Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
8. More precisely, they're divided on that point.
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 01:27 AM
Aug 2013

One faction within birtherism has decided, on the basis of no textual authority in the Constitution itself, that eligibility for the presidency is restricted to people who were born in the United States AND both of whose parents were citizens at the time. McCain and Cruz were born outside the United States. Bobby Jindal and Marco Rubio were born in the United States to noncitizen parents. Some birthers hold all four of these men to be ineligible.

For the anti-Obama birthers, the advantage of this viewpoint is that they don't need to embrace the foolishness of the Kenyan birth theory. They can concede that Obama was born in Honolulu and still deny his eligibility because he had one noncitizen parent.

Nevertheless, I think the "mainstream" birthers (that's like getting "logical" and "Orly Taitz" into the same sentence) concede that their case depends on the theory of foreign birth. Their view is not inconsistent with the view that all four Republicans mentioned above are eligible.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm impressed. Jackpine Radical Aug 2013 #1
LOL brer cat Aug 2013 #6
Never expect a nutcase to apply logic to their position. hobbit709 Aug 2013 #2
Not entirely accurate. Spider Jerusalem Aug 2013 #3
Thanks very much for pointing this out. Jim Lane Aug 2013 #7
hate trumps logic on a daily basis spanone Aug 2013 #4
The Birthers think that Cruz is not eligible hack89 Aug 2013 #5
More precisely, they're divided on that point. Jim Lane Aug 2013 #8
Logic is completely beyond Oily Titz. Zoeisright Aug 2013 #9
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Logical Exercise for Or...»Reply #8