Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
33. You're still just focusing on that part
Wed Aug 7, 2013, 01:24 PM
Aug 2013

I'll give you that they are Private enterprises that are federally regulated and are listed in the stock market.

Saying that they are like the USPS is valid that they were initially a Public entity that were privatized.
Fannie and Freddie are also limited in what they can do if they want to keep their standing. That is unlike any other bank, they have increased regulations that make them special.

I understand focusing on just saying that they are Private since that isn't the actual issue. Again not addressing the actual concerns on the post.

So here again:
----
Where is the guarantee that the US Tax Payers won't have to bail them out again?
--It is in that proposal that says : "Private capital must be wiped out before the government pays out on catastrophic guarantees provided through government reinsurance of private-market loans."
This means that if they underfund that Private Capital which does NOT show any method of enforcing that they fully fund this. It is also another pool of money that THEY will lobby to be able to use for their own play. Unless there is a guarantee that this is done properly it will just be used for more consolidation and acquisition. This can be put in without taking out Fannie and Freddie. Instead, they are thinking of creating a new agency to take care of Government backed mortgages.

How can they guarantee that the mortgage rates won't sky rocket as this proposal is being done?
--Much like what happened with credit cards and bank fees, these banks immediately put out all the stops in placing more fees and upticking their rates in anticipation of new legislation. This will also happen during the gap of time between passing and implementation.

Why tie the immigration debate in this proposal?
--It feels like they don't want to pass it with this added in. With this added in, it guarantees that this becomes contentious and will allow banks to do the prior point.

As per mentioned, I am still trying to figure this thing out. Merely saying they are a private entity does not diminish other concerns. Much of that is assuming that rates are going to stay low.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sounds damn reasonable to me. Old and In the Way Aug 2013 #1
Yeah, but ProSense Aug 2013 #7
won't make me want to buy a home. PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 #2
Privatize everything - Reagan would be proud. nt TBF Aug 2013 #3
They were ProSense Aug 2013 #5
Don't even try - TBF Aug 2013 #9
Who the fuck are you calling "right-wing"? ProSense Aug 2013 #10
An idea stand on it's face - TBF Aug 2013 #12
"destruction of the two agencies that actually made home ownership possible in this country " ProSense Aug 2013 #13
How about a public solution? TBF Aug 2013 #14
Did you even read the information? The President proposed a public solution. ProSense Aug 2013 #15
Where is the part about the government-insured mortgages? TBF Aug 2013 #16
It's there, and if you can't find it, that's on you. n/t ProSense Aug 2013 #17
All that blue ink and you can't answer a simple question. TBF Aug 2013 #18
Go to the "blue ink" and read until you find it. n/t ProSense Aug 2013 #20
You do know … 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #36
And paying that fee will mean it's harder TBF Aug 2013 #38
As I recall... kentuck Aug 2013 #4
The fact that ProSense Aug 2013 #6
I trust Grijalva and Ellison... Old and In the Way Aug 2013 #8
Really, it has become absurd. n/t ProSense Aug 2013 #11
A "better bargain"......dare we say, a GRAND BARGAIN. woo me with science Aug 2013 #19
Are Fannie and Freddie private entities? ProSense Aug 2013 #21
The knee jerk bashing of this plan is idiotic. sufrommich Aug 2013 #22
Your enthusiasm for privatization is noted. TBF Aug 2013 #23
No, it's not surprising. n/t ProSense Aug 2013 #24
Can we just save some time … 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #37
If formulated well, maybe I can see that working Xyzse Aug 2013 #25
To all your points, Fannie and Freddie are private. ProSense Aug 2013 #27
Not quite Xyzse Aug 2013 #30
No, ProSense Aug 2013 #32
You're still just focusing on that part Xyzse Aug 2013 #33
The USPS ProSense Aug 2013 #34
Thanks for finally adding a few links that mention Xyzse Aug 2013 #35
He can't guarantee any of this shit leftstreet Aug 2013 #26
Obama wants his own "Glass Steagall" to call his own. When he is gone, we will all sit around and... Safetykitten Aug 2013 #28
But ProSense Aug 2013 #29
Watching people talk past each other in this thread Bunnahabhain Aug 2013 #31
K & R Scurrilous Aug 2013 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FACT SHEET: A Better Barg...»Reply #33