Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 Aug 2013 #1
Thanks for posting! FiveGoodMen Aug 2013 #2
Candidate says one thing, does another when President!!!!!! geek tragedy Aug 2013 #3
To this degree, 180* <-- is breathtaking & noteworthy imho ~nt 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #5
Should we call the Nobel committee again? darkangel218 Aug 2013 #6
Do as you wish, but when searching for the number, it will be under: Nobel Committee. eom millennialmax Aug 2013 #10
Still the same " committee" darkangel218 Aug 2013 #12
Then you haven't paid close attention to Presidential history. geek tragedy Aug 2013 #7
"They all do it" <-- in defense of the indefensible eom 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #8
meh, the realities of governing are a lot different than those geek tragedy Aug 2013 #9
You mean those "realities" of governing that some have died trying to change 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #13
no, the reality that talk is cheap, and that not all promises will or can be realized nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #18
But, but .. what about my pony? 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #25
Those who lie to get... onyourleft Aug 2013 #40
It's been said right here on DU that sometimes you need to lie in order to have the chance cherokeeprogressive Aug 2013 #50
Watch the video ... the "candidate" doesn't say what the OP claims. JoePhilly Aug 2013 #23
We are not spying on American people!! darkangel218 Aug 2013 #4
I think you are just misunderstanding the rhetoric. When he said "we" he meant him and Bo. nm rhett o rick Aug 2013 #11
So POTUS has no say in it? lol!!!!!! darkangel218 Aug 2013 #14
I am beginning to believe he has no say in it. rhett o rick Aug 2013 #20
I dont believe it. darkangel218 Aug 2013 #24
Without disparaging the President you should be able to see rhett o rick Aug 2013 #45
He already has pardoned them. nt darkangel218 Aug 2013 #47
No link? rhett o rick Aug 2013 #56
I'd vote for that guy. progressoid Aug 2013 #15
The OP you mean? darkangel218 Aug 2013 #16
Lucy has a football she wants you to kick. eom 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #17
You sarcasm so noted. I did vote for that guy. I wouldnt vote for the guy we ended up with. nm rhett o rick Aug 2013 #46
I wanted to believe it, but knew I shouldn't. I was right. GalaxyHunter Aug 2013 #19
Holding an elected official accountable for campaign promises is unAmerican. nm rhett o rick Aug 2013 #21
The video you posted does not show what you claim. JoePhilly Aug 2013 #22
Context is everything, isn't it? greatauntoftriplets Aug 2013 #27
Not around here these days. nt JoePhilly Aug 2013 #29
Context Shmontext. NSA aside, 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #28
Which of those refers to transparency in the legislative process? JoePhilly Aug 2013 #30
"The legislative process" 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #34
The ugly truth. You should make this an OP. nt woo me with science Aug 2013 #36
True, he didn't say "completely" as the OP states. progressoid Aug 2013 #32
An honest OP would have referred to those and provided JoePhilly Aug 2013 #33
This took about two minutes.... progressoid Aug 2013 #35
Hummm ... JoePhilly Aug 2013 #37
Missing the point again. progressoid Aug 2013 #41
You sure showed him. great white snark Aug 2013 #26
Nixon gave politics a rule, "Say whatever it takes to get elected first." Coyotl Aug 2013 #31
I don't know whether to laugh MissDeeds Aug 2013 #38
That's how I felt too, watching the video. it was painful. nt 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #39
But...we are told he really didn't say that...we only heard it and interpreted it KoKo Aug 2013 #42
Yes, I do believe you're 100% correct 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #43
Indeed.. KoKo Aug 2013 #44
Candidate Obama debates President Obama on the police/surveillance state. woo me with science Aug 2013 #48
"No more National Security letters to spy on American Citizens WHO ARE NOT SUSPECTED OF A CRIME." cherokeeprogressive Aug 2013 #53
Maybe he meant "transparent" as in "invisible". You know, like secret laws. /nt Marr Aug 2013 #49
CNN BREAKING: GOVERNMENT PROMISES TO DO BETTER! Rex Aug 2013 #51
Stay out of the darkness Mr. President. Sunlight is the greatest disinfectant. Very well said sir! Ed Suspicious Aug 2013 #52
Mind you, they will need to take special, extraconstitutional measures to KEEP YOU SAFE FROM TERRRUR Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #54
Who CARES what PO says? He doesn't make those decisions. People like Sen. Feinstein do. cherokeeprogressive Aug 2013 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING: Obama promises ...»Reply #48