Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

flexnor

(392 posts)
28. the greatest mystery to me in American culture
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 10:02 PM
Feb 2012

is that MOST people do not take that warning seriously

how much plainer can it get?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The Roberts court is fast becoming one of the worst courts in history. Justice wanted Feb 2012 #1
I can't believe Kagan went along with this holding. morningfog Feb 2012 #4
I did start a thread asking what is going on with Kagan. I thought she was a progressive. Justice wanted Feb 2012 #5
I have liked her writing and the majorities and dissents of hers morningfog Feb 2012 #13
You'd think after being arrested, tried and convicted they'd already have a firm grasp of the idea. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #2
This would apply to anyone already in custody. Including those not yet tried or convicted morningfog Feb 2012 #3
If you've been Mirandized for Crime A then confress to Crime B Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #6
I think the point is, once you are convicted of a crime, you lose certain rights. stevenleser Feb 2012 #8
You do, but there are many people in prison who have not be morningfog Feb 2012 #11
All the people in prison have been convicted. You are confusing prison with jail. nt stevenleser Feb 2012 #25
That is true for the most part. morningfog Feb 2012 #27
No doubt, by the very nature of the act of incarceration. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #14
That is not how Miranda has been applied. morningfog Feb 2012 #9
But the knowledge of your 5A rights doesn't evaporate out of your head. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #12
That has not been and should not be the standard. morningfog Feb 2012 #15
When people are sworn-in for giving testimony at a trial Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #16
Witnesses at trial are not at risk of self-incrimination, morningfog Feb 2012 #17
Even if they were the defendant a single swearing-in is still sufficient. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #18
And confessions absent Miranda are per se coercive. morningfog Feb 2012 #19
Apples v Oranges Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #24
This may surprise you, but prisoners are still protected by morningfog Feb 2012 #26
I'm as liberal as you can get BUT, dballance Feb 2012 #7
It isn't so easy or black-and-white. morningfog Feb 2012 #10
I don't think this ruling changes much. former9thward Feb 2012 #20
There are strict standards on what is admissible in those cases. morningfog Feb 2012 #21
why not do away with miranda entirely? frylock Feb 2012 #22
I dont agree. nt stevenleser Feb 2012 #23
the greatest mystery to me in American culture flexnor Feb 2012 #28
It is plain, and important. Which is why everyone should get it. morningfog Feb 2012 #29
Must see youtube on miranda warning by law professor flexnor Feb 2012 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court says prison...»Reply #28