General Discussion

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)

37. Irony much?

Tue Aug 6, 2013, 04:56 PM

Aug 2013

So you the history expert should know about the reaction to us troops ...the enemy jumped off ledges/killed themselves rather than surrender ...but you go on and think they wouldn't have resisted to the end. pffft what ever

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

82 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Some facts on dropping the two bombs [View all] nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 OP

About those Russians jberryhill Aug 2013 #1

snarf leftstreet Aug 2013 #3

Ahem. n/t Aerows Aug 2013 #16

in Asia after 1945 with atomic weapons. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #28

If I had been in Truman's shoes at the time, Sherman A1 Aug 2013 #2

Post removed Post removed Aug 2013 #19

So the citizens of a nation Phillyindy Aug 2013 #24

Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2013 #67

Though I generally defend their use AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #30

This exact post was hidden in another thread. nolabear Aug 2013 #59

Looks like the juries are 2/2 AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #62

Studying history is not a strong point with a lot of people. hobbit709 Aug 2013 #4

It could easily be that the bombs saved a lot of Japanese lives. Even if we brewens Aug 2013 #5

Fact #4 - not so factual. Aristus Aug 2013 #6

I will take it nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #9

Nice try, but... TheLion Aug 2013 #12

You do know it, but for Aristus sake nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #57

East Asia Tin Works (300y from blast point) made teddy bears. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #31

A particular point zipplewrath Aug 2013 #7

This major was a hard core member of the no surrender club nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #8

The coup attempt is a very forgotten piece of history... sarisataka Aug 2013 #11

It was the first time in history the vast majority of Japanese people had ever heard his voice. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #32

"Which you obviously do not know"... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #10

Sorry, but going to have to disagree with you, Nadin. Fantastic Anarchist Aug 2013 #13

you are disagreeing a lot less nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #15

I still love ya! Fantastic Anarchist Aug 2013 #17

seriously you disagreed a lot less than you thought nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #34

In fairness... AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #38

Regarding the Soviet invasion.. Posteritatis Aug 2013 #14

Yes, I understand that there was an agreement. Fantastic Anarchist Aug 2013 #18

Check out this podcast. Savannahmann Aug 2013 #20

The only person I see Phillyindy Aug 2013 #21

You're just a troll. jeff47 Aug 2013 #22

I suspect you are right nt Dreamer Tatum Aug 2013 #25

+1 eggplant Aug 2013 #40

You called it right. tumtum Aug 2013 #44

So tell me, the war never happened? nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #35

It's simple... Phillyindy Aug 2013 #39

It was not terror son nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #43

It was... Phillyindy Aug 2013 #51

So they are special and everybody else nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #53

Logically invalid. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #46

The atomic bombs WERE different. Jim Lane Aug 2013 #80

A new type of weapon that I hate to say it nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #81

kick & recommended. William769 Aug 2013 #23

Thank you. SheilaT Aug 2013 #26

Thanks for your input lumpy Aug 2013 #56

Bold post. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #27

+1 N/T GreenStormCloud Aug 2013 #29

Sorry... vrp Aug 2013 #33

The argument of the necessity started as early as 1947 nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #36

? vrp Aug 2013 #47

Welcome to my ignore list nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #52

Irony much? L0oniX Aug 2013 #37

The people of Hiroshima were busy ripping down their own homes, digging bunkers AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #48

I'd sign the Szil�rd petition then nail it to the totem pole you squat on everyday here. miyazaki Aug 2013 #41

Fukushima will be worse. reusrename Aug 2013 #42

absolutely, but that has to do with contant release nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #50

Sure. Now to go back on topic, I've always been split on this. reusrename Aug 2013 #63

They had that debate, even before hiroshima nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #64

There were no good choices for decades to follow. reusrename Aug 2013 #65

Absolutely, nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #66

I, too, worry about what will be done to the young 'uns. reusrename Aug 2013 #78

4 and 5 are not facts, and you need links to support your other "facts" Th1onein Aug 2013 #45

You are right, it is not true nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #49

Nadine, they were negotiating peace with us before we dropped the bomb on them. Th1onein Aug 2013 #60

Not quite, they were talking to the swiss representatives nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #61

I don't think that you are correct. Th1onein Aug 2013 #77

Yes, but the division in the high command was real nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #79

Incidentally, we risked lives and the success of the mission to warn civilians out of the cities. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #54

If the US hadn't used them first, somebody would have wanted to use them later. reformist2 Aug 2013 #55

The Japanese could have stopped the war at any time... Deep13 Aug 2013 #58

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were "the push" the Japanese needed... roamer65 Aug 2013 #68

Yes they were. They were more than just that nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #69

I had a relative on the island of Tinian when the bombs were there, Nadin. roamer65 Aug 2013 #71

I know...one of the vets at the Red Cross in Mexico nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #72

#4: an airburst at 10,000 ft is pretty much the opposite of "targeting". n/t DisgustipatedinCA Aug 2013 #70

wrong altitude canonfodder Aug 2013 #74

You're right about the altitude, but from 1950 or from 10,000, precision is not the main benefit DisgustipatedinCA Aug 2013 #75

In the context of WW II as you know, that is total war, nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #82

THE DECISION TO USE THE ATOMIC BOMB - For those looking for more than the status quo opinion usGovOwesUs3Trillion Aug 2013 #73

After reading the history...I am never unhappy with a cloudy day. roamer65 Aug 2013 #76