Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Snowden's Dad: If Edward Would Have Stayed In the USA: "He would have been buried under the capital" [View all]ljm2002
(10,751 posts)86. You are still evading the issue...
...and failing to support your assertion: "Greenwald did him a disservice by encouraging him to non-selectively report info".
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
137 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Snowden's Dad: If Edward Would Have Stayed In the USA: "He would have been buried under the capital" [View all]
kpete
Aug 2013
OP
Edward Snowden is a modern day Paul Revere with a thumb drive full of news that Tyranny is coming!
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Aug 2013
#60
He wouldn't have been protected because he didn't bother to become a whistleblower.
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#2
2005 is irrelevant, ant the Tamm case is irrelevant because the programs themselves had not
JDPriestly
Aug 2013
#61
And here is why I object to the surveillance programs no matter who runs them
JDPriestly
Aug 2013
#119
It does protect contractors. What it does not protect is release to the public--Snowden would have
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#13
Even if it is procured illegally by th egovernment? Even if it runs afoul of the 4th Amendment?
RC
Aug 2013
#103
Yes, he should have done what Drake and Binney did. Drake followed the rules to the last letter and
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#37
Doesn't Greenwald also have a financial interest in the movie that filmmaker is crafting? nt
MADem
Aug 2013
#31
Well, he could have disclosed under the Intelligence Community Whistleblowers Protection Act of 1998
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#14
Some secrets should be secret. Reasonable people can disagree about what those secrets are, but
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#22
Of course, history clearly shows how our government feels about whistleblowers. n/t
1awake
Aug 2013
#32
Like Drake did? How did that work for him?? Drake 'disclosed under the ICWP Act of 1998
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#41
How about Drake and Binney? They did everything according to the book and were destroyed
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#43
And this is why we need to encourage aggressive use of the ignore function.
backscatter712
Aug 2013
#72
It's Communist in name only. Actually it has the second largest capitalist
totodeinhere
Aug 2013
#65
I did not deny that they have a Communist party. What I am saying is that they
totodeinhere
Aug 2013
#126
If Edward had performed on his job and had nit stolen files and revealed information
Thinkingabout
Aug 2013
#130