Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 401(K)s Are A Sham - Salon [View all]Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)35. I wouldn't say that
I would just say they are a bad investment for most people.
Better to invest the principal yourself and live off the returns exclusively. It's not necessarily going to pay you as much per month, but you get to retain the principal for however you decide to bequeath it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
One of my friends is a tax accountant and he says that annuities are a very, very bad investment.
avaistheone1
Aug 2013
#28
Every state has a guarantee association (SGA) which insures qualified annuities
Major Nikon
Aug 2013
#40
So if the company fails, there is no federal guarantee, but I could depend on the State of Texas?
jtuck004
Aug 2013
#41
AIG. Remember them? Texas company, thousands of annuities and life insurnace holders screwed
jtuck004
Aug 2013
#46
Not even one policy holder was screwed and none were ever at risk at any time
Major Nikon
Aug 2013
#49
The fucking insurance commissioner was about to place them in receivership, unless you want to
jtuck004
Aug 2013
#50
I have done quite well with my 401k. But I still have a Defined Benefit Pension for most of my
doc03
Aug 2013
#2
The New Low Wage Part Time Economy By The GOP Won't Fund LIfe Let Alone A 401K
TheMastersNemesis
Aug 2013
#4
Combined with stagnated wages, rising expenses and an anemic stock market failure is assured.
geckosfeet
Aug 2013
#9
One way or another, we have to transfer $2.5 trillion from workers to retirees over the next 20 yrs
Recursion
Aug 2013
#15
Just a shell game to fund the wallstreet gamblers with money so they could play with it
SoCalDem
Aug 2013
#16