Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

rec'd to complete the record. nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #1
Shame on them for misrepresenting Mr. Lewis. millennialmax Aug 2013 #2
I repeat: Spreading "disinformation" about or against President Obama is a core value for the kelliekat44 Aug 2013 #55
They've misrepresented everything else, why is one more thing surprising? baldguy Aug 2013 #80
From this little contretemps, we have learned, decisively, that the GUARDIAN is a stenographer for MADem Aug 2013 #83
Oh well BeyondGeography Aug 2013 #3
Scoot over. bunnies Aug 2013 #4
scooch over AtomicKitten Aug 2013 #31
Sweet! bunnies Aug 2013 #35
How did I miss this one? Rex Aug 2013 #174
Rec for accuracy riqster Aug 2013 #5
Objectively, it sounds like Lewis didn't put his own comments in context when speaking geek tragedy Aug 2013 #6
k&r avaistheone1 Aug 2013 #26
That is what it sounds like to me also nt Mojorabbit Aug 2013 #49
well dang hfojvt Aug 2013 #51
You obviously don't know much about John Lewis then nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #59
It wouldn't be accurate if they left out qualifying sentences or put his sentences in a different pnwmom Aug 2013 #57
Huh? Not the GUARDIAN's fault? Wasn't there a "reporter" in the room? MADem Aug 2013 #84
"The Guardian" took "Praise out of the headline", today.. what does that Cha Aug 2013 #97
I blame the Guardian. I wondered yesterday about them having Cha Aug 2013 #95
Sounds to me like they asked him a question about the March on Washington, and then they asked MADem Aug 2013 #100
That sounds exactly how it went down. freshwest Aug 2013 #162
It sounds to me like they conflated. MADem Aug 2013 #128
+1,000. There it is, one percent media darling propaganda, well paid to do so, too. freshwest Aug 2013 #163
For those that have followed … 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #141
They think if you call 'em racist they know the pain of the oppressed and the yoke of slavery. freshwest Aug 2013 #165
OMG! The NSA is blackmailing John Lewis too???? Where will it end? randome Aug 2013 #7
Snowden fans at the Guardian ProSense Aug 2013 #8
Guardian has lost some credibility lately. moondust Aug 2013 #9
But … 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #142
This is pure damage control Capt. Obvious Aug 2013 #10
And the first True Progressive throws John Lewis under the bus! geek tragedy Aug 2013 #16
The "under the bus" accusers are the first ones to actually DO so. CakeGrrl Aug 2013 #52
I said his remark was deranged treestar Aug 2013 #70
If they make him pay taxes in Russia, he'll scream he's being oppressed! freshwest Aug 2013 #166
Another good point treestar Aug 2013 #167
Actually, it's just the opposite. I'll get back to you tomorrow. freshwest Aug 2013 #186
I'm always ready to learn! treestar Aug 2013 #188
Obviously not. The only objections on DU and other Progressives sites Cha Aug 2013 #98
Have you also considered the possiblity he was misrepresented? hrmjustin Aug 2013 #126
Really? … 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #143
Congressmen like to "revise and extend" their remarks. former9thward Aug 2013 #11
Without seeing the transcript, we do not know what he said. We don't know what words might have pnwmom Aug 2013 #54
Well since he did not make those charges former9thward Aug 2013 #56
It could be technically "accurate" and still leave out important context and qualifiers pnwmom Aug 2013 #58
The Reporter STUCK HIS QUESTION in the MIDDLE of what DevonRex Aug 2013 #99
Evidently Representative Lewis' Bus Position Index has now been revised to Not Under Fumesucker Aug 2013 #12
Will this get a brazillian recs? ProSense Aug 2013 #13
Predicting is hard Fumesucker Aug 2013 #15
No, he's now under the bus of the True Progressives. geek tragedy Aug 2013 #14
So you say Rep Lewis Bus Position Status has not changed and he's under the bus? Fumesucker Aug 2013 #17
He was under no bus yesterday. geek tragedy Aug 2013 #19
Who the hell would do that? Capt. Obvious Aug 2013 #25
. geek tragedy Aug 2013 #27
Link doesn't work Capt. Obvious Aug 2013 #29
Link works just fine. nt BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #32
have yourself on ignore? nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #39
You are needed in the Sanjay Gupta thread Fumesucker Aug 2013 #43
I'm a fan of the obvious Capt. Obvious Aug 2013 #45
Obviously Fumesucker Aug 2013 #47
I'm responsible for my own words and that's it Fumesucker Aug 2013 #28
I wonder if BBI and G4A were the same person nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #37
BBI didn't tie my optic nerves in knots trying to decypher word sausage Fumesucker Aug 2013 #46
Unless BBI was the more accurate manifestation of the person's beliefs geek tragedy Aug 2013 #62
Anything is possible of course, this is the internet Fumesucker Aug 2013 #66
BBI tended to post an article and that was all treestar Aug 2013 #71
This message was self-deleted by its author DevonRex Aug 2013 #104
Daffy kpete Aug 2013 #22
Here's an example why many of us would/should never do that in the first place BeyondGeography Aug 2013 #23
Nobody believed The Guardian yesterday, just like nobody believes DevonRex Aug 2013 #93
Exactly, those horrible liberals, warping everything to their viewpoint Fumesucker Aug 2013 #107
LOL. DevonRex Aug 2013 #114
You reply to a point I didn't make Fumesucker Aug 2013 #122
Does this mean the Guardian... gulp... LIED? BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #18
Put their partisan spin on it nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #20
What else is new? It's one step above The Daily Mail. eom millennialmax Aug 2013 #33
K & R. n/t FSogol Aug 2013 #21
R#13 & K for, nothing to hmmmmm about!1 n/t UTUSN Aug 2013 #24
but please, UTUSN kpete Aug 2013 #30
Sure he did. Then he stuck that question in the middle for the article. DevonRex Aug 2013 #145
Media spin is in full swing Life Long Dem Aug 2013 #34
Why the hell is Snowden still a story? djean111 Aug 2013 #36
Perhaps you missed the big "John Lewis proclaims Snowden our generation's Rosa Parks" geek tragedy Aug 2013 #38
I saw them. djean111 Aug 2013 #42
Takes two to tango on it. geek tragedy Aug 2013 #44
A need for heroes and villains, archetypes I think Joseph Campbell calls them Fumesucker Aug 2013 #53
Policy is boring. Requires attention to details, putting things in context, and dealing in geek tragedy Aug 2013 #63
I saw a couple of threads yesterday.. and decided not to comment Peacetrain Aug 2013 #40
A good rule of thumb to use. randome Aug 2013 #68
Hey Peacetrain~ I commented several times that Cha Aug 2013 #92
Hi Cha.. The Guardian Peacetrain Aug 2013 #144
.. Cha Aug 2013 #148
My sentiments exactly. Progressives take heed. Blue State Bandit Aug 2013 #41
"if you can't do the time, don't do the crime." zeemike Aug 2013 #50
It means if you choose to do the crime, you had better be prepared to do the time. Blue State Bandit Aug 2013 #69
I don't think Snoweden was suprised by it. zeemike Aug 2013 #78
Are you saying they were barred from leaving the country? Blue State Bandit Aug 2013 #87
What you think the Freedom Riders rode the bus zeemike Aug 2013 #108
Missing my point... on purpose? Blue State Bandit Aug 2013 #170
How was the KKK trying to shape public opinion? zeemike Aug 2013 #172
You are completely misconstruing my argument. KKK and the Freedom Riders are Juxtaposed... Blue State Bandit Aug 2013 #175
"Snow den is to Ellsberg as KKK is to Freedom Riders" zeemike Aug 2013 #177
Love how you misrepresent my argument in the title line... Blue State Bandit Aug 2013 #179
I misrepresented them by quoting you? zeemike Aug 2013 #180
out of context. Blue State Bandit Aug 2013 #181
Yeah, it is Snowden's fault the powerful aren't held to account. TheKentuckian Aug 2013 #182
But 2 months later, we are left squabbling over insufficient information... Blue State Bandit Aug 2013 #183
So the not being able to hold the powerful accountable section can be nixed? TheKentuckian Aug 2013 #187
It looks like "they" got to him and forced him to walk back his comments. totodeinhere Aug 2013 #48
No, it looks like the Guardian is acting more and more like the other British tabloids. pnwmom Aug 2013 #64
Considering that Lewis and everyone in his family may be under surveillance, OnyxCollie Aug 2013 #65
What an utterly deranged comment. nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #73
It must hurt to be that paranoid. eom millennialmax Aug 2013 #74
no brains, no headaches nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #76
LOL. millennialmax Aug 2013 #77
It hurts to reply to stupid people. OnyxCollie Aug 2013 #151
Take it to "Creative Speculation" if you don't want to be challenged. emulatorloo Aug 2013 #168
prosecution for what? treestar Aug 2013 #75
"Someone" made her plead guilty for taking bribes? BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #79
These are the same idiots who think that John Lewis is easily intimidated nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #86
I see the crew is out and about to call you crazy. zeemike Aug 2013 #82
The claim that the Obama administration is threatening to put John Lewis's family geek tragedy Aug 2013 #85
It's Insulting to Congressman Lewis and shows(once again) Cha Aug 2013 #106
Ah, the crew. OnyxCollie Aug 2013 #152
I'll bet that's true - the spooks got to him. n/t backscatter712 Aug 2013 #89
I'll bet only crazy people agree with you that John Lewis is lying because geek tragedy Aug 2013 #116
That was my first thought, as well. woo me with science Aug 2013 #96
Post removed Post removed Aug 2013 #115
The immediate resort to namecalling woo me with science Aug 2013 #136
Heh, you question John Lewis's integrity and courage and then geek tragedy Aug 2013 #138
Oh, my. woo me with science Aug 2013 #150
Oh yeah, more paranoid conspiracy theories from the snowden crowd. Cha Aug 2013 #101
No, it's a matter of simple logic re: motives. woo me with science Aug 2013 #110
The MOTIVE is the slimy Guardian reporter USED an interview with DevonRex Aug 2013 #119
That slimeball reporter got in the door by saying he wanted to interview him about the fiftieth MADem Aug 2013 #124
GMTA. I just wrote a long post saying that. DevonRex Aug 2013 #127
Yep--they GAMED the guy, they lied about the purpose of the interview (March on Washington) and MADem Aug 2013 #129
Lewis is not claiming the quotes were fabricated. He's saying they were taken out of context geek tragedy Aug 2013 #120
What's OOC is the QUESTION. The reporter stuck it in where it DevonRex Aug 2013 #135
I think the "they" here is Democrats burnodo Aug 2013 #103
Amazing how you people throw John Lewis under the bus, call him a liar, and then geek tragedy Aug 2013 #118
So why did he walk back his comments? burnodo Aug 2013 #147
He didn't "walk back" a thing BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #157
Under the bus Lewis goes? ecstatic Aug 2013 #133
No, see reply #184 n/t totodeinhere Aug 2013 #185
Are you saying he is a liar? hrmjustin Aug 2013 #134
No this certainly does not rise to that level. He is a man of totodeinhere Aug 2013 #184
As The Guardian Spins~ sheshe2 Aug 2013 #60
"The Guardian" and "misleading" in the same sentence? Quelle Surprise! Tarheel_Dem Aug 2013 #61
DU rec...nt SidDithers Aug 2013 #67
i agree some of the news reports made him sound more supportive than he was Enrique Aug 2013 #72
Oh dear--I said this yesterday, and was personally insulted for comprehending the obvious. MADem Aug 2013 #81
You will largely hear crickets from the insulting, attack crowd. CakeGrrl Aug 2013 #105
Never mind that the "reporter" (I use quotes because that's debatable) wasn't interviewing Rep Lewis MADem Aug 2013 #112
Hey move over.. Cha Aug 2013 #109
I knew he was going to correct the record. I just didn't know how. MADem Aug 2013 #111
Thank goodness in a way that this has been Cha Aug 2013 #113
These same morons are now claiming that Lewis is lying and that the reason geek tragedy Aug 2013 #117
Anyone who has ever been in the presence of John Lewis knows that's a bullshit argument! MADem Aug 2013 #121
Trolls, all of them. Seriously, anyone who talks that kind of shit about John Lewis is geek tragedy Aug 2013 #123
Certainly not walking the "progressive" walk, at a minimum...! nt MADem Aug 2013 #125
We've been chatting about this in the AA forum. I'm surprised you weren't there! Number23 Aug 2013 #130
I'll get over there--I said it yesterday; I knew Lewis wasn't jumping on the Yeah Eddie bandwagon. MADem Aug 2013 #131
Freaky--a double post--I rarely see those in DU3...happened all the time in DU2... MADem Aug 2013 #131
"Claim a Negro" is exactly right. I guess the "I have a Black friend" and the "Cornel West msanthrope Aug 2013 #137
Somebody tried to "invoke" Corny too! Thread sank like a damn stone. Number23 Aug 2013 #146
The ODS of the emoprogs has never been shriller and funnier--I can only imagine the msanthrope Aug 2013 #149
Interesting. blackspade Aug 2013 #88
It was The Guardian. Anyone with half a brain CELL knew Lewis DevonRex Aug 2013 #90
Never said what? cthulu2016 Aug 2013 #91
Never said: ProSense Aug 2013 #94
Thank you for posting this. hrmjustin Aug 2013 #102
Let's see... Oilwellian Aug 2013 #139
Don’t Ya Just Hate … 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #140
Don't you just love it... Cha Aug 2013 #156
It's becoming ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #161
" It's becoming .. " Capt. Obvious Aug 2013 #164
John Lewis is a hero of mine. BlueCheese Aug 2013 #153
I wonder who talked to him and what they said. JDPriestly Aug 2013 #154
Looks Like The Party Le Taz Hot Aug 2013 #155
No. Looks like the Guardian engages in "yellow journalism" and gullible folks bought it. nt BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #158
You're new to politics, aren't you? Le Taz Hot Aug 2013 #159
No and you're naive about propaganda. nt BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #160
Quite the opposite. Le Taz Hot Aug 2013 #169
I don't subscribe to woo conspiracy theories or their purveyors. nt BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #171
Some can't understand the difference between supporting reform and Snowden. n/t ProSense Aug 2013 #176
Exactly. nt BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #178
Well well well... Rex Aug 2013 #173
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rep. John Lewis: "NO PRAI...»Reply #89