You make up a succession of scenarios:
"She could have just as easily been killed by a criminal associate rather than the cops" (we have not heard anything about any associates. Her boyfriend was unarmed)
" if you try to kill a cop" (and what has that to do with this story? He tried to get away)
"I don't know the whole story here yet" (no kidding, but that hasn't stopped you making stuff up and trying to use it in your argument)
" Usually it just amounts to physical and emotional abuse" (nothing in this story about him abusing her. You seem to have a fantasy going here)
"how he beats her because he loves her. She'll either wise up eventually or remain a punching bag. Or she might end up costarring in another American murder-suicide tragedy, people wringing their hands over how she would still be alive if only the crazy man respected the restraining order." (yep, that's a complete fantasy on your part. You are justifying this shooting by saying "these people, they beat each other up and kill each other all the time - it's inevitable. Why does it matter if a cop got there first?"
Your post above? More fantasies. About rape, or the death of a child, this time. And what has that to do with this case? Fuck all. She was with her boyfriend. He was wanted for burglary. There is no death penalty for burglary. It is not a crime involving violence against a person. If she did know he was a burglar, which isn't actually established, then this does not mean she was in an inevitably violent situation just by spending time with him.
"I see self-inflicted pain and it makes me angry because it's so unnecessary." - no, you see death at the hands of the police, and you call it 'self-inflicted pain". And that's why you come across as a right winger.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read