Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hell, I might as well say it, I used to work for the NSA [View all]tridim
(45,358 posts)76. EVERYTHING is "far more sophisticated" than it was 50 years ago.
I don't believe anything people say on the Internet without at least two verifiable sources of proof. Why do you?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
163 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"We have let the agency grow to monstrous capability." That is the problem exactly.
liberal_at_heart
Aug 2013
#2
We do know what they are up to today, thanks to the several Whistle Blowers who
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#137
I am afraid the PTB will run Clinton against Christie. At best you'll get four
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#140
The Freedom of Information Act fixed a lot of such problems with our government
Kolesar
Aug 2013
#51
Calling Snowden "Snowball" reflects on your credibility. But I guess that train already left the
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#139
most here are capable of dealing with both NSA spying and other issues such as budget
nashville_brook
Aug 2013
#149
50 years later and you still get briefings as to exactly what the NSA is doing today?
tridim
Aug 2013
#29
Silly because if you had read the posting with any comprehension you'd have seen ...
1-Old-Man
Aug 2013
#44
that awkward moment when your brain says -->> "No one thinks that." and, you're not on a RW site.
nashville_brook
Aug 2013
#81
So let's guess your point! Since the phones have changed the NSA wouldnt spy on us.
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#143
My point is the OP doesn't know anything more than anyone else about the NSA today.
tridim
Aug 2013
#155
In what way exactly will a passage of "restrictive laws" have any effect. Clapper lied to the Senate
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2013
#34
They arent as narrow focused as you. Why dont you just post, "It isnt Obama's fault." nm
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#145
Defending the Constitution is all Manning and Snowden are doing. Unlike those that persecute them.
grahamhgreen
Aug 2013
#40
Sadly the answer is quite obvious. For one reason or another someone wanted it to go forward.
Ford_Prefect
Aug 2013
#64
K&R Very few people have any idea just how far this kind of thing goes.
Egalitarian Thug
Aug 2013
#56
Frank Church warned us about the implications of using NSA technology on Americans in 1976.
Octafish
Aug 2013
#75
In the early 1970's I toured a phone company cable landing and briefly listened to an overseas call.
Piedras
Aug 2013
#84
Bravo to you..and to Snowden and Greenwald informing the world about the NSA. K&R
Tierra_y_Libertad
Aug 2013
#85
Thanks for starting this thread - you've already inspired some others to speak out too. nt
bananas
Aug 2013
#108
"We have a very rare opportunity taking place right now to look into that Agency's operations."
chimpymustgo
Aug 2013
#122
so glad the widespread us of encryption is putting the NSA out of business
nashville_brook
Aug 2013
#148
Of course you wouldnt. You can only see the little picture. Snowden got a parking ticket and must
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#147
So was the Boston Tea Party. Thank Dog our founders didnt have such narrow focus.
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#161
Yes, it is a crime. and so is what the NSA is doing. His crime is small, theirs is enormous.
1-Old-Man
Aug 2013
#162