Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DerBeppo

(455 posts)
5. I don't see anything wrong with this in theory
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 12:46 PM
Feb 2012

In practice, it might be a different story, but I'm not willing to throw something that is educational and useful just because there might be misuse.

My literature students have a very difficult time getting through some very significant texts due primarily to their lack of understanding when it comes to Biblical and historical allusions. It is difficult to teach Shakespeare or Chaucer when students have no idea about some of the underpinnings of those writers' philosophical structures. In fact, most of the time, even the random fundy student has only a surface level understanding of Biblical figures, stories or passages.

I know this isn't the intent of the legislation, but I'm counting on the law of unintended consequences (and the, pardon the pun, devilishness of some of the more intelligent students) will make these classes more intellectually satisfying.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bible class in public hig...»Reply #5