Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Did you Know? [View all]Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)38. Existence itself is unsustainable given a sufficiently long time line.
I'm not sure what specificity you're looking for. The economic effects of producers, consumers, and the government all reducing spending? The resulting reduction in the money supply in circulation? The results of deficit spending over some time period? What would happen to the global economy if the U.S. actually eliminated the national debt?
Reducing deficit spending is certainly a desirable goal, but the time to do it is during good times. Doing it now creates another drag on the overall economy resulting in just what we're seeing, a fictional, trickle down recovery.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nonsense. The deficit he inherited was 1.2 TRILLION per year. It was unsustainable...
Demo_Chris
Aug 2013
#4
Existence itself is unsustainable given a sufficiently long time line.
Egalitarian Thug
Aug 2013
#38
My neighbor is the electorate and he thinks we should move all the poor people onto some
Egalitarian Thug
Aug 2013
#40
First, ignorance is or it is not, you keep using the word, belief. Belief is irrelevant, either
Egalitarian Thug
Aug 2013
#44
Graph Clinton deficit Bush deficit Obama deficit (sorry for large size, thankfully DU downsizes it)
Bernardo de La Paz
Aug 2013
#9
I don't know how he did it while still managing to put up $750+ billion for TARP
hughee99
Aug 2013
#12
I believe he voted for it in the Senate and spoke in favor of it on the Senate floor,
hughee99
Aug 2013
#57
I'll take this as a no, Obama did NOT "bail" out the banks himself. Not even his idea, he voted for
uponit7771
Aug 2013
#58
I disagree, it was Bush admins idea...they pushed it...Bush singed it and Obama was part of a vote
uponit7771
Aug 2013
#60
I agree. I didn't argue at all that Obama hadn't done anything with the money...
hughee99
Aug 2013
#61
That might be part of the reason the GOP claims he is the worst President ever
liberal N proud
Aug 2013
#52