Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
19. Most of the responses so far have missed a key point...it was pharmacies not pharmacists
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 08:08 PM
Feb 2012

The difference is huge if you take a moment to think about it.

If the business decides not to stock it, there is nothing the duty pharmacist can do, regardless of what they personally believe. If the business does stock it and the pharmacist chooses not to dispense, he will be fired for failing in his duty to his employer.

When taken to the macro level, the state really should not be in the business of telling businesses what they should sell. However, we as consumers have and should use that power. If there is a pharmacy that will not carry plan B or Birth control pills, spread the word. Normally they won't be in business long.

I would like to know how often this is really a problem. I do not know of any major chain that does not stock such meds and the remaining small shops are dying rapidly. If there is one discriminating against women, the consumer action can kill it that much sooner.





Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is soooo screwed up in so many ways - soooo backward. US = United Stupidity. n/t RKP5637 Feb 2012 #1
Idiocracy, here we come... WCGreen Feb 2012 #3
You know, I tried to watch Idiocracy all the way through and never made it ... it struck RKP5637 Feb 2012 #11
It's the broadcast media's fault.... WCGreen Feb 2012 #12
If they recieve certification from the state.... WCGreen Feb 2012 #2
Pull their licence Angry Dragon Feb 2012 #7
Can someone tell me what the difference would be Angry Dragon Feb 2012 #4
appointed by georgie boy, big surprise niyad Feb 2012 #5
dear pharmacists, if you have objections to providing legal drugs, GET ANOTHER JOB niyad Feb 2012 #6
funny how the religious crowd reads a job description, takes the job anyway, THEN msongs Feb 2012 #10
It Would Be Nice If..... zorahopkins Feb 2012 #8
So, a pharmacists rights to withhold prescrition medicine trumps a person's rights to get them? Old and In the Way Feb 2012 #9
No, the ruling was that the state can not command a business to carry certain merchandise ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2012 #20
I want my right to freedom FROM religion MiniMe Feb 2012 #13
In this country, it would seem that only christians get that right. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #16
DO YOUR JOB or FIND ANOTHER ONE. Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #14
Nominated by Bush the Dumber... joeybee12 Feb 2012 #15
The war on women goes on. CrispyQ Feb 2012 #17
Well then Politicalboi Feb 2012 #18
Most of the responses so far have missed a key point...it was pharmacies not pharmacists ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2012 #19
Sounds like an opportunity. Jester Messiah Feb 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge: State can't make d...»Reply #19