Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)NYT editorial: Snowden's "fears do not qualify him for asylum" [View all]
Whats the Point of a Summit?
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
President Obama is expected to decide soon whether to proceed with a planned summit meeting with President Vladimir Putin of Russia in Moscow next month. At the moment, the answer should be no.
On top of all the other legitimate grievances with Mr. Putins policies came his decision to essentially stick a thumb in Mr. Obamas eye by granting asylum to Edward Snowden, the man who disclosed to the world the National Security Agency sweeps of Americans telephone records. The Obama administration had urged Mr. Putin not to grant Mr. Snowden asylum.
<...>
Russias decision was provocative. Asylum is for people who are afraid to return to their own country because they fear persecution, unlawful imprisonment or even death because of their race, their ethnicity, their religion, their membership in particular social or political groups, or their political beliefs.
Mr. Snowden undoubtedly fears returning home because he would be arrested and prosecuted. But those fears do not qualify him for asylum. And does he really feel safer in a country where Mr. Putin, an increasingly authoritarian leader, has jailed and persecuted his critics?
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/07/opinion/whats-the-point-of-a-summit.html
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
President Obama is expected to decide soon whether to proceed with a planned summit meeting with President Vladimir Putin of Russia in Moscow next month. At the moment, the answer should be no.
On top of all the other legitimate grievances with Mr. Putins policies came his decision to essentially stick a thumb in Mr. Obamas eye by granting asylum to Edward Snowden, the man who disclosed to the world the National Security Agency sweeps of Americans telephone records. The Obama administration had urged Mr. Putin not to grant Mr. Snowden asylum.
<...>
Russias decision was provocative. Asylum is for people who are afraid to return to their own country because they fear persecution, unlawful imprisonment or even death because of their race, their ethnicity, their religion, their membership in particular social or political groups, or their political beliefs.
Mr. Snowden undoubtedly fears returning home because he would be arrested and prosecuted. But those fears do not qualify him for asylum. And does he really feel safer in a country where Mr. Putin, an increasingly authoritarian leader, has jailed and persecuted his critics?
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/07/opinion/whats-the-point-of-a-summit.html
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Even today Prosense will not admit Snowden changed the discussion. Sad. Pitiful. n-t
Logical
Aug 2013
#16
You can hate and despise snowden. And still admit that he started a discussion that needed....
Logical
Aug 2013
#22
Obama can collect him and give him a ride back to the US on Airforce One!
Rosa Luxemburg
Aug 2013
#25
Fears should not qualify the government to violate the Constitutional rights of the American people
AppleBottom
Aug 2013
#31
"or their political beliefs" sounds like they undermined their own "argument"
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Aug 2013
#48
Depends on whether you consider prosecuting and possibly imprisoning a person for telling the truth
JDPriestly
Aug 2013
#53
If they don't want him speaking out overseas, then they should grant him amnesty and invite
JDPriestly
Aug 2013
#61