Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Wyden, Udall vindicated: Obama Admin Caught LYING? [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)4. No, and it doesn't give permission. In the
footnote and the article, it states specifically that it's prohibited.
"While the FAA 702 minimization procedures approved on 3 October 2011 now allow for use of certain United States person names and identifiers as query terms when reviewing collected FAA 702 data," the glossary states, "analysts may NOT/NOT (not repeat not) implement any USP (US persons) queries until an effective oversight process has been developed by NSA and agreed to by DOJ/ODNI (Office of the Director of National Intelligence)."
<...>
The document which is undated, though metadata suggests this version was last updated in June 2012 does not say whether the oversight process it mentions has been established or whether any searches against US person names have taken place.
<...>
The document which is undated, though metadata suggests this version was last updated in June 2012 does not say whether the oversight process it mentions has been established or whether any searches against US person names have taken place.
Also, this is the foreign program not the NSA domestic programs.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nope. The Patriot Act requires data collection be relevant to a specific authorized investigation.
limpyhobbler
Aug 2013
#66
you might as well as try to convince a "saved" fundamentalist Christian that the Bible is not the
Douglas Carpenter
Aug 2013
#8
This is how they reign in the internets! They own the mass media except for the net!
Dustlawyer
Aug 2013
#19