Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WingDinger

(3,690 posts)
2. YOUR logic is faulty.
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 10:47 AM
Feb 2012

Just because gay and womens brains are similar, does NOT prove that sexual orientation is inborn. Brains change, according to what they think.

If being gay was a choice, it would likely occur, how I was taught. About two, various factors go into what gender you find appealing, in a sexual type way. So, it being a choice, is moot. You wont change that association. Now, any attempts to change that at around two, should be discouraged. For there is no impairment to choosing either way.

I think that leaving it as a choice is judged as dangerous to our desire to guarantee equal rights. Many feel that inborn sexual orientation can give protected minority status to gays. I think that mainstreaming sexual orientation that is gay is the goal. Even thinking in terms of protected minority, is antithetical to that goal.

As far as I am concerned, all persons are created equal. And, all persons are allowed THEIR pursuit of happiness. And the chosen moniker, gay fits well with happiness.




"""""The choice myth also fuels a pseudo-scientific practice known as "reparative therapy"""""""

We should not allow social threats dictate our science.





""""""According to Dr. Qazi Rahman, a professor of cognitive biology at Queen Mary University of London, these differences can only be formed during the fetal period, which indicates "if you are gay - you are born gay." """



I dont know if I buy that yet.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I would think it is safeinOhio Feb 2012 #1
They'd probably explain it using words such as "Satan" RyanPsych Feb 2012 #4
YOUR logic is faulty. WingDinger Feb 2012 #2
According to *actual* neuroscientists RyanPsych Feb 2012 #3
Yeah, I know, I have that digit thingie. But am not gay. WingDinger Feb 2012 #5
Never in the article, or the linked studies do they content a 1:1 link RyanPsych Feb 2012 #9
So when did you choose to be straight? justiceischeap Feb 2012 #6
Best I can remember, I cant remember. WingDinger Feb 2012 #7
Because 2-year olds question their sexuality? RyanPsych Feb 2012 #8
No, they dont question their sexuality. WingDinger Feb 2012 #11
by comprehending the fact that human sexuality isn't binary RyanPsych Feb 2012 #12
That would not be CHOOSING, it would be UNCHOOSING, and that has been deemed bogus. WingDinger Feb 2012 #16
At this point- I'm just going to assume that you're a troll RyanPsych Feb 2012 #17
No, I am not a troll. I am pro gay marriage. I am pro whateverthehellyouchoose. WingDinger Feb 2012 #19
The Xianistas rail against gay rights because they say being gay is "a choice," stopbush Feb 2012 #10
I can answer that. WingDinger Feb 2012 #13
So the elderly, the infertile, and those who dont want children shouldn't get married? RyanPsych Feb 2012 #18
I believe that gay and lesbian parents canbe/are as good of parents. WingDinger Feb 2012 #20
you're making the unfortunate mistake of thinking that they need a rationale RyanPsych Feb 2012 #15
That wasn't "quick", but it is correct. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #14
Are you willing to base equal rights for gays on gayness being inborn? Or on the CON? WingDinger Feb 2012 #21
I just think everyone should be considered equal. It simplifies things. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #22
Excellent. WingDinger Feb 2012 #23
A trap and the right's framing of the issue Spike89 Feb 2012 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Quick Scientific Facts Th...»Reply #2