Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
31. I disagree. People were angry at Clinton for Monica but apparently not angry enough
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 01:13 PM
Aug 2013

to throw him out of office. In fact, the more the Republicans tried to throw him out, the higher his job approval numbers increased.

For me, it was baffling why more Americans weren't angry with Bush II, his Republican criminal cabal (and the cooperating Democrats) for what they did to this country. Instead, their outrage has been reserved for this president--again, not directed at the Republicans who continue to get away with everything.

Just look here on DU and all the anti-Obama threads and rhetoric. For every Republican hate thread, there are at least a dozen anti-Obama threads. It's ridiculous. No one has held the Republicans accountable for anything they've done and continue to do to sabotage this nation's economy and regress this country to where it was since the Great Depression. Actually, the Republicans would love it if we regressed to pre-Civil War times!

Let me tell this story:

Last night I went to dinner with a group of friends. All of us work for the federal government. One of my friends works for the NSA. I work at HUD. A few others work for DOT, EPA, USDA. All of us have been able to get furlough days reduced or completely rescinded, and we think it is because Obama has been negotiating behind the scenes and directly with agency heads, OMB, and the federal unions, to stop cuts in S&E; instead, targeting any wasteful spending or getting rid of discretionary programs that are no longer effective. As a result, we have no additional furlough days, and many other agencies are in the same boat (for now, that is).

And still, the guy who works for NSA--who concidently had NO furlough days at all and therefore had no cause to complain--blamed Obama for sequestration. The rest of us sat there at the dinner table looking dumbfounded and having to explain to him what happened and how the Republicans held budget negotiations hostage until we had no choice but to have sequestion.

Anyway, it's been like this now for damn near 5 years.

Case in point: Our agency and most agencies just completed and submitted our FY15 budget requests to OMB. So now, OMB (headed by the president) is reviewing that budget. Now mind you, we have submitted an FY12, FY13, FY14 and now FY15 budget request. The president, in return, has submitted an FY12, FY13, FY14 and will submit an FY15 budget request to Congress. What have we gotten in return? We did get a reduced budget for FY12 after nearly shutting down the government, but most of the negotiations thereafter have resulted in Continuing Resolutions up to this point. FY13, the latest budget, resulted in a Continuing Resolution, and of course FY14, which Congress will fight over when they get back, will likely result in yet another Continuing Resolution. (Not to mention, there's another debt ceiling fight before the FY14 budget fight begins, which means we could face another government shutdown along with another possible sequestration.) This has NEVER happened before---NEVER!! Not until the black Muslim from Kenya dared showed his face in the White House!!

But rest assured, the first thing the Republicans will do when they get back is not work on a jobs bill or pass the $5 billion infrastructure jobs bill that is ready for Obama's signature and being held up by the Republicans in the House. Hell, no! That would mean more jobs and a better economy and we can't have the black Muslim from Kenya receiving ANY credit for that. As Boehner would say, HELL NO WE CAN'T!!!

No, what the Republicans will do instead is run to the cameras and the corporate media and complain that the president has not submitted any budget request; that the president has no plan for jobs, and has not put together anything. And sure enough, watch as many Democrats--even the ones here on DU--fall in line, sucumbing to the Republican (and Corporate Media) false meme that the president has no plan.

Damnit I just explained that we submitted all these budget requests and that those requests were reviewed and submitted to Congress from the president!! And yet, there are STILL people here on DU who listen to the Republican Party, a recalcitrant corporate media, and some liberal commentators that Obama hasn't done anything!!

UGH!! It's so frustrating!! We're working our asses off here. We do all this work to put this shit together and get nothing in return but ridicule from Americans about how horrible government is and how lazy and awful government workers are.

And now you know why I believe in my heart that this is about race. It *IS* about race. Plain and simple.

No other president in the history of this great Republic has EVER been asked to submit his birth certificate and PROVE that he is a legitimate American president, duly elected by the American people. TWICE!!

No other president in the history of this great Republic has EVER been held hostage in terms of deliberately not raising the debt ceiling as punishment for having alternative ideas!!

No other president in the history of this great Republic has EVER been forced to work with an opposition party where NOT ONE member wanted to work with him or compromise in some way. Even Bill Clinton, as much as the Republicans despised him, was able to get SOME Republicans onboard and get things done. Bill was never faced with debt ceiling challenges or constant Continuing Resolutions instead of the required Appropriations Bills. George Bush II never vetoed any spending bill, always raised the debt ceiling, and was always able to sign infrastructure project bills, Appropriations bills that are, by the way, required by the U.S. Constitution!!

With all that said, I really appreciate your response and the candor with which you express your thoughts.

However, I stand by my main point: No one can convince me that the maltreatment of this president is due to anything else besides the color of his skin.

I won't believe it. I never will. I see it with my own two eyes. I live and work in this city and it's right before my own two eyes. It's there and it's destroying this country.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Robert Reich: Why the Anger? [View all] marmar Aug 2013 OP
du rec. xchrom Aug 2013 #1
Fox News, Blimpy, Clear Channel etc. Vinnie From Indy Aug 2013 #2
Exactly. n2doc Aug 2013 #26
When there's an outside enemy, members of a group unite. When there's not, they turn on each other. SharonAnn Aug 2013 #33
+1 Dawson Leery Aug 2013 #40
Bob needs to get out more often, and not just to Starbucks. Safetykitten Aug 2013 #3
Bingo! +1 for you & K&R for the thread. Egalitarian Thug Aug 2013 #4
Watergate? How about Shrub's years? Solly Mack Aug 2013 #5
Corporate hate media, advocating for more money and power for the 1% tabasco Aug 2013 #6
Robert "NAFTA" Reich onpatrol98 Aug 2013 #7
When you can't address the subject attack the messenger Bandit Aug 2013 #9
Ah...my post is actually a great example of what he's talking about...I agree. onpatrol98 Aug 2013 #14
And you respond by again attacking him. zeemike Aug 2013 #23
This is silly... onpatrol98 Aug 2013 #37
I did not come here to ignore people zeemike Aug 2013 #39
Reich is right in this article - its the wealth gap. And onpatrol is right - Reich has culpability riderinthestorm Aug 2013 #42
Yep! Vinnie From Indy Aug 2013 #44
Reich is someone who can alternate between articulate and obtuse markiv Aug 2013 #8
OK, let's cut the crap. He knows all the rage is because a black President is in office & RW stoking kelliekat44 Aug 2013 #10
WHOOP, THERE IT IS!!!!!!!!! (For those who can't handle simple TRUTH!!) Liberal_Stalwart71 Aug 2013 #17
It may surprise you, but I was in a rage the last time a White guy was the President too. 1-Old-Man Aug 2013 #32
Read the article and I think you'll see he nails the exact reason. Marr Aug 2013 #11
Angry and completely ineffective. ananda Aug 2013 #12
Cant wait for FOX to call him out as a Commie-pinko-anti-American-liberal. kelliekat44 Aug 2013 #13
Mass stupidity. Zoeisright Aug 2013 #15
The answer is simple: There's a black Muslim socialist Kenyan in the White House. Liberal_Stalwart71 Aug 2013 #16
The anger started long before Obama came on the stage. zeemike Aug 2013 #24
I disagree. People were angry at Clinton for Monica but apparently not angry enough Liberal_Stalwart71 Aug 2013 #31
Well they impeached him. zeemike Aug 2013 #41
The House impeached him. The Senate acquitted him. The American people loved Bill Clinton who left Liberal_Stalwart71 Aug 2013 #43
That answer is simplistic, not simple. winter is coming Aug 2013 #35
Not for me, but again, like Obama said and Clinton before him agreed... Liberal_Stalwart71 Aug 2013 #38
People are beginning to recognize that this is not the ordinary differences - it is a matter of jwirr Aug 2013 #18
And we knew this nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #19
Agreed. Brigid Aug 2013 #27
Plutocracy. People are feeling less empowered. Auggie Aug 2013 #20
more from article: abelenkpe Aug 2013 #21
Because The Sheriff Is A................................ Caeser67 Aug 2013 #22
The last time America was this divided . . . Brigid Aug 2013 #25
Americans are angrier today because 90-percent Aug 2013 #28
This statement is flat out wrong. RC Aug 2013 #29
Most of these articles are written as a warning to the 1% that they better start trickling down. Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2013 #30
Because we spent all we gained from plundering a continent and arming the winners of WW I & II? FarCenter Aug 2013 #34
both the parties' decisionmakers are on the right, MisterP Aug 2013 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Robert Reich: Why the Ang...»Reply #31