Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He wouldn't have gotten whistleblower status, obviously Recursion Aug 2013 #1
Edward Snowden is a modern day Paul Revere with a thumb drive full of news that Tyranny is coming! usGovOwesUs3Trillion Aug 2013 #60
You're kind of a one trick pony, aren't you? struggle4progress Aug 2013 #136
"Legal"? Only in that it was written down and passed by a legislature Demeter Aug 2013 #73
Yes, "written down and passed by a legislature" describes "laws" Recursion Aug 2013 #77
Unconstitutional trumps legal Demeter Aug 2013 #93
I'm going to have to copy this post. Benton D Struckcheon Aug 2013 #94
Justice Roberts ssems to be in control of most things Rosa Luxemburg Aug 2013 #127
It's been noted--hence, he's not an independent judge Demeter Aug 2013 #128
The program's legality is obviously in dispute blackspade Aug 2013 #100
He wouldn't have been protected because he didn't bother to become a whistleblower. msanthrope Aug 2013 #2
Thomas Drake and others have used that act MannyGoldstein Aug 2013 #8
"How'd that work out for them?" ProSense Aug 2013 #12
2005 is irrelevant, ant the Tamm case is irrelevant because the programs themselves had not JDPriestly Aug 2013 #61
What? ProSense Aug 2013 #67
And here is why I object to the surveillance programs no matter who runs them JDPriestly Aug 2013 #119
Does the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1998... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #9
It does protect contractors. What it does not protect is release to the public--Snowden would have msanthrope Aug 2013 #13
Thanks very much... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #17
He could have gone to his favorite Senator, Rand Paul... MADem Aug 2013 #28
Yes, he could have done that... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #33
Why would it have to become public? MADem Aug 2013 #48
Why should what become public? ljm2002 Aug 2013 #64
You were the one who said MADem Aug 2013 #68
Yes, I said that... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #78
You brought up the public issue, not me. Yawn, indeed. nt MADem Aug 2013 #82
So you seem to be of the opinion... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #84
I seem to be of the opinion that classified material should not be shared MADem Aug 2013 #88
Okay, I understand that position... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #96
And how does congress provide oversight christx30 Aug 2013 #114
Even if it is procured illegally by th egovernment? Even if it runs afoul of the 4th Amendment? RC Aug 2013 #103
Yes, he should have done what Drake and Binney did. Drake followed the rules to the last letter and sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #37
And that is the problem with some kinds of government. Igel Aug 2013 #49
Greenwald did him a disservice BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #3
And you know this how? ljm2002 Aug 2013 #10
If you have "factual info" refuting what I wrote BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #15
I said nothing at all about... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #23
My remark underscores the hyperbole BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #42
In other words... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #44
In other words, it all flew over your head. Whoosh! nt BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #51
No, I asked you to support your assertion... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #69
Anything to do with FOREIGN spying BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #83
You are still evading the issue... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #86
You have evaded the facts. No help for you. Cry me a river. BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #89
No, I have questioned one statement you made... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #97
Dude, put the Snowden-basher-bots on ignore. backscatter712 Aug 2013 #90
I understand many are not persuadable on these issues... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #98
+1 blackspade Aug 2013 #107
Doesn't Greenwald also have a financial interest in the movie that filmmaker is crafting? nt MADem Aug 2013 #31
Good, I can't wait to read it. sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #38
"Greenwald already plans to publish his NSA book in March 2014" ROFL!!! Number23 Aug 2013 #131
He went to the Washington post first..nt Jesus Malverde Aug 2013 #75
What I meant by my remark... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #81
Proof that Rand Paul style libertarianism destroys minds. tridim Aug 2013 #4
wow, kpete Aug 2013 #5
I stopped reading at "..buried under the Capital"... tridim Aug 2013 #7
Where ABC seems to miss the difference between "Capital" and "Capitol" BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #19
Keep reading. You'll sound less uninformed leftstreet Aug 2013 #40
It's a pun that can't be written. Igel Aug 2013 #56
I would argue that the Congressional building is the most blackspade Aug 2013 #108
Snowden's dad comes across as marions ghost Aug 2013 #18
Not really--found his Fox interviews to be on the verge of loony. nt msanthrope Aug 2013 #24
Check out this one --Lon with Steph-- marions ghost Aug 2013 #50
Do you believe Alex Jones and Rand paul "come across as intelligent"? tridim Aug 2013 #25
Sorry but-- marions ghost Aug 2013 #55
How many total minutes have you heard Eddie and Father speak? tridim Aug 2013 #111
Other input and research goes into it marions ghost Aug 2013 #116
The nut didn't fall far from the tree, did it? ucrdem Aug 2013 #35
Excellent! Thank you. Bookmarking. The interview explains very simply snappyturtle Aug 2013 #6
Apparently and sad to see- kpete Aug 2013 #11
Scheiffer is the living example of bias. I had to quit watching him snappyturtle Aug 2013 #34
Don't forget Cheney and Ari Fleischer and Peter King! sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #39
Well, he could have disclosed under the Intelligence Community Whistleblowers Protection Act of 1998 msanthrope Aug 2013 #14
Which would have just kept it under wraps. NuclearDem Aug 2013 #16
Some secrets should be secret. Reasonable people can disagree about what those secrets are, but msanthrope Aug 2013 #22
"a dropout who is a coward"... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #121
No real protections there marions ghost Aug 2013 #20
No...we all don't know that. nt msanthrope Aug 2013 #21
Of course, history clearly shows how our government feels about whistleblowers. n/t 1awake Aug 2013 #32
Like Drake did? How did that work for him?? Drake 'disclosed under the ICWP Act of 1998 sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #41
That's a chance he should've taken. eom millennialmax Aug 2013 #26
like this guy? kpete Aug 2013 #27
There's no violin tiny enough. eom millennialmax Aug 2013 #30
How about Drake and Binney? They did everything according to the book and were destroyed sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #43
Yep marions ghost Aug 2013 #57
This message was self-deleted by its author HangOnKids Aug 2013 #115
***FAIL*** - Same excuse many browns\blacks can give for US justice system uponit7771 Aug 2013 #29
+1 bravenak Aug 2013 #36
Fear-based speculation. He didn't TRY to be a whistleblower. CakeGrrl Aug 2013 #45
A product of a proud American educational system. n/t Igel Aug 2013 #58
...an that is exactly the whole of it Sheepshank Aug 2013 #120
The propaganda is creepy beyond words. woo me with science Aug 2013 #46
+1 leftstreet Aug 2013 #52
Thank you. n/t totodeinhere Aug 2013 #62
And this is why we need to encourage aggressive use of the ignore function. backscatter712 Aug 2013 #72
You're right the claim about being "buried" is "creepy beyond words." ProSense Aug 2013 #95
Yes and it is really creepy to see isn't it? nt Mojorabbit Aug 2013 #122
I like how some proudly say they didn't read it and then call them names. neverforget Aug 2013 #124
Yep. People with way too much time/concern on their hands wtmusic Aug 2013 #134
Plus one! Enthusiast Aug 2013 #135
Yeah, they would dig up the capital to bury him. liberal N proud Aug 2013 #47
What 'communist countries?' leftstreet Aug 2013 #53
I suppose you are going to tell me China is not Communist! liberal N proud Aug 2013 #59
LOL yes the Chinese worker is the vanguard of society leftstreet Aug 2013 #63
It's Communist in name only. Actually it has the second largest capitalist totodeinhere Aug 2013 #65
Do they oppress their citizens? liberal N proud Aug 2013 #66
That means they are authoritarian or totalitarian. blackspade Aug 2013 #112
All that is true but you called then Communist, not oppressors. totodeinhere Aug 2013 #118
China still has a very active Communist party. liberal N proud Aug 2013 #125
I did not deny that they have a Communist party. What I am saying is that they totodeinhere Aug 2013 #126
LOL liberal N proud Aug 2013 #129
Communism: liberal N proud Aug 2013 #137
Communism in a form of capitalism blackspade Aug 2013 #110
Russia's not Communist--at least not anymore. Arkana Aug 2013 #71
This is fucking hilarious liberal N proud Aug 2013 #113
Seems,,, Cryptoad Aug 2013 #54
Love the three commas HangOnKids Aug 2013 #76
Talk about your fucking hyperbole. Arkana Aug 2013 #70
"Hyperbole" and irony ProSense Aug 2013 #79
And this sad affair BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #99
Nope.. and this is the kind of thing that makes me lose faith Peacetrain Aug 2013 #74
Really 'Dad'? SCVDem Aug 2013 #80
What a bunch of horseshit shawn703 Aug 2013 #85
He's right. The American people woule never have known LittleBlue Aug 2013 #87
+1000000 This is the truth and the relevant point. woo me with science Aug 2013 #123
Democrats Would Have Buried Snowden - My How Far We Have Sunk cantbeserious Aug 2013 #91
Hyperbolic lame excuse to avoid a trial. CakeGrrl Aug 2013 #92
I can see where the kid got his brains. Scurrilous Aug 2013 #101
ROFLMAO! SoapBox Aug 2013 #102
Squirrels kpete Aug 2013 #104
So Senator Sanders would have betrayed him, too? pnwmom Aug 2013 #105
Too few marions ghost Aug 2013 #117
It's amazing isn't it Andy823 Aug 2013 #132
Of course it's because pnwmom Aug 2013 #133
Snowden's Dad should be ashamed. He raised a buffoon. And a Russian Spy. MjolnirTime Aug 2013 #106
that would be a good trick to bury someone under the capital... madrchsod Aug 2013 #109
If Edward had performed on his job and had nit stolen files and revealed information Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #130
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Snowden's Dad: If Edward ...»Reply #25