Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Richardo

(38,391 posts)

8. So, let me get this straight:

Reply to one_voice (Original post)

Thu Feb 23, 2012, 09:44 PM

Feb 2012

Is he asserting that Barack Obama was born before the 14th amendment was ratified?

Or is he asserting that no part of the constitution adopted before the 14th amendment (bill of rights, etc) applies to those whose citizenship is defined under the 14th amendment?

fucking idiot.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Just when you think you've seen it all: Obama can't be president because he's 'mulatto' [View all] one_voice Feb 2012 OP

BSC!!!!! MADem Feb 2012 #1

w.t.f. obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #2

The stink that just will not go away. liberal N proud Feb 2012 #3

Isn't that a kind of coffee? immoderate Feb 2012 #4

Good grief! rexcat Feb 2012 #5

This stuff is as ugly as it is endless. AtomicKitten Feb 2012 #6

they just don't give up, do they? Terra Alta Feb 2012 #7

So, let me get this straight: Richardo Feb 2012 #8

He's trying to claim the 14th Amendment was not properly ratified csziggy Feb 2012 #15

By his logic, wouldn't the 13th also be invalid? ThoughtCriminal Feb 2012 #23

I don't know - I couldn't make it through all his garbage csziggy Feb 2012 #26

I have found when speaking with conservatives of the rw type me b zola Feb 2012 #37

I wouldn't be giving him and his ilk any ideas! liberalhistorian Feb 2012 #39

Apparently, he doesn't understand the meaning of the word "amendment" BattyDem Feb 2012 #25

Amazing. madamesilverspurs Feb 2012 #9

I don't even understand the "argument." Ohio Dem Feb 2012 #10

According to this genius, no one born outside the original 13 states could ever be President... Richardo Feb 2012 #11

Never mind that the Constitution gives clear instructions on the criteria liberalhistorian Feb 2012 #40

Hey! I have friends in the guano business and we're tired of this desecration of bat shit. saras Feb 2012 #12

a mulatto an albino a mosquito a libido athenasatanjesus Feb 2012 #13

'Nuff said. Chemisse Feb 2012 #14

yo, Gord-O... You say potato, I say potahto. You say mulatto... BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2012 #31

I don't believe in eugenics, but sometimes I wonder whether or not some people should be sterilized. JNathanK Feb 2012 #16

k&r for broader exposure to the nuts. No words either. uppityperson Feb 2012 #17

Mulatto? The last time I heard that word was in 1948.n/t Cleita Feb 2012 #18

I find it in some old census from about 1870 or so. csziggy Feb 2012 #27

Oy, the stupid, IT BURNS!!! Odin2005 Feb 2012 #19

Unfortunately it never burns the actual STOOPID. hobbit709 Feb 2012 #35

Well... 2labslib Feb 2012 #20

That was my thought. It is there plain as day. TheKentuckian Feb 2012 #28

I'm convinced that right wingholes are psychos nt Sarah Ibarruri Feb 2012 #21

No. Just racists. nt nanabugg Feb 2012 #22

Racist are psychos Obamacare Feb 2012 #33

Um ... that's why we have amendments! BattyDem Feb 2012 #24

The gloves are off now, it seems The Genealogist Feb 2012 #29

Every single birther suit and every single suit liberalhistorian Feb 2012 #32

Who is Gordon Warren Epperly? n/t friedgreentomatoes Feb 2012 #30

Black people have been here since before there was a United States. craigmatic Feb 2012 #34

He can park his feet under my table anytime he wants too madokie Feb 2012 #36

the [purported] ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, Kablooie Feb 2012 #38

Wtf is right. demmiblue Feb 2012 #41