Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I don't understand, given how things are today, how someone could argue AGAINST term limits. [View all]RudynJack
(1,044 posts)29. I'm vehemently against Term Limits
We've had them here in California, and it's fucked everything up.
Why should lobbyists be the only people with institutional knowledge?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't understand, given how things are today, how someone could argue AGAINST term limits. [View all]
cherokeeprogressive
Aug 2013
OP
If all Reps and Senators were "new", then the lobbyists would control things even more.
SharonAnn
Aug 2013
#19
STAFFERS run the government today. Do you think your elected representative READS or WRITES
cherokeeprogressive
Aug 2013
#3
yeah, I'd say we're already at a point where most politicians are incompetent, but what about the
liberal_at_heart
Aug 2013
#8
It's a big herd... those who want congresscritter seats. Why do you think they want them? n/t
cherokeeprogressive
Aug 2013
#13
You might be right... and our congresscritters have ALREADY BENEFITTED...
cherokeeprogressive
Aug 2013
#14
Senators serve SIX YEAR terms.. if they haven't learned their jobs by the end of 1 term, they aren't
Ghost in the Machine
Aug 2013
#43
The group of congresscritters we have now have over A THOUSAND YEARS experience between them.
cherokeeprogressive
Aug 2013
#17
If we were really serious about government then high positions would be filled by a draft
Fumesucker
Aug 2013
#25
Do you think it's possible someone might vote for a candidate because their parents did?
cherokeeprogressive
Aug 2013
#21
Yep. There are any number of stupid reasons why someone might vote for a candidate.
Nye Bevan
Aug 2013
#22
F--- the corporations. Require that campaigns be entirely funded by public monies, and
kestrel91316
Aug 2013
#47
exactly. Limiting term limits does nothing to fix the lobbying problem.
liberal_at_heart
Aug 2013
#31
Term limits is a right wing solution. Term limits hands government over to lobbyists...
Luminous Animal
Aug 2013
#36
I agree with you 100%... Unfortunately, we are in the minority and you won't find much support...
Ghost in the Machine
Aug 2013
#44