Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(13,005 posts)
1. The problem of spent fuel storage pools at nuclear power plants
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 01:34 AM
Aug 2013

In the other thread that was locked for not being late-breaking news, there was a discussion beginning of nuclear power plant spent storage pools. Here's an article I remember reading about it a long time ago -- a much over-looked problem / mode of failure.

NUCLEAR WARRIORS, Time Magazine, June 24, 2001

(about nuclear industry whistle-blowers trying to do something about the dangerous situation of spent nuclear fuel pools at nuclear power plant sites)

The pools weren't designed for this purpose, and risk is involved: the rods must be submerged at all times. A cooling system must dissipate the intense heat they give off. If the system failed, the pool could boil, turning the plant into a lethal sauna filled with clouds of radioactive steam. And if earthquake, human error or mechanical failure drained the pool, the result could be catastrophic: a meltdown of multiple cores taking place outside the reactor containment, releasing massive amounts of radiation and rendering hundreds of square miles uninhabitable.

... Finally, he took the case to the NRC himself, only to discover that officials there had known about the procedure for a decade without moving to stop it. The NRC says the practice is common, and safe--if a plant's cooling system is designed to handle the heat load. But Millstone's wasn't. And when Galatis learned that plants in Delaware, Nebraska and New Jersey had similar fuel-pool troubles, he realized the NRC was sitting on a nationwide problem.

... In fact, Millstone is merely the latest in a long string of cases in which the NRC bungled its mandate and overlooked serious safety problems until whistle blowers came forward (see box).

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,135575,00.html#ixzz2buxU9EGE

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The problem of spent fuel storage pools at nuclear power plants progree Aug 2013 #1
K&R! Great article, a must-read, IMO. Rhiannon12866 Aug 2013 #2
Damned if they do, damned if they don't HoneychildMooseMoss Aug 2013 #3
No, reactor three has the UO2/MOX fuel. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #4
You're right, it wasn't MOX HoneychildMooseMoss Aug 2013 #5
Still not unicorns and rainbows if it catches on fire though.. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #6
It's one reason why thorium molten salt reactors were abandoned Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #14
All spent fuel rods have plutonium in them - during fission, some of the uranium captures neutrons progree Aug 2013 #8
Thanks to both of you for your explanations. HoneychildMooseMoss Aug 2013 #10
Assuming that TEPCO...... DeSwiss Aug 2013 #7
Yup, that's why they are worried - better to TRY to get this done now rather than later progree Aug 2013 #9
Great links! Thanks! nt Mojorabbit Aug 2013 #13
K&R! hrmjustin Aug 2013 #11
K&R. silvershadow Aug 2013 #12
Funny, it's on Reuter's front page RIGHT NOW, but it's NOT "late breaking news" per DU? go figger. nilram Aug 2013 #15
It's not breaking news because... FBaggins Aug 2013 #39
It's not just Arnie Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #48
Those are entirely different things FBaggins Aug 2013 #49
Scary shit davidpdx Aug 2013 #16
There are earthquakes in Japan every day Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #17
That's a little too close for comfort for me davidpdx Aug 2013 #24
Interestingly enough, Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #29
I heard a lot of foreigners did leave or move to other places in Japan davidpdx Aug 2013 #43
There was (still is?) an official advisory to US citizens to not stay for more than a year Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #45
The Korean Navy just got a new submarine davidpdx Aug 2013 #47
This picture was taken a few days after the 3-11 earthquake Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #32
Earthquakes In Japan? We GOT your earthquakes in Japan right here... PearliePoo2 Aug 2013 #26
The seismic activity for March-May 2011 is really amazing Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #28
Tell me how building these things were a good idea to begin with madokie Aug 2013 #18
In Japan, at least, Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #19
Good, that's the correct course of action. Sirveri Aug 2013 #20
Yes it is. But it will be dangerous as hell.... Junkdrawer Aug 2013 #21
Why? FBaggins Aug 2013 #41
"Arnie's nonsense"??? Really? Junkdrawer Aug 2013 #51
Yes... really. FBaggins Aug 2013 #52
So then the question is, Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #22
The safe place is clearly not where it currently is. Sirveri Aug 2013 #37
Of course, transporting such hazardous materials by truck would not be so safe, Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #44
I've got a really bad feeling about this... PearliePoo2 Aug 2013 #23
The Tokyo Metro Area has 30 million population Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #30
30 plus million??? Good grief! PearliePoo2 Aug 2013 #33
It is pretty darn dense Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #36
not as scary as leaving them there. hobbit709 Aug 2013 #25
Hey, the Fukiexperts say will say...wait. Where are our experts? Safetykitten Aug 2013 #27
Ask your doctor if plutonium is right for you. Octafish Aug 2013 #31
You know what the 1% say to the possibility of 30 million deaths? WinkyDink Aug 2013 #34
Reactor #4 RobertEarl Aug 2013 #35
Hardly a thing right in there. FBaggins Aug 2013 #40
Haha RobertEarl Aug 2013 #46
Hilarious FBaggins Aug 2013 #50
Heh RobertEarl Aug 2013 #53
Even more hilarious... keep 'em coming. FBaggins Aug 2013 #54
So, you got nothing? RobertEarl Aug 2013 #55
Oh... my apologies. FBaggins Aug 2013 #56
Wow RobertEarl Aug 2013 #59
Five reactors under construction within spittin' distance of your front door FBaggins Aug 2013 #60
the structure is likely tilted and is bulging after its last explosion magical thyme Aug 2013 #57
Not really. FBaggins Aug 2013 #58
No, I'm not saying. Reuters is saying, based on the people they interviewed magical thyme Aug 2013 #62
Post removed Post removed Aug 2013 #61
k and r for solar and wind DonRedwood Aug 2013 #38
Incalculable rational; rational to move spent fuel to stable off site location for best case. PufPuf23 Aug 2013 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fukushima - they are plan...»Reply #1