Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Do you get the REAL significance of the DEA surveillance story? Wow, just Wow. [View all]sellitman
(11,745 posts)128. Thom Hartmann mentioned your thread on his show yesterday
Mentioned your name too.
Good job.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
161 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Do you get the REAL significance of the DEA surveillance story? Wow, just Wow. [View all]
Jackpine Radical
Aug 2013
OP
Just because the news media found out about it doesn't mean that the feds wanted them to. n/t
totodeinhere
Aug 2013
#15
I guess those political scientists who have described inverted totalitarianism
nadinbrzezinski
Aug 2013
#35
Why don't you address the parts of the OP that you don't agree with? I remember back when
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#103
Alex Jones, and I don't think some on the left want CONSTRUCTIVE criticism just bitching and fudr
uponit7771
Aug 2013
#140
And tattooing "666" on your wrist? Or will they embed a "666" chip under your skin? n/t
totodeinhere
Aug 2013
#30
And with all the automation now that we are in the totally techie 21st Century,
truedelphi
Aug 2013
#118
That would be a great 2014 campaign slogan: "You all are too fat, dumb, and lazy. You're a forest of
Common Sense Party
Aug 2013
#143
Those not seeing where we are going surely can't read the road signs IMO and/or
RKP5637
Aug 2013
#89
And, think of that with an algorithm of predictive behavior analysis run against
RKP5637
Aug 2013
#96
I'm a little confused--Do you mean "what good is OUR having this information…?"
Jackpine Radical
Aug 2013
#28
Uh, not true. This is a different type of totalitarianism, one that was alluded to in "Brave New
Nay
Aug 2013
#27
It's apologist hyperbole -- "We have nothing to worry about! Trust the MIC in all things!"
villager
Aug 2013
#104
Really? So no problem that NSA "terror fighting" data is being used to arrest people for smoking pot
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2013
#115
But many of the collaborating entities have off-the-books black budgets.
Jackpine Radical
Aug 2013
#64
DEA admitted pursuing domestic cases based on tips from informants that turned out 2b NSA intercepts
Catherina
Aug 2013
#4
It is illogical to think that the Republicans can filibuster but Senate Democrats cannot filibuster
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2013
#8
I'm waiting for someone to get busted for saying online that they smoked pot in the past.
Spitfire of ATJ
Aug 2013
#14
Well in that case they should arrest President Obama and millions of others.
totodeinhere
Aug 2013
#29
So, it looks like we have to have legalization instead of just medical marijuana
factsarenotfair
Aug 2013
#17
It is quite safe to assume that no existing technology is unavailable to the NSA
1-Old-Man
Aug 2013
#32
They have the budget and the technology. Ethics, conscience and accountability -not so much
suffragette
Aug 2013
#110
Framing, yes it does sound like that. And it looks like informants and nations profit tremendously,
suffragette
Aug 2013
#49
Prison Labor Booms As Unemployment Remains High; Companies Reap Benefits
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#55
"normal investigative techniques to recreate the information provided by SOD." < in other words,
jtuck004
Aug 2013
#59
The real significance is that this is now a Dem/Obama scandal, not a Bush scandal even though
Coyotl
Aug 2013
#63
Oh, only a paranoid person would think they would use "terror fighting" powers to arrest pot smokers
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2013
#66
It is! It is! It is PROTECTING US AGAINST THE TERROR OF -NOT- BEING THROWN IN JAIL FOR SMOKING POT!
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2013
#114
actually is was originally done in 1937 to control the Mexican population...
TeamPooka
Aug 2013
#150