Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

These companies are EVIL! Vinnie From Indy Aug 2013 #1
DUzy! Th1onein Aug 2013 #5
Good luck with enforcing that. I don't see how this is legal cali Aug 2013 #2
Not an attorey Kelvin Mace Aug 2013 #4
If I had to guess... Orrex Aug 2013 #10
Unless the settlement includes ongoing payments or a trust, that won't work localroger Aug 2013 #13
Except that such a legal agreement could not be extended to minor children Kelvin Mace Aug 2013 #16
I would likewise love to see it go to court Orrex Aug 2013 #26
Agreed, Kelvin Mace Aug 2013 #34
That's the way I was taught but I haven't seen the inside of a classroom since matthews Aug 2013 #32
Upon reflection Kelvin Mace Aug 2013 #19
My thought is that by the time the children are 18, the PR games played by the industry... LanternWaste Aug 2013 #20
Oh, they will keep it up Kelvin Mace Aug 2013 #33
Those kids can NOT be held to a contract that their parents signed once they hit 18. kestrel91316 Aug 2013 #9
However, the SCOTUS has such a pro-business agenda, MsPithy Aug 2013 #21
I don't think this has much to do with legality, it is a civil matter and, even if completely Egalitarian Thug Aug 2013 #30
I don't think so IDemo Aug 2013 #3
WTF? libodem Aug 2013 #6
If they were my children mick063 Aug 2013 #7
Unless I am reading this wrong Kelvin Mace Aug 2013 #17
Take the money Cronus Protagonist Aug 2013 #8
Take the money. Offshore it and don't let anyone know where (say 3 places). And write about it. grahamhgreen Aug 2013 #18
Freedom from Speech costs a tad under a cool mill. Octafish Aug 2013 #11
+1 liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #43
The children are to young to agree to that Marrah_G Aug 2013 #12
Really means you wonder just what it is that they're hiding. chemenger Aug 2013 #14
Bingo! Champion Jack Aug 2013 #28
I don't know how that could be legally binding after they become 18. blackspade Aug 2013 #15
How is it "a common restriction" to be forbidden to discuss a SUBJECT, not just the specific legal WinkyDink Aug 2013 #22
How can this be legal? A child under 18 cannot legally consent to a contract. 1monster Aug 2013 #23
Frack should be made a cuss word felix_numinous Aug 2013 #24
I want to know how the FUCK it's legal in Penn. for a doctor to NOT be allowed to tell a patient Volaris Aug 2013 #25
Like the AZ law prohibiting doctors from telling women they have a tubal pregnancy? Thank ALEC. freshwest Aug 2013 #31
I don't call that socialism... Volaris Aug 2013 #38
Gag orders and socialim? Are you thinking of another post? freshwest Aug 2013 #39
Well don't say Fracking, say FUCKING. Betsy Ross Aug 2013 #27
so much secrecy these days n/t Enrique Aug 2013 #29
How can they even enforce that??? arcane1 Aug 2013 #35
The company'd be up on murder charges when the first judge to see that died laughing. (nt) Posteritatis Aug 2013 #36
Texas Sharon has an update reporting that Range is backing down Agony Aug 2013 #37
The first rule of Frack Club Blue Owl Aug 2013 #40
Duzy!!! rocktivity Aug 2013 #41
They are thugs trying to intimidate those who don't know any better. liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #42
Wow, terrible. (no text) Quantess Aug 2013 #44
Range Resources? They have a history of using what they call "psy ops" derby378 Aug 2013 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»‘Frack Gag’ Bans Children...»Reply #41