Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'Eminent Domain for the People' Leaves Wall Street Furious [View all]Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)97. Yeah well, nobody IS going to be writing mortgages in Richmond CA
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-eminent-domain-lawsuit-20130809,0,6390434.story
As I pointed out in another reply, no one can afford to write a mortgage in a city that does this, and no one will. The end result will be a fall in property values and a disaster for the homeowners, plus urban blight.
This is truly one of the most insane proposals I have ever come across, and it doesn't do what people think it does - it removes the prospect of homeownership from all but the wealthy. If this is the way mortgages are to work, no one but an idiot will fund them. Instead, they will shift their investments to organizations like Black Rock, which will buy up properties on their own. The end result will be a nation of renters. And then we'll see how high rents will go.
The federal housing agency, which regulates Fannie and Freddie, on Thursday made clear it doesn't intend to let this happen. The agency said it would instruct Fannie and Freddie to "limit, restrict or cease business activities" in any jurisdiction using eminent domain to seize mortgages.
The move would be a "huge blow" to the city of Richmond, said Guy Cecala, publisher of Inside Mortgage Finance.
"It is pretty much a death sentence these days in terms of mortgage financing," Cecala said. "It is sort of an atom bomb solution, and the real question is would they pull the trigger on it, or is it just a threat? But it is the kind of thing they could do fairly quickly."
The move would be a "huge blow" to the city of Richmond, said Guy Cecala, publisher of Inside Mortgage Finance.
"It is pretty much a death sentence these days in terms of mortgage financing," Cecala said. "It is sort of an atom bomb solution, and the real question is would they pull the trigger on it, or is it just a threat? But it is the kind of thing they could do fairly quickly."
As I pointed out in another reply, no one can afford to write a mortgage in a city that does this, and no one will. The end result will be a fall in property values and a disaster for the homeowners, plus urban blight.
This is truly one of the most insane proposals I have ever come across, and it doesn't do what people think it does - it removes the prospect of homeownership from all but the wealthy. If this is the way mortgages are to work, no one but an idiot will fund them. Instead, they will shift their investments to organizations like Black Rock, which will buy up properties on their own. The end result will be a nation of renters. And then we'll see how high rents will go.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
101 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The banks were essentially clearcutting whern they made loans that were unaffordable
Skink
Aug 2013
#4
Straw Man. Also, prudent fund managers are more than aware of the current risk factors
Ikonoklast
Aug 2013
#72
What would be really wild is for Detroit to declare eminent domain over it's distressed areas...
Spitfire of ATJ
Aug 2013
#10
Homesteading requires you buy the property to live on it as your primary residence....
Spitfire of ATJ
Aug 2013
#25
Eminent domain can allow the city a wide lattitude to seize the property....
Spitfire of ATJ
Aug 2013
#37
I actually have been looking at property in Detroit as an investment the last few weeks
Lee-Lee
Aug 2013
#19
I don't even think they'd need to used eminent domain. They could probably seize a lot ...
JVS
Aug 2013
#52
"Make it so banks are not legally allowed to give out such unstable loans"
SomethingFishy
Aug 2013
#21
"We're better off. Even if it doesn't feel like that right now. Our future is better off."
Gravitycollapse
Aug 2013
#31
If Obama gets rid of Fannie and Freddie and someone wants to take a loan from this area
dkf
Aug 2013
#63
"will any lenders be willing to make loans in these cities going forward,". Good. Fuck 'em.
jtuck004
Aug 2013
#38
Guess what? People have always had trouble leaving the plantation - this is nothing new.
jtuck004
Aug 2013
#40
It's always a drag when thieves are involved, everyone may lose. Pensioners may get less, but
jtuck004
Aug 2013
#83
Well this is another mortgage maker with a guaranteed profit through government seizure.
dkf
Aug 2013
#84
The real estate market is recovering. This is exactly the type of action that will hit it.
dkf
Aug 2013
#87
Without the 85 billion the government is throwing in, which is primarly bolstering
jtuck004
Aug 2013
#92
Maybe our credit unions will make the loans. We should nationalize the big banks.
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#81
If that's a small credit union more specific to that area you've just damaged them significantly.
dkf
Aug 2013
#82
Well, until this is cleared up I wonder who's going to be making loans in Richmond?
Yo_Mama
Aug 2013
#61