Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NYT editorial: Snowden's "fears do not qualify him for asylum" [View all]snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)55. I see it this way: putting that lone sentence out there without the
explanatory text around it makes Snowden's idealogies look aligned, e.g., with
Russia. It becomes a smear against his judgement. Snowden is simply giving
the countries mentioned credit in this instance of offerring support and asylum
in light of the pressures of the powerful (U.S.) over the powerless (himself).
Yet even in the face of this historically disproportionate aggression, countries around the world have offered support and asylum. These nations, including Russia, Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua, and Ecuador have my gratitude and respect for being the first to stand against human rights violations carried out by the powerful rather than the powerless. By refusing to compromise their principles in the face of intimidation, they have earned the respect of the world. It is my intention to travel to each of these countries to extend my personal thanks to their people and leaders
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Even today Prosense will not admit Snowden changed the discussion. Sad. Pitiful. n-t
Logical
Aug 2013
#16
You can hate and despise snowden. And still admit that he started a discussion that needed....
Logical
Aug 2013
#22
Obama can collect him and give him a ride back to the US on Airforce One!
Rosa Luxemburg
Aug 2013
#25
Fears should not qualify the government to violate the Constitutional rights of the American people
AppleBottom
Aug 2013
#31
"or their political beliefs" sounds like they undermined their own "argument"
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Aug 2013
#48
Depends on whether you consider prosecuting and possibly imprisoning a person for telling the truth
JDPriestly
Aug 2013
#53
If they don't want him speaking out overseas, then they should grant him amnesty and invite
JDPriestly
Aug 2013
#61