Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Amazing - Sweden has run out of trash [View all]HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)75. you need to do more research. the majority of 'free schools' are private, for-profit.
One of Swedens largest for-profit school networks plans to gain a toehold in American public schooling by managing its first charter school in New York City this Septembera possible sign of the times as U.S. educators and policymakers step up their focus on global competitiveness.
The transplantation process started with a name change, from the tongue-twisting Swedish Kunskapsskolan to Innovate Manhattan Charter School. The schools charter is held by an independent boarda nod to the citys restriction on for-profit companies directly owning or operating public schoolsbut Margaret Peg Hoey, the president of Kunskapsskolan USA, said the staff is working to ensure the core Swedish instructional model wont be lost in translation.
http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2011/02/09/20swedish_ep.h30.html
How Sweden Profits from For-Profit Schools
Over the past two decades, Sweden and the United States have tried to address that problem in very different ways with very different results. In the United States, philanthropists have donated hundreds of millions of dollars to replicate what they consider to be the best charter schools semi-independent government schools. Swedens free schools system, by contrast, has allowed both for-profit and non-profit private schools to compete for the privilege of serving students.
http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/how-sweden-profits-profit-schools
Swedens Vouchers Are Charter Schools
Swedish kids can attend are essentially what we call charter schools in the United States, rather than true private schools with selective admissions. In effect, Swedish practice is like what exists in American states (Arizona, for example) with lots of charter schools and its quite similar to what the Obama administration (and I) are pushing. The big difference is that for-profit operators are allowed to run schools in Sweden...
http://thinkprogress.org/yglesias/2010/10/05/198729/swedens-vouchers-are-charter-schools/
She said Sweden is a good example of how charter schools develop. For-profit companies are allowed to operate charter schools there and they make up a substantial proportion of the school system... The Swedish model means companies are able to pay dividends to shareholders. About 65 per cent of Swedish independent schools take this form, the report says, suggesting that precluding for-profit companies from the system would reduce new entrants.
"There is a reason why the majority of Swedish independent schools are for-profit: The idealism and drive of those running non-profit schools cannot serve as an incentive to start schools for many people otherwise perfectly capable of doing so. The simple reason is that idealism is scarce and local."
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/education/7994188/The-business-side-of-charter-schools
The transplantation process started with a name change, from the tongue-twisting Swedish Kunskapsskolan to Innovate Manhattan Charter School. The schools charter is held by an independent boarda nod to the citys restriction on for-profit companies directly owning or operating public schoolsbut Margaret Peg Hoey, the president of Kunskapsskolan USA, said the staff is working to ensure the core Swedish instructional model wont be lost in translation.
http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2011/02/09/20swedish_ep.h30.html
How Sweden Profits from For-Profit Schools
Over the past two decades, Sweden and the United States have tried to address that problem in very different ways with very different results. In the United States, philanthropists have donated hundreds of millions of dollars to replicate what they consider to be the best charter schools semi-independent government schools. Swedens free schools system, by contrast, has allowed both for-profit and non-profit private schools to compete for the privilege of serving students.
http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/how-sweden-profits-profit-schools
Swedens Vouchers Are Charter Schools
Swedish kids can attend are essentially what we call charter schools in the United States, rather than true private schools with selective admissions. In effect, Swedish practice is like what exists in American states (Arizona, for example) with lots of charter schools and its quite similar to what the Obama administration (and I) are pushing. The big difference is that for-profit operators are allowed to run schools in Sweden...
http://thinkprogress.org/yglesias/2010/10/05/198729/swedens-vouchers-are-charter-schools/
She said Sweden is a good example of how charter schools develop. For-profit companies are allowed to operate charter schools there and they make up a substantial proportion of the school system... The Swedish model means companies are able to pay dividends to shareholders. About 65 per cent of Swedish independent schools take this form, the report says, suggesting that precluding for-profit companies from the system would reduce new entrants.
"There is a reason why the majority of Swedish independent schools are for-profit: The idealism and drive of those running non-profit schools cannot serve as an incentive to start schools for many people otherwise perfectly capable of doing so. The simple reason is that idealism is scarce and local."
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/education/7994188/The-business-side-of-charter-schools
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Maybe thats my problem never owned one in fact I have never owned a car lol
Arcanetrance
Aug 2013
#24
I've heard the same about Jags which of course my dream car is one the XJ220
Arcanetrance
Aug 2013
#28
ha ha thanks I will stick with my great white horse, my mini Van. She's not p
Heather MC
Aug 2013
#83
It is like owning a fighter jet, since that's what the were originally created to produce.
Sirveri
Aug 2013
#36
If you get composting, its amazing how much that cuts into the garbage as well...
Salviati
Aug 2013
#18
The point being that energy should not be extractive. And needs to be generated as close to source
KittyWampus
Aug 2013
#16
Someone really needs to stop these anti-murican enviro socialist euro-trash burning hippie freaks.
Zorra
Aug 2013
#37
the swedes started privatizing their education system in the 90s. they were early adopters
HiPointDem
Aug 2013
#39
you need to do more research. the majority of 'free schools' are private, for-profit.
HiPointDem
Aug 2013
#75
But we were just assured that this cannot be because Sweden is a radical, far-left, idealistic
Egalitarian Thug
Aug 2013
#41
I'd like to know more about ALL the systems in the countries that are working better than ours,
snot
Aug 2013
#77