Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I don't understand, given how things are today, how someone could argue AGAINST term limits. [View all]reusrename
(1,716 posts)18. snort!
OK then, FDR.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't understand, given how things are today, how someone could argue AGAINST term limits. [View all]
cherokeeprogressive
Aug 2013
OP
If all Reps and Senators were "new", then the lobbyists would control things even more.
SharonAnn
Aug 2013
#19
STAFFERS run the government today. Do you think your elected representative READS or WRITES
cherokeeprogressive
Aug 2013
#3
yeah, I'd say we're already at a point where most politicians are incompetent, but what about the
liberal_at_heart
Aug 2013
#8
It's a big herd... those who want congresscritter seats. Why do you think they want them? n/t
cherokeeprogressive
Aug 2013
#13
You might be right... and our congresscritters have ALREADY BENEFITTED...
cherokeeprogressive
Aug 2013
#14
Senators serve SIX YEAR terms.. if they haven't learned their jobs by the end of 1 term, they aren't
Ghost in the Machine
Aug 2013
#43
The group of congresscritters we have now have over A THOUSAND YEARS experience between them.
cherokeeprogressive
Aug 2013
#17
If we were really serious about government then high positions would be filled by a draft
Fumesucker
Aug 2013
#25
Do you think it's possible someone might vote for a candidate because their parents did?
cherokeeprogressive
Aug 2013
#21
Yep. There are any number of stupid reasons why someone might vote for a candidate.
Nye Bevan
Aug 2013
#22
F--- the corporations. Require that campaigns be entirely funded by public monies, and
kestrel91316
Aug 2013
#47
exactly. Limiting term limits does nothing to fix the lobbying problem.
liberal_at_heart
Aug 2013
#31
Term limits is a right wing solution. Term limits hands government over to lobbyists...
Luminous Animal
Aug 2013
#36
I agree with you 100%... Unfortunately, we are in the minority and you won't find much support...
Ghost in the Machine
Aug 2013
#44