Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
47. The Hong Kong Eddie Caper didn't start "a little over 2 months ago." Today is August 1st, yet . . .
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 11:36 PM
Aug 2013

. . . the first published report on Snowden occurred on June 5th.
And that's not "a little over 2 months ago".


20 May Edward Snowden, an employee of defence contractor Booz Allen Hamilton at the National Security Agency, arrives in Hong Kong from Hawaii. He carries four laptop computers that enable him to gain access to some of the US government's most highly-classified secrets.

1 June Guardian journalists Glenn Greenwald and Ewen MacAskill and documentary maker Laura Poitras fly from New York to Hong Kong. They meet Snowden in a Kowloon hotel after he identifies himself with a Rubik's cube and begin a week of interviews with their source.

5 June The Guardian publishes its first exclusive based on Snowden's leak, revealing a secret court order showing that the US government had forced the telecoms giant Verizon to hand over the phone records of millions of Americans.

6 June A second story reveals the existence of the previously undisclosed programme Prism, which internal NSA documents claim gives the agency "direct access" to data held by Google, Facebook, Apple and other US internet giants. The tech companies deny that they have set up "back door access" to their systems for the US government.


This, according to the 'official" timeline provided by the Guardian itself --
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/23/edward-snowden-nsa-files-timeline

I wonder why Wyden is grandstanding now, since he was on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and knew this was all going on to begin with.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kick! n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #1
Pathetic. n-t Logical Jul 2013 #3
Thanks for kicking the thread. ProSense Jul 2013 #4
K krawhitham Jul 2013 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author DevonRex Jul 2013 #15
K & R Scurrilous Jul 2013 #2
Thanks. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #5
Kicking your own thread when no one has posted Harmony Blue Jul 2013 #6
She does it all the time. Waits about 30 minutes. Then kicks it since it is being ignored. n-t Logical Jul 2013 #7
Well, let's have a discussion about kicking threads. ProSense Jul 2013 #11
No one else does it but you. No need for a discussion. n-t Logical Jul 2013 #12
Is your ProSense Jul 2013 #13
Obsession? cherokeeprogressive Jul 2013 #22
Holy shit. That's taking obsession to a new level. ProSense Jul 2013 #24
Took all of about five minutes. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2013 #29
It's creepy and pointless, and I'm very familiar with "advanced searches on DU" ProSense Jul 2013 #30
Not to mention, I didn't even post in that thread. ProSense Jul 2013 #25
....incapable of advocating for their own point of view on the merits? MADem Aug 2013 #58
You obviously have a personal problem with this poster. DevonRex Jul 2013 #16
You deleted your other post before I could read it. Darn! n-t Logical Jul 2013 #17
I said you were making DU suck but my arrows didn't look right. DevonRex Jul 2013 #19
Really, I am personally making the DU suck? Me? Not 1000 Snowden posts about the same thing? n-t Logical Jul 2013 #20
There's that obsession again, and ProSense Jul 2013 #21
This is a Mother Jones interview with Wyden. Very informative. DevonRex Jul 2013 #23
You'd never know it by the weird responses. ProSense Jul 2013 #26
Seriously. Now we have PSDS. ProSense Derangement Syndrome. DevonRex Jul 2013 #27
Your hands are not tied. Do you disagree with Wyden? nt MADem Aug 2013 #53
I love that you kick your own thread, ProSense.. so it doesn't get lost Cha Aug 2013 #49
I'm sure according to Snowden, the ends always justify the means. randome Jul 2013 #8
Snowden doesn't post on this board Harmony Blue Jul 2013 #10
I DON'T have a problem with this board. randome Jul 2013 #14
+1000 nt Andy823 Jul 2013 #28
Sorry, next time ProSense Jul 2013 #9
You have a personal problem with this poster, too. Nobody else cares. DevonRex Jul 2013 #18
Singling out someone for something others do as well is kinda lame... Violet_Crumble Aug 2013 #41
Net nannies area dime a dozen. Cha Aug 2013 #46
As a matter of fact, they come a dozen to a box. Major Hogwash Aug 2013 #48
They're so.. Cha Aug 2013 #50
So true. I never liked Vanilla ice cream very much, either. Major Hogwash Aug 2013 #51
THis post is more puke RetroLounge Jul 2013 #31
Why is a Mother Jones interview with Senator Wyden "puke"? DevonRex Jul 2013 #32
LOL! n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #33
Are they reading a completely different OP? The replies don't match DevonRex Jul 2013 #34
... RetroLounge Jul 2013 #37
Oh, you poor thing. Who knew Wyden would make you so ill. DevonRex Aug 2013 #38
... RetroLounge Aug 2013 #40
Hopefully you're not having DevonRex Aug 2013 #42
Snowden left the airport today RetroLounge Aug 2013 #43
Electrolytes. And call your doctor. DevonRex Aug 2013 #44
I'm touched by your concern RetroLounge Aug 2013 #45
How are we feeling today? DevonRex Aug 2013 #59
It's obvious the poster didn't read the interview, either that, or he works for the NSA MADem Aug 2013 #54
I figured out how to do a screen capture just for this thread. DevonRex Aug 2013 #56
By their words we shall know them! MADem Aug 2013 #57
My Favorite Quote. Savannahmann Jul 2013 #36
well said questionseverything Aug 2013 #55
Very informative post, thanks. Zorra Aug 2013 #39
The Hong Kong Eddie Caper didn't start "a little over 2 months ago." Today is August 1st, yet . . . Major Hogwash Aug 2013 #47
I don't think there are many people who would disagree with Wyden's take, regardless of MADem Aug 2013 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"[Sen. Wyden] on Edward S...»Reply #47