Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Greenwald: Embassy Closings Looks Like A Conspiracy To Silence NSA Debate [View all]geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)81. Democracy Now headline-
Greenwald: Is U.S. Exaggerating Threat to Embassies to Silence Critics of NSA Domestic Surveillance?
Has the Greenwald fan club at Democracy Now turned on him by writing such an unfair headline?
Greenwald exact quote:
You know, its so ludicrous. For eight straight years, literally, Democrats, every time there was a terrorist alert or a terrorist advisory issued by the United States government in the middle of a debate over one of the Bush-Cheney civil liberties abuses, would accuse the United States government and the national security state of exaggerating terrorism threats, of manipulating advisories, of hyping the dangers of al-Qaeda, in order to distract attention away from their abuses and to scare the population into submitting to whatever it is they wanted to do. And so, here we are in the midst of, you know, one of the most intense debates and sustained debates that weve had in a very long time in this country over the dangers of excess surveillance, and suddenly an administration that has spent two years claiming that it has decimated al-Qaeda decides that there is this massive threat that involves the closing of embassies and consulates throughout the world. And within literally an amount of hours, the likes of Saxby Chambliss and Lindsey Graham join with the White House and Democrats in Congresswho, remember, are the leading defenders of the NSA at this pointto exploit that terrorist threat and to insist that it shows that the NSA and these programs are necessary.
That's exactly his implication--Obama's exaggerating the threat in order to justify the NSA program. His use of "suddenly" is meant to imply dishonesty.
Bonus narcissism:
AMY GOODMAN: Glenn, you were supposed to testify last week before Congress. That hearing was canceled because President Obama was meeting with Democrats. But instead, you released a major piece. And I want to talk about that in a second, but will you be testifying before Congress again? And would you come into the United States to testify? Last week it was going to be by Skype.
GLENN GREENWALD: So, the hearing hasI dont know if its been finalized, but I believe its been rescheduled for September the 17th or 18th. They definitely intend to reschedule that hearing that was canceled when President Obama suddenly developed a newfound interest in speaking with House Democrats, whom hes traditionally ignored, which caused the cancellation of that hearing. So, I believe that it is being rescheduled. Whether I would come and physically appear or appear remotely by video depends on a number of factors, including my schedule, the reporting that Im doing at the time, as well as thethe legal advices that I get from my lawyers. So, well see whether or not that hearing takes place with me remotely there or physically there, but I absolutely intend to testify.
GLENN GREENWALD: So, the hearing hasI dont know if its been finalized, but I believe its been rescheduled for September the 17th or 18th. They definitely intend to reschedule that hearing that was canceled when President Obama suddenly developed a newfound interest in speaking with House Democrats, whom hes traditionally ignored, which caused the cancellation of that hearing. So, I believe that it is being rescheduled. Whether I would come and physically appear or appear remotely by video depends on a number of factors, including my schedule, the reporting that Im doing at the time, as well as thethe legal advices that I get from my lawyers. So, well see whether or not that hearing takes place with me remotely there or physically there, but I absolutely intend to testify.
Glenn Greenwald is suggesting Obama scheduled a meeting with House Democrats in order to fuck with Glenn Greenwald.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
206 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Greenwald: Embassy Closings Looks Like A Conspiracy To Silence NSA Debate [View all]
Purveyor
Aug 2013
OP
And Raw Story conviniently leavves off at that... here is the rest from the original interview...
Luminous Animal
Aug 2013
#153
He's alleging a conspiracy between Obama, Graham, Chambliss etc to silence
geek tragedy
Aug 2013
#93
Damn paidpropagandiststasiauthoritariancorporatistquislingfascistsockpuppets
Cali_Democrat
Aug 2013
#84
Let's keep him high on the pedestal like he deserves, because it's all about Greenwald
Life Long Dem
Aug 2013
#4
They'll drown you in hype- e -potomus. But go to bed and you will be better off. n/t
Aerows
Aug 2013
#122
It is so patently dishonest it is hard to believe that the headline writer is literate.
Luminous Animal
Aug 2013
#60
He is not saying that the terrorist threat is not real. He is saying that using that threat
Luminous Animal
Aug 2013
#152
It's "#3", not "#2", and it's because we always call their operations guy "#3"
Recursion
Aug 2013
#109
Bingo. Subtract the ooga-booga words from the headlines, and the truth emerges.
backscatter712
Aug 2013
#129
I wonder if Al Queda or other groups that don't like our policies are planting false flag
cascadiance
Aug 2013
#15
What's it to you? Are you some kind of authority figure on this site? eom
millennialmax
Aug 2013
#23
Why am I not surprised? NOTHING but personal attacks from damn near Day 1 with that one
Number23
Aug 2013
#173
Ah, a culture of intimidation to ensure new users only post things accepted by the long-term posters
millennialmax
Aug 2013
#32
I blame gun controllers for the 1994 loss of Congress after having 40 years of having a Democratic
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2013
#161
where the hell did you get this bogus DU protocol? I've never even seen the poster you claim is
KittyWampus
Aug 2013
#54
"The particular duer you responded to is pretty good at sniffing out trolls, and zombies, and such."
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#61
When someone disagrees with you, theyll point out the fact that you have few posts
David Krout
Aug 2013
#133
oh codswallop. more like the threat is blowback from drone killings that we've been carrying
cali
Aug 2013
#34
He never said what the headline claims he said. The lies, they just keep coming.
Luminous Animal
Aug 2013
#48
Isn't it interesting that the first time we have had a major bush style terror warning in many years
AZ Progressive
Aug 2013
#67
Greenwald thinks there is nothing wrong with spying on terrorists. You'd know this if you actually
Luminous Animal
Aug 2013
#170
Yes! Obama also orchestrated Benghazi as a false flag to lay the foundation for this attack.
Drunken Irishman
Aug 2013
#101
Well, Pres. Obama is becoming more GWBish every day. It like Tom Ridge's CODE RED. nt
TheBlackAdder
Aug 2013
#113
Except for the pesky FACT that he never said that. It is a fabrication originating with the
Luminous Animal
Aug 2013
#169
Everyone except Greenwald used the word "conspiracy". Especially his opponents.
backscatter712
Aug 2013
#131
Yet another thing that was widely accepted as obvious around here when Bush was president,
Marr
Aug 2013
#137
What kind of a solution to an "immenent threat" is closing dozens of our embassies?
another_liberal
Aug 2013
#184