Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PearliePoo2

(7,768 posts)
23. I've got a really bad feeling about this...
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 09:40 AM
Aug 2013
More from the article:
Spent fuel rods also contain plutonium, one of the most toxic substances in the universe, that gets formed during the later stages of a reactor core's operation.

"There is a risk of an inadvertent criticality if the bundles are distorted and get too close to each other," Gundersen said.
He was referring to an atomic chain reaction that left unchecked could result in a large release of radiation and heat that the fuel pool cooling system isn't designed to absorb.
"The problem with a fuel pool criticality is that you can't stop it. There are no control rods to control it," Gundersen said. "The spent fuel pool cooling system is designed only to remove decay heat, not heat from an ongoing nuclear reaction."
The rods are also vulnerable to fire should they be exposed to air, Gundersen said.

The fuel assemblies have to be first pulled from the racks they are stored in, then inserted into a heavy steel chamber. This operation takes place under water before the chamber, which shields the radiation pulsating from the rods, can be removed from the pool and lowered to ground level.
The chamber is then transported to the plant's common storage pool in an undamaged building where the assemblies will be stored.

Tepco confirmed the Reactor No. 4 fuel pool contains debris during an investigation into the chamber earlier this month.

Removing the rods from the pool is a delicate task normally assisted by computers, according to Toshio Kimura, a former Tepco technician, who worked at Fukushima Daiichi for 11 years.

"Previously it was a computer-controlled process that memorized the exact locations of the rods down to the millimeter and now they don't have that. It has to be done manually so there is a high risk that they will drop and break one of the fuel rods," Kimura said.

And if an another strong earthquake strikes before the fuel is fully removed that topples the building or punctures the pool and allow the water to drain, a spent fuel fire releasing more radiation than during the initial disaster is possible, threatening Tokyo 125 miles away.

Tokyo?? Tokyo has a population of over 13 million!

fuck...



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The problem of spent fuel storage pools at nuclear power plants progree Aug 2013 #1
K&R! Great article, a must-read, IMO. Rhiannon12866 Aug 2013 #2
Damned if they do, damned if they don't HoneychildMooseMoss Aug 2013 #3
No, reactor three has the UO2/MOX fuel. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #4
You're right, it wasn't MOX HoneychildMooseMoss Aug 2013 #5
Still not unicorns and rainbows if it catches on fire though.. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #6
It's one reason why thorium molten salt reactors were abandoned Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #14
All spent fuel rods have plutonium in them - during fission, some of the uranium captures neutrons progree Aug 2013 #8
Thanks to both of you for your explanations. HoneychildMooseMoss Aug 2013 #10
Assuming that TEPCO...... DeSwiss Aug 2013 #7
Yup, that's why they are worried - better to TRY to get this done now rather than later progree Aug 2013 #9
Great links! Thanks! nt Mojorabbit Aug 2013 #13
K&R! hrmjustin Aug 2013 #11
K&R. silvershadow Aug 2013 #12
Funny, it's on Reuter's front page RIGHT NOW, but it's NOT "late breaking news" per DU? go figger. nilram Aug 2013 #15
It's not breaking news because... FBaggins Aug 2013 #39
It's not just Arnie Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #48
Those are entirely different things FBaggins Aug 2013 #49
Scary shit davidpdx Aug 2013 #16
There are earthquakes in Japan every day Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #17
That's a little too close for comfort for me davidpdx Aug 2013 #24
Interestingly enough, Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #29
I heard a lot of foreigners did leave or move to other places in Japan davidpdx Aug 2013 #43
There was (still is?) an official advisory to US citizens to not stay for more than a year Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #45
The Korean Navy just got a new submarine davidpdx Aug 2013 #47
This picture was taken a few days after the 3-11 earthquake Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #32
Earthquakes In Japan? We GOT your earthquakes in Japan right here... PearliePoo2 Aug 2013 #26
The seismic activity for March-May 2011 is really amazing Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #28
Tell me how building these things were a good idea to begin with madokie Aug 2013 #18
In Japan, at least, Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #19
Good, that's the correct course of action. Sirveri Aug 2013 #20
Yes it is. But it will be dangerous as hell.... Junkdrawer Aug 2013 #21
Why? FBaggins Aug 2013 #41
"Arnie's nonsense"??? Really? Junkdrawer Aug 2013 #51
Yes... really. FBaggins Aug 2013 #52
So then the question is, Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #22
The safe place is clearly not where it currently is. Sirveri Aug 2013 #37
Of course, transporting such hazardous materials by truck would not be so safe, Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #44
I've got a really bad feeling about this... PearliePoo2 Aug 2013 #23
The Tokyo Metro Area has 30 million population Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #30
30 plus million??? Good grief! PearliePoo2 Aug 2013 #33
It is pretty darn dense Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #36
not as scary as leaving them there. hobbit709 Aug 2013 #25
Hey, the Fukiexperts say will say...wait. Where are our experts? Safetykitten Aug 2013 #27
Ask your doctor if plutonium is right for you. Octafish Aug 2013 #31
You know what the 1% say to the possibility of 30 million deaths? WinkyDink Aug 2013 #34
Reactor #4 RobertEarl Aug 2013 #35
Hardly a thing right in there. FBaggins Aug 2013 #40
Haha RobertEarl Aug 2013 #46
Hilarious FBaggins Aug 2013 #50
Heh RobertEarl Aug 2013 #53
Even more hilarious... keep 'em coming. FBaggins Aug 2013 #54
So, you got nothing? RobertEarl Aug 2013 #55
Oh... my apologies. FBaggins Aug 2013 #56
Wow RobertEarl Aug 2013 #59
Five reactors under construction within spittin' distance of your front door FBaggins Aug 2013 #60
the structure is likely tilted and is bulging after its last explosion magical thyme Aug 2013 #57
Not really. FBaggins Aug 2013 #58
No, I'm not saying. Reuters is saying, based on the people they interviewed magical thyme Aug 2013 #62
Post removed Post removed Aug 2013 #61
k and r for solar and wind DonRedwood Aug 2013 #38
Incalculable rational; rational to move spent fuel to stable off site location for best case. PufPuf23 Aug 2013 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fukushima - they are plan...»Reply #23