noticeable.
The data presented here are from the Current Population Survey (CPS), 2012 Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC), the source of official poverty estimates. The CPS ASEC is a sample survey of approximately 100,000 household nationwide. These data reflect conditions in calendar year 2011.
- In 2011, the official poverty rate was 15.0 percent. There were 46.2 million people in poverty.
- After 3 consecutive years of increases, neither the official poverty rate nor the number of people in poverty were statisti¬cally different from the 2010 estimates1
- The 2011 poverty rates for most demographic groups examined were not statistically different from their 2010 rates. Poverty rates were lower in 2011 than in 2010 for six groups: Hispanics, males, the foreign-born, nonciti¬zens, people living in the South, and people living inside metropol¬itan statistical areas but outside principal cities. Poverty rates went up between 2010 and 2011 for naturalized citizens.
- For most groups, the number of people in poverty either decreased or did not show a statistically significant change. The number of people in poverty decreased for noncitizens, people living in the South, and people living inside metropolitan statistical areas but outside principal cities between 2010 and 2011. The number of naturalized citizens in poverty increased.
- The poverty rate in 2011 for chil¬dren under age 18 was 21.9 per-cent. The poverty rate for people aged 18 to 64 was 13.7 percent, while the rate for people aged 65 and older was 8.7 percent. None of the rates for these age groups were statistically different from their 2010 estimates.2
Go to the "Publications" tab for more information.
Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2011
http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/income_wealth/cb12-172.html
Sex
Health Insurance Coverage
http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/income_wealth/cb12-172.html
- The poverty rate for males decreased between 2010 and 2011, from 14.0 percent to 13.6 percent, while the poverty rate for females was 16.3 percent, not statistically different from the 2010 estimate.
Health Insurance Coverage
- The number of people with health insurance increased to 260.2 million in 2011 from 256.6 million in 2010, as did the percentage of people with health insurance (84.3 percent in 2011, 83.7 percent in 2010).
- The percentage of people covered by private health insurance in 2011 was not statistically different from 2010, at 63.9 percent. This was the first time in the last 10 years that the rate of private health insurance coverage has not decreased. The percentage covered by employment-based health insurance in 2011 was not statistically different from 2010, at 55.1 percent.
- The percentage of people covered by government health insurance increased from 31.2 percent to 32.2 percent. The percentage covered by Medicaid increased from 15.8 percent in 2010 to 16.5 percent in 2011. The percentage covered by Medicare also rose over the period, from 14.6 percent to 15.2 percent. The percentage covered by Medicaid in 2011 was higher than the percentage covered by Medicare.
- In 2011, 9.7 percent of children under 19 (7.6 million) were without health insurance. Neither estimate is significantly different from the corresponding 2010 estimate. The uninsured rate also remained statistically unchanged for those age 26 to 34 and people age 45 to 64. It declined, however, for people age 19 to 25, age 35 to 44 and those age 65 and older.
- The uninsured rate for children in poverty (13.8 percent) was higher than the rate for all children (9.4 percent).
- In 2011, the uninsured rates decreased as household income increased from 25.4 percent for those in households with annual income less than $25,000 to 7.8 percent in households with income of $75,000 or more.
<...>
http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/income_wealth/cb12-172.html
Dire information, but I would say a decrease in the poverty rate among most groups between 2010 and 2011 is big news, as is the information on health insurance coverage.
Single Payer movement in the era of Obamacare
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023372091
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
242 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I just Googled "Los Angeles iWatch and Special Order 11" and got a CREEPY reply:
NYC_SKP
Aug 2013
#2
Damn! I've added a section to the end of the OP regarding the surveillance state and police...
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#24
The fact that he's appointed a couple of good old boys from Monsanto for food and ag policy...
drokhole
Aug 2013
#59
It doesn't seem to matter what positions people had before, they are very flexible and can
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#55
Why do you so predictably feel a need to characterize what was an entirely FACTUAL post?
MADem
Aug 2013
#135
I want to memorialize your bad behavior, in case embarrassment moves you to delete such a
MADem
Aug 2013
#149
Give it up. We were not bigfooting all over the place. Our charge in Pakistan was
MADem
Aug 2013
#159
You complain about the phrase "bigfooting around" and finally admit you don't know what it means.
MADem
Aug 2013
#177
When she writes her "Factual Proof Thread" to explain that the ISI is in possession of the
Dragonfli
Aug 2013
#206
I don't "take a simple view" of anything. Please have a look at the context of the
MADem
Aug 2013
#148
If you can't bother to read what I write, without overlaying your dire imaginings over
MADem
Aug 2013
#160
Nah, I drink it black and hot. I just need to put it down before I laugh (G) n/t
jtuck004
Aug 2013
#205
You are very correct. Many places where schools are being closed are now funding multi-million
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#32
No. Those he had nothing to do with and assume it only made the list because feds ignore the federal
Dragonfli
Aug 2013
#105
Very much so, very good points which I've missed. For me, it is about Obama doing nothing to
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#226
Here is an example of what Obama did for a piece of legislation, versus "why doesn't he do similar
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#230
Of all the rationalizations for "It's not Obama's fault", that is one of best. Not a dictator.
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#170
Sadly, he's not even a President, he's a corporate spokesperson for the ultra rich.
grahamhgreen
Aug 2013
#182
They dont want to discuss anything other than, "It's not Obama's fault." THat's all they got.
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#172
They think he has no power to choose appointments or policies under his executive purvue
Dragonfli
Aug 2013
#25
When you say, "this is false", does the "this" refer to your own post? If so, I agree. nm
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#173
Civil rights and an expanded safety net for millions is not fodder for snark. n/t
ProSense
Aug 2013
#40
For when the inevitable backlash comes, I'd like to offer you this thought...
rwsanders
Aug 2013
#27
I think the, "It could have been worse" argument is the bottom of the barrel.
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#176
The post says it happened under the Obama administration, not that the administration was to blame.
Billy Pilgrim
Aug 2013
#51
Although my post is general, it IS to call Obama into direct question. Please to read:
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#84
Obama is also responsible for the work of ALEC in red states ... apparently.
JoePhilly
Aug 2013
#127
So now we're blaming Obama for Citizens United? Hell, let's also blame him for the Iraq War...
Drunken Irishman
Aug 2013
#52
"Citizens United" falls under the "remains unchanged" (WHY!?) aspect of the thread title. n/t
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#88
"Citizens United" was given lip service at the DNC and AFAIK, absolutely nothing sice. Obama could
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#212
Don't attack me. I said AFAIK and I did not watch the SOTU address because I can't stand to look or
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#224
I'll attack you as I please when you make accusations without backing 'em up...
Drunken Irishman
Aug 2013
#238
"The Tea Party makes about as much sense as this OP." They're also incapable of seeing that
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#218
All those facts, easily cross-checkable from "legit" sources, sway you not one whit?
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#82
The ones that applaud a Republican cabinet - blue dog third way Reagan Democrats that
Dragonfli
Aug 2013
#75
The OP and her ilk vote AGAINST Republicans and Republican policies. read my post I know you didn't
Dragonfli
Aug 2013
#77
No, only in your mind, only an idiot would think someone who attacks Bush's policies and
Dragonfli
Aug 2013
#81
I so agree. Some here have absolutely nothing to add but, "It's not Obama's fault." nm
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#179
Obama isn't mentioned that often except by those who want to 'take him down a peg'.
randome
Aug 2013
#195
You and your friends never, ever discuss issues unless you are defending your lord and savior.
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#204
It Is Not About Race! It's about actions similar to Bush, extensions of the Bush agenda.
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#80
Yeah, uh-huh. Yeah! Obama is just like Bush. Got it. Trashed thread. No need to reply.
Liberal_Stalwart71
Aug 2013
#106
And obviously, no need to consider the facts at hand. Good luck with that position. n/t
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#211
It's called The Black Tax. Amazing the same standards were never applied to Bill Clinton.
Liberal_Stalwart71
Aug 2013
#200
This one's strange "logic" has convinced him/her that anyone that opposes the continuation
Dragonfli
Aug 2013
#107
All of it is true. Thank you for striving to find out for yourself instead of simply calling my OP
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#233
This post was so bad that just the first two rows of the Amen chorus showed up to rec it
Number23
Aug 2013
#194
Some of it was cut-and-pasted from a list over a year old, which should alarm anyone
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#220
Look, I understand the separation of powers. My point is Obama does nothing about these serious
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#232
Thank you. And sorry to pick nits but due to the depth of its importance I wished to mention
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#217
I see. Questioning the president and the state of the nation is "Obama hate". That means we should
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#214
Seattle police wanted to experiment with using drones for surveillance. The people
liberal_at_heart
Aug 2013
#147
I, for one, can not recommend enough.The fact that this is on the front page should
grahamhgreen
Aug 2013
#181
You're welcome and thank you for the reply. Obviously, the enemies of critical thought are
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#215
If you read the thread title, "Citizens United" REMAINS UNCHANGED UNDER OBAMA.
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#213
Seriously? This is the second time someone has attempted to promote the concept that Obama
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#236