Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Robert Reich: Why the Anger? [View all]
Why the Anger?
Monday, August 12, 2013
Why is the nation more bitterly divided today than its been in eighty years? Why is there more anger, vituperation, and political polarization now than even during Joe McCarthys anti-communist witch hunts of the 1950s, the tempestuous struggle for civil rights in the 1960s, the divisive Vietnam war, or the Watergate scandal?
If anything, youd think this would be an era of relative calm. The Soviet Union has disappeared and the Cold War is over. The Civil Rights struggle continues, but at least we now have a black middle class and even a black President. While the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have been controversial, the all-volunteer army means young Americans arent being dragged off to war against their will. And although politicians continue to generate scandals, the transgressions dont threaten the integrity of our government as did Watergate.
And yet, by almost every measure, Americans are angrier today. Theyre more contemptuous of almost every major institution government, business, the media. Theyre more convinced the nation is on the wrong track. And they are far more polarized.
Political scientists say the gap between the median Republican voter and the median Democrat is wider today on a whole host of issues than its been since the 1920s. .....................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://robertreich.org/post/58082787864
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When there's an outside enemy, members of a group unite. When there's not, they turn on each other.
SharonAnn
Aug 2013
#33
Ah...my post is actually a great example of what he's talking about...I agree.
onpatrol98
Aug 2013
#14
Reich is right in this article - its the wealth gap. And onpatrol is right - Reich has culpability
riderinthestorm
Aug 2013
#42
OK, let's cut the crap. He knows all the rage is because a black President is in office & RW stoking
kelliekat44
Aug 2013
#10
WHOOP, THERE IT IS!!!!!!!!! (For those who can't handle simple TRUTH!!)
Liberal_Stalwart71
Aug 2013
#17
It may surprise you, but I was in a rage the last time a White guy was the President too.
1-Old-Man
Aug 2013
#32
The answer is simple: There's a black Muslim socialist Kenyan in the White House.
Liberal_Stalwart71
Aug 2013
#16
I disagree. People were angry at Clinton for Monica but apparently not angry enough
Liberal_Stalwart71
Aug 2013
#31
The House impeached him. The Senate acquitted him. The American people loved Bill Clinton who left
Liberal_Stalwart71
Aug 2013
#43
Not for me, but again, like Obama said and Clinton before him agreed...
Liberal_Stalwart71
Aug 2013
#38
People are beginning to recognize that this is not the ordinary differences - it is a matter of
jwirr
Aug 2013
#18
Most of these articles are written as a warning to the 1% that they better start trickling down.
Spitfire of ATJ
Aug 2013
#30