Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(110,255 posts)
63. Some states actually do.
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 02:33 PM
Aug 2013

Why should a well-off parent who has raised his child to expect college punish that child at the time of a divorce? For instance, my father put three of us through college, but my brother was a sophomore when my parents divorced. Why should my brother be the only one without financial assistance for college, when my father could afford it?

Many states agree with me.

http://www.divorcenet.com/states/washington/wa_art02

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I am curious newfie11 Aug 2013 #1
Individual judges can and do order it, when the non-custodial parent has assets pnwmom Aug 2013 #28
Why should divorced parents be mandated to pay for college, when still-married parents aren't? Sheldon Cooper Aug 2013 #37
The still-married parents who don't probably haven't raised that child to expect college. pnwmom Aug 2013 #42
Ridiculous. Sheldon Cooper Aug 2013 #44
Read this and weep: pnwmom Aug 2013 #50
I rather doubt any state does that Spider Jerusalem Aug 2013 #2
States may not but individual judges can and do. pnwmom Aug 2013 #29
Why should the parent be required to pay for an adult's education? Orrex Aug 2013 #41
In BC, in most cases, non-custodial parents must continue to pay child support after age 19... OnlinePoker Aug 2013 #60
I read a set of divorce paperwork pretty much every single working day. Socal31 Aug 2013 #82
Do they require custodial parents or MineralMan Aug 2013 #3
Not to my knowledge. I found this on the subject of paying for college when parents are divorced. raccoon Aug 2013 #4
Michigan doesn't by law. knitter4democracy Aug 2013 #5
In Michigan support can go to age 19 and a half for a full time student. pnwmom Aug 2013 #76
As far as I know, that only applies to high school. knitter4democracy Aug 2013 #84
Post removed Post removed Aug 2013 #6
College aged = adult Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2013 #7
Lots of them give judges that power. Are you aware that federal college aid forms pnwmom Aug 2013 #30
The law may expect a parental contribution, but it doesn't mandatte it. Sheldon Cooper Aug 2013 #38
But a judge can mandate it in many states. pnwmom Aug 2013 #40
That is a ridiculous point. Sheldon Cooper Aug 2013 #43
Of course it wouldn't be fair for the youngest child of a well-off parent to be the only sibling pnwmom Aug 2013 #46
Your little brother's story changes nothing, as I've said. Sheldon Cooper Aug 2013 #51
Your stubborn insistence does nothing to change the fact that it is COMMON pnwmom Aug 2013 #55
In fact, it is a ridiculous point Orrex Aug 2013 #53
When a student is already a sophomore in college at the time of the divorce, pnwmom Aug 2013 #66
Thanks again for the link Orrex Aug 2013 #70
I agree that the state laws are all over the place. pnwmom Aug 2013 #71
LOL. Sad but true. Orrex Aug 2013 #74
Granting judicial discretion is a far cry from the sort of legal requirement to which the OP eludes Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2013 #78
AFAIK, no state requires that. Deep13 Aug 2013 #8
Some states actually do. pnwmom Aug 2013 #63
PA used to, no longer Freddie Aug 2013 #9
I suppose education is not such a high priority there LiberalEsto Aug 2013 #10
Why are you singling out South Carolina? nt B2G Aug 2013 #31
I was divorced in Ohio and there's no mention of college expenses in the sinkingfeeling Aug 2013 #11
I'd be more shocked if a state required parents to pay for college. Dr. Strange Aug 2013 #12
So.....they can pay for college themselves like the rest of us?? cbdo2007 Aug 2013 #13
Day I turned 18 I was told it's YOYO time. hobbit709 Aug 2013 #14
IMO make it between the student and each parent treestar Aug 2013 #15
For many years the noncustodial parent has been allowed to divorce his/her children as easily as jwirr Aug 2013 #16
I don't think any state, conservative or liberal, should force Sheldon Cooper Aug 2013 #17
I think helping to contribute to getting your child "launched" into adulthood IdaBriggs Aug 2013 #18
Exactly. If you are able to help your child (read: you're very wealthy), great. Go for it. Common Sense Party Aug 2013 #33
Yah. Someone who gets it. joeglow3 Aug 2013 #45
A student can't apply for Federal loans or grants unless a parent fills out financial aid papers pnwmom Aug 2013 #80
The 'liberal' state of Maryland does not either. What is your point? nt kelly1mm Aug 2013 #19
When states require parents who are not divorced kiva Aug 2013 #20
I agree. I think this is an equal protection issue. I'm paying for my non-custodial daughter's stevenleser Aug 2013 #36
This is my take on it, too - kiva Aug 2013 #39
Does any state force any parents (noncustodial or custodial, married or non-married) to pay that? tammywammy Aug 2013 #21
Many states allow judges to decide whether a parent should pay for college costs. pnwmom Aug 2013 #81
Stop and think for a minute... cthulu2016 Aug 2013 #22
No state requires any parent to support a child beyond 18. DuaneBidoux Aug 2013 #23
My state can and does exactly this. lumberjack_jeff Aug 2013 #47
Wrong. Many states either require support for college students or allow judges to do so. pnwmom Aug 2013 #52
Link? Orrex Aug 2013 #54
I put a link in my post. How could you miss it? n/t pnwmom Aug 2013 #56
Your link doesn't work. tammywammy Aug 2013 #57
Whoa--that's what it said when I clicked on it, too! Orrex Aug 2013 #58
Here's the direct link. pnwmom Aug 2013 #62
It's interesting that some states still think unequal protection is A-OK. Orrex Aug 2013 #64
It all depends on how you look at it. pnwmom Aug 2013 #68
"Children in different families have never been treated equally." Orrex Aug 2013 #73
I'm the OP (for this subthreat). I'm happy to be corrected. DuaneBidoux Aug 2013 #85
Sorry, it's post #48, way down at the bottom. pnwmom Aug 2013 #61
In Mo. Go Vols Aug 2013 #24
Secondary is High School exboyfil Aug 2013 #27
I was responding to the claim Go Vols Aug 2013 #32
Thanks for the clarification exboyfil Aug 2013 #49
In Missouri non-custodial parents can be required to pay for college costs, too. pnwmom Aug 2013 #59
When I divorced in Illinois Silver Swan Aug 2013 #25
As soon as my grand daughter turned 18 her father quit paying anything for her in Virginia. My appleannie1 Aug 2013 #26
I am shocked--SHOCKED--to find anti-Southern, bigoted flamebait on DU. Common Sense Party Aug 2013 #34
It's not that common unless one party is pretty well-off Yo_Mama Aug 2013 #35
The case law in my state came about because of a father who could easily afford it pnwmom Aug 2013 #77
FYI. Here is a list of child support requirements for college by state: pnwmom Aug 2013 #48
Corporations haven't figured out how to make a buck off it yet. Gidney N Cloyd Aug 2013 #65
I am a reluctant Carolina Aug 2013 #67
Actually, a judge in South Carolina MAY REQUIRE a parent to pay for college. pnwmom Aug 2013 #69
"may require" Carolina Aug 2013 #72
You're right. In most states there isn't a blanket requirement -- it's up to the judge. pnwmom Aug 2013 #75
There are states that require parents to pay for college for their kids? I had to pay for mine Recursion Aug 2013 #79
Why should ANY parent be required to pay for their kid's college? taught_me_patience Aug 2013 #83
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I am shocked--shocked tha...»Reply #63