Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: TEPCO: 950 million becquerels of radioactive cesium per liter of water detected near No. 2 reactor [View all]Post title
Just so you know, a becquerel is a very small unit of measure
Body text first paragraph:
This is not to say that you'd want to be near such high concentrations for a long time, but if you're worried that this much is enough to contaminate, say, the entire Pacific ocean, it's way, way, WAY far from that.
Body text third paragraph
If the sum total of concentrated radioactive material (to WAY overestimate it) from Fukushima were as big one millionth of a square mile (a cube about 53 feet on each side), then completely dispersed through the ocean the material would only be at a concentration of a seventieth of a trillionth part.
I'm certain this can be described belittlement as in "the problem is too small, in the wider sense, to worry about". The only thing you admit to is "local hotspots" which is hardly a ringing condemnation of this ongoing disaster or even an expression of slight concern about how TEPCO can possibly deal with the escape of contaminated liquid.
I'll admit you are not as bad as the Baggins above who seems to draw comfort from the fact that one litre of water is emitting less radiation than a building weighing hundreds of tonnes.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
TEPCO: 950 million becquerels of radioactive cesium per liter of water detected near No. 2 reactor [View all]
The Straight Story
Jul 2013
OP
I have two grandsons, and possibly three more, and a teenaged granddaughter, soon. I try to teach
Mnemosyne
Aug 2013
#11
"Not with a bang, but with a whimper." Or as another DUer wrote here, "with a becquerel.".
Mnemosyne
Aug 2013
#13
The planet will thrive again once it chews us up and spits us out. The creatures suffer because of
Mnemosyne
Aug 2013
#26
I wish I didn't understand that at times. Life would be so much less worry if I had been ignorant.
Mnemosyne
Aug 2013
#21
It is still so much worse than they have admitted, more comes out all the time and
Mnemosyne
Aug 2013
#25
I redid my math. A swimming pool's worth has enough activity to severely injure 50+ people...
Gravitycollapse
Aug 2013
#19
If there ''isn't really all that much,'' why is it still a radioactive catastrophe 2.5 years on?
Octafish
Aug 2013
#29
I also said "The real problem is bad localized hot spots, which is worrisome enough".
Silent3
Aug 2013
#38
Because of Fukushima there are *parts of the Pacific* that are currently very bad...
Silent3
Aug 2013
#34