General Discussion

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)

13. Welcome aboard 'brush' -

Reply to brush (Reply #11)

Sat Aug 3, 2013, 06:18 PM

Aug 2013

May it be that we 'brush' this bad faith statute from this country;
and restore good order to society and civility.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

54 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Please Sign Trayvon Martin Mother/Father Petition to Address Stand Your Ground Bad Faith Law? [View all] laserhaas Aug 2013 OP

Done. lamp_shade Aug 2013 #1

Thanks 'lamb_shade' laserhaas Aug 2013 #5

signing now Liberal_in_LA Aug 2013 #2

Appreciate it 'Liberal_in_LA' laserhaas Aug 2013 #6

los angeles Liberal_in_LA Aug 2013 #17

signed think Aug 2013 #3

Thank ye 'think' laserhaas Aug 2013 #7

Thank you for posting think Aug 2013 #9

Your welcome - PLEASE also make sure you "socialize" the Petition. laserhaas Aug 2013 #10

Signed historylovr Aug 2013 #4

Do appreciate it 'historylovr' laserhaas Aug 2013 #8

On board here. nt brush Aug 2013 #11

Welcome aboard 'brush' - laserhaas Aug 2013 #13

Done libodem Aug 2013 #12

THANKs 'libodem' laserhaas Aug 2013 #14

Will do libodem Aug 2013 #16

Happy to. mercymechap Aug 2013 #15

Thanks - The correct analogy is GZ got 'Scot Free' away with killing Trayvon Martin. laserhaas Aug 2013 #18

+1. Challenge to all Gungeoneers to support what is truly responsible gun legislation. Hoyt Aug 2013 #19

Amen to support of "responsible" legislation laserhaas Aug 2013 #28

I signed and absolutely support elimination of the SYG laws, but would that have helped rhett o rick Aug 2013 #20

The 2005 SYG law changed the definition of self-defense to essentially SYG. Hoyt Aug 2013 #21

The way I understood it the judge ruled not to include the words in the law rhett o rick Aug 2013 #22

Big fat Internet lie ceonupe Aug 2013 #23

The SYG law changed definition of self-defense. The jury instructions prior to 2005, Hoyt Aug 2013 #24

problem is in this case ceonupe Aug 2013 #25

Zman who trained for fighting three days a week could have ended the thing or Hoyt Aug 2013 #27

And was still so soft the trainer would not allow him into a ring. N/T GreenStormCloud Aug 2013 #29

The trainer was just another bigot who lied for Zman. Hoyt Aug 2013 #30

Concur - GZ had a weapon - all he had to do was draw it and say FREEZE! laserhaas Aug 2013 #34

In the trial the reason stated was because of his credit report. N/T GreenStormCloud Aug 2013 #36

Counting fights with people, abuse, possible rape, etc., you wonder why the hell people support the Hoyt Aug 2013 #37

What was said in the trial was legal testimony. GreenStormCloud Aug 2013 #38

Says those who defend Zman. Actually, the fights and spousal abuse ate documented. Hoyt Aug 2013 #39

And offered him the civilian equivalent? Pelican Aug 2013 #49

It sure is convenient... Pelican Aug 2013 #44

If they are also into guns and support Zman, you can pretty much bet on it. Hoyt Aug 2013 #45

Mr. Hoyt, your presumption (empirical evidence notwithstanding) - is, in essence, bigotry laserhaas Aug 2013 #48

Bias is at play in this case, from the outset. If the roles were askew of what transpired laserhaas Aug 2013 #46

Au contraire 'ceonupe' - your remarks are errant in several instances; laserhaas Aug 2013 #47

Yes, it is possible to initiate a conflict and still claim self-defense. GreenStormCloud Aug 2013 #31

You argue this from the State that still has draconian Laws allowing to shoot/kill your wife outside laserhaas Aug 2013 #33

That is the way self defense law is in all states. GreenStormCloud Aug 2013 #35

Why? Do you seek a practical application of the draconian? laserhaas Aug 2013 #42

I wanted you to prove it. Such a law is NOT on the books. GreenStormCloud Aug 2013 #43

Signed Peaceplace80 Aug 2013 #26

I find any conversation on the verdict being judicious a pathetic reflection of contemporary America laserhaas Aug 2013 #32

As for the argument of who was on top of whom - that TOO - is BOGUS banter/ hyperbole/ conjecture laserhaas Aug 2013 #40

It is disingenuous to argue GZ had the right to defend himself; after Trayvon Martin defended 1st. laserhaas Aug 2013 #41

The PETITION is now at 325,000 signatures and climbing. Thanks for your help thus far. PLEASE laserhaas Aug 2013 #50

Done! Now at 328,793. k+r Little Star Aug 2013 #51

Thanks - 'Little Star' laserhaas Aug 2013 #52

The PETITION is now at 341,000 signatures and climbing. Thanks for your help thus far. PLEASE laserhaas Aug 2013 #53

362,000 signatures and climbing laserhaas Aug 2013 #54