Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Greenwald to Reuters: "many more revelations on spying by the U.S. government" to come [View all]Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)29. Hahahaha
Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority
On 18 November 2010 the Stockholm District Court upheld an arrest warrant against Assange on suspicion of rape, unlawful coercion and three cases of sexual molestation.[2] The warrant was appealed to the Svea Court of Appeal which upheld it but lowered it to suspicion of rape of a lesser degree, unlawful coercion and two cases of sexual molestation rather than three, [3][4] and the warrant was also appealed to the Supreme Court of Sweden,[5] which decided not to hear the case. At this time Assange had been living in the United Kingdom for 12 months. An extradition hearing took place in an English court in February 2011 to consider an application by Swedish authorities for the extradition of Assange to Sweden. The outcome of the hearing was announced on 24 February 2011, when the extradition warrant was upheld. Assange appealed to the High Court, and on 2 November 2011, the court upheld the extradition decision and rejected all four grounds for the appeal as presented by Assange's legal representatives. £19,000 costs was also awarded against Assange. On 5 December 2011, Assange was refused permission by the High Court to appeal to the Supreme Court. The High Court certified that his case raised a point of law of general public importance. The Supreme Court subsequently granted permission to appeal,[6] and heard the appeal on 1 and 2 February 2012.[7] The court reserved its judgment and dismissed the appeal on 30 May 2012.[8] Assange has said the investigation is "without basis". He remained on conditional bail in the United Kingdom[9][10][11] until on 19 June 2012 Assange sought refuge at Ecuador's Embassy in London and was granted temporary asylum. On 16 August 2012 he was granted full asylum by the Ecuadorian government.
On 18 November 2010 the Stockholm District Court upheld an arrest warrant against Assange on suspicion of rape, unlawful coercion and three cases of sexual molestation.[2] The warrant was appealed to the Svea Court of Appeal which upheld it but lowered it to suspicion of rape of a lesser degree, unlawful coercion and two cases of sexual molestation rather than three, [3][4] and the warrant was also appealed to the Supreme Court of Sweden,[5] which decided not to hear the case. At this time Assange had been living in the United Kingdom for 12 months. An extradition hearing took place in an English court in February 2011 to consider an application by Swedish authorities for the extradition of Assange to Sweden. The outcome of the hearing was announced on 24 February 2011, when the extradition warrant was upheld. Assange appealed to the High Court, and on 2 November 2011, the court upheld the extradition decision and rejected all four grounds for the appeal as presented by Assange's legal representatives. £19,000 costs was also awarded against Assange. On 5 December 2011, Assange was refused permission by the High Court to appeal to the Supreme Court. The High Court certified that his case raised a point of law of general public importance. The Supreme Court subsequently granted permission to appeal,[6] and heard the appeal on 1 and 2 February 2012.[7] The court reserved its judgment and dismissed the appeal on 30 May 2012.[8] Assange has said the investigation is "without basis". He remained on conditional bail in the United Kingdom[9][10][11] until on 19 June 2012 Assange sought refuge at Ecuador's Embassy in London and was granted temporary asylum. On 16 August 2012 he was granted full asylum by the Ecuadorian government.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Greenwald to Reuters: "many more revelations on spying by the U.S. government" to come [View all]
99th_Monkey
Aug 2013
OP
Probably not wise to announce these things in advance. Julian Assange made that mistake
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#1
I quite agree, about making such "announcements" in advance of "new revelations"
99th_Monkey
Aug 2013
#4
Well, I think he meant that Snowden only sent the leaks to both of them. He did say
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#16
You know 'many people who think he is a saint'?? Wow, no one I know ever viewed him as
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#15
Wrong again. The arrest warrant has nothing to do with ' charges of rape' a word so overused in this
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#27
I know!! If I had known he was 'dirty', hadn't take a bath etc, I would never have believed
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#40
Lol, not where it counts, in CONGRESS. We finally have what we expected five years ago,
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#17
And he lives in Brazil and he has boxes in his garage, no, that is the other guy
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#42
Okay, so maybe he knew that Wikileaks is under surveillance due to the Wall St. Criminals
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#37
Do you really think bogging people down in endless babble bolsters your argument?
Cali_Democrat
Aug 2013
#41
For the obvious reason that he has stated dozens of times and that you already know.
DesMoinesDem
Aug 2013
#26
Funny I would have thought that you of all people, would know the answer to that question
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#49
So how would he know these are 'revelations' if he hadn't already reviewed them?
randome
Aug 2013
#64
Documents so critical to our freedom that they only trickle out to maximize profits for the author.
millennialmax
Aug 2013
#48
I wouldn't waste time 'sliming' GG. I've read the definition of displacement theory. eom
millennialmax
Aug 2013
#53
As always, you've got the last, most elegant word. Hey, I've got an idea!1 Let's you and me
UTUSN
Aug 2013
#68
Edward Snowden is a modern day Paul Revere with a thumb drive full of news that Tyranny is coming!
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Aug 2013
#66