Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 11:52 AM Aug 2013

Intelligence committee urged to explain if they withheld crucial NSA document [View all]

Related thread from 2 days ago:
"Intelligence committee withheld key file before critical NSA vote, Amash and Holt claim"


Intelligence committee urged to explain if they withheld crucial NSA document
Critics demands answers from chairman Mike Rogers after claims that committee failed to share document before key vote

Spencer Ackerman in Washington
theguardian.com, Wednesday 14 August 2013 15.30 BST


Mike Rogers, a former FBI agent, chairs the House intelligence committee. Critics have accused the committee of being too close to the NSA. Photograph: AP

The leadership of the House intelligence committee is under growing pressure to explain whether it withheld surveillance information from members of Congress before a key vote to renew the Patriot Act.

...

Now Morgan Griffith, a Republican who represents Virginia's ninth district, is calling for answers. "I certainly think leadership needs to figure out what's going on. We're trying to get information so we can do our jobs as congressmen," he told the Guardian. "If we're not able to get that information, it's inappropriate."

...

Amash told the Guardian on Monday that he had confirmed with the House intelligence committee that the committee did not make non-committee members aware of the classified overview from 2011 of the bulk phone records collection program first revealed by the Guardian thanks to whistleblower Edward Snowden. The document was expressly designed to be shared with legislators who did not serve on the panel; it appears that a corresponding document for the Senate in 2011 was made available to all senators.

...

"If the HPSCI leadership withheld a document, intended by the administration for release to non-committee members – a document that could have led to a different outcome when the Patriot Act was reauthorized in 2011 – this is tantamount to subversion of the democratic process," said Bea Edwards, the executive director of the Government Accountability Project.

...

"There is clearly a loss of confidence in HPSCI leadership among some House members, notably including members of the majority party," added Steve Aftergood, an intelligence and secrecy expert with the Federation of American Scientists.


...

The panel's chairman, Mike Rogers, is a former FBI agent. Its ranking Democrat, Dutch Ruppersberger of Maryland, received over $220,000 in campaign contributions during his past term from the defense and intelligence industries, according to David Kravets of Wired. Both are staunch advocates of the NSA bulk surveillance programs.

...

"The constitution doesn't just say 12 members or 24 or whatever it is [on the House intelligence committee]: it says all of us have to protect the constitution," Griffith said. "It's one of our prime duties."


...

Much more to read here: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/14/nsa-intelligence-committee-under-pressure-document

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yo "The Guardian", if you are going to masquerade as a real news outlet snooper2 Aug 2013 #1
I think The Guardian has a pretty good handle on how to be a real news outlet hootinholler Aug 2013 #3
There should be no bias in journalism, Period snooper2 Aug 2013 #4
First, What bullshit! hootinholler Aug 2013 #5
I agree, except I would change that to every paper has an editorial bias... deurbano Aug 2013 #10
says who? nt David Krout Aug 2013 #30
+100 nt 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #13
We "get it" that you dislike Snowden & The Guardian, but.. bvar22 Aug 2013 #7
I thought members of the Intelligence committees had clearance other members didn't have snooper2 Aug 2013 #8
Really? Defending Republican Chairman Rogers? bvar22 Aug 2013 #15
OFFS! hootinholler Aug 2013 #19
Cool, guess he fucked up LOL snooper2 Aug 2013 #20
nice ad! too funny Pretzel_Warrior Aug 2013 #32
When presented with evidence of a complete breakdown in the Congressional oversight process Maedhros Aug 2013 #16
Hyperbole gets ratings! snooper2 Aug 2013 #17
Why are you so focused on ridiculing those of us who are concerned about our Constitutional rights? Maedhros Aug 2013 #24
117k Targets, it's the truthy far left far right government is spying on me! snooper2 Aug 2013 #25
Ah, yes. Concern for civil rights is "far Left." Maedhros Aug 2013 #29
Nobody knew about the robosigning. reusrename Aug 2013 #33
Cut the bullshit. Did the intel comm. withhold surveillance info before the Patriot Act vote?? chimpymustgo Aug 2013 #31
Attack the messenger. Attack the messenger. nt Mojorabbit Aug 2013 #34
Are they appointed by Nancy? kentuck Aug 2013 #2
Based on this 2007 announcement, it looks like Pelosi chooses the Dems for the House Select Catherina Aug 2013 #9
"... tantamount to subversion of the democratic process ..." Scuba Aug 2013 #6
+1 uponit7771 Aug 2013 #12
This what is most dangerous about the surveillance bureaucracy. JDPriestly Aug 2013 #11
A most important point. Thank you n/t Catherina Aug 2013 #23
"Now Morgan Griffith, a Republican ... is calling for answers." What about some Democrats? AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2013 #14
The Democrats are searching for "Bi-Partisan Consensus", bvar22 Aug 2013 #18
Why not try blaming the Republican Chair of the Committee who made the decision pnwmom Aug 2013 #21
There's Holt, Wyden, Udall, Conyers.... Forget Pelosi for this one Catherina Aug 2013 #22
Republicon occultism. As usual. Berlum Aug 2013 #26
Sounds like a Republican problem to me, as they chair the committee. nt msanthrope Aug 2013 #27
All intelligence committee heads are suspect. dkf Aug 2013 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Intelligence committee ur...