Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
9. Based on this 2007 announcement, it looks like Pelosi chooses the Dems for the House Select
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 01:17 PM
Aug 2013

and Boehner chooses his. The leadership of the House gets to choose who serves on the House Intelligence Committee (and gets to remove them too).

Pelosi Announces Members of the Intelligence Committee
January 17, 2007

Washington, D.C. - Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced this evening that she has selected the Democratic members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. 'These distinguished Members will give to our nation's intelligence programs and activities the aggressive oversight necessary to ensure that they are operating effectively and within the law,' Pelosi said. 'I am confident that the intelligence community will benefit from this type of oversight and that the American people will be made safer by it.'

The Democratic members of the Intelligence Committee for the 110th Congress are:

Congressman Silvestre Reyes of Texas, Chairman

Congressman Alcee Hastings of Florida

Congressman Leonard Boswell of Iowa

Congressman Bud Cramer of Alabama

Congresswoman Anna Eshoo of California

Congressman Rush Holt of New Jersey

Congressman C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger

Congressman John Tierney of Massachusetts

Congressman Mike Thompson of California

Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky of Illinois

Congressman Jim Langevin of Rhode Island

Congressman Patrick Murphy of Pennsylvania

http://www.democraticleader.gov/news/press/pelosi-announces-members-intelligence-committee


(I just used that as an example, here's the 2011 announcement but it doesn't specify that she selects them).

The Senate selections seem to work differently.

Membership and Leadership

The membership of the committees has been limited in time, staggered, and connected to the standing committee system and political party system in Congress. These features, moreover, differ between the two panels. Each select committee, for instance, reserves seats for members from the chamber’s committees on Appropriations, Armed Services, Foreign Affairs/Foreign Relations, and Judiciary. The specifics differ, however: the Senate requires two persons, a majority and minority Member, from each of these standing committees, while the House calls for only one Member from each standing committee with overlapping jurisdiction.

...

http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/RL32525_20120314.pdf

I never thought of it until you asked. Now I'm too pissed off to keep looking because this typical corruption came up in a search

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Verizon lobbyists host fundraisers for Intelligence Committee members
By Jake Harper Jun 06 2013 5:07 p.m.

Lobbyists for Verizon Communications, which is refusing comment on a now-confirmed report that the telecommunications giant turned millions of its customers' records over to the National Security Agency, have thrown fundraisers for members of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees, records compiled by the Sunlight Foundation show.

According to the Political Party Time database, which tracks candidate fundraising events, lobbyists for Verizon Communications have hosted at least five fundraising events for Sens. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., and Susan Collins, R-Maine. Louis Dupart, of the lobbying firm The Normandy Group, hosted at least three events, two for Mikulski and one for Collins, while Wayne Berman hosted two more for Collins, including a birthday reception in 2010. Both senators voted in 2008 in favor of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which shielded telecom companies, including Verizon, from lawsuits related to an earlier wiretapping controversy.

Lobbyists for Verizon have also hosted a fundraiser for Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., an ex officio member of the Senate committee, and Rep. Thomas Rooney, R-Fla., a member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

(details)

...

http://reporting.sunlightfoundation.com/2013/verizon/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yo "The Guardian", if you are going to masquerade as a real news outlet snooper2 Aug 2013 #1
I think The Guardian has a pretty good handle on how to be a real news outlet hootinholler Aug 2013 #3
There should be no bias in journalism, Period snooper2 Aug 2013 #4
First, What bullshit! hootinholler Aug 2013 #5
I agree, except I would change that to every paper has an editorial bias... deurbano Aug 2013 #10
says who? nt David Krout Aug 2013 #30
+100 nt 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #13
We "get it" that you dislike Snowden & The Guardian, but.. bvar22 Aug 2013 #7
I thought members of the Intelligence committees had clearance other members didn't have snooper2 Aug 2013 #8
Really? Defending Republican Chairman Rogers? bvar22 Aug 2013 #15
OFFS! hootinholler Aug 2013 #19
Cool, guess he fucked up LOL snooper2 Aug 2013 #20
nice ad! too funny Pretzel_Warrior Aug 2013 #32
When presented with evidence of a complete breakdown in the Congressional oversight process Maedhros Aug 2013 #16
Hyperbole gets ratings! snooper2 Aug 2013 #17
Why are you so focused on ridiculing those of us who are concerned about our Constitutional rights? Maedhros Aug 2013 #24
117k Targets, it's the truthy far left far right government is spying on me! snooper2 Aug 2013 #25
Ah, yes. Concern for civil rights is "far Left." Maedhros Aug 2013 #29
Nobody knew about the robosigning. reusrename Aug 2013 #33
Cut the bullshit. Did the intel comm. withhold surveillance info before the Patriot Act vote?? chimpymustgo Aug 2013 #31
Attack the messenger. Attack the messenger. nt Mojorabbit Aug 2013 #34
Are they appointed by Nancy? kentuck Aug 2013 #2
Based on this 2007 announcement, it looks like Pelosi chooses the Dems for the House Select Catherina Aug 2013 #9
"... tantamount to subversion of the democratic process ..." Scuba Aug 2013 #6
+1 uponit7771 Aug 2013 #12
This what is most dangerous about the surveillance bureaucracy. JDPriestly Aug 2013 #11
A most important point. Thank you n/t Catherina Aug 2013 #23
"Now Morgan Griffith, a Republican ... is calling for answers." What about some Democrats? AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2013 #14
The Democrats are searching for "Bi-Partisan Consensus", bvar22 Aug 2013 #18
Why not try blaming the Republican Chair of the Committee who made the decision pnwmom Aug 2013 #21
There's Holt, Wyden, Udall, Conyers.... Forget Pelosi for this one Catherina Aug 2013 #22
Republicon occultism. As usual. Berlum Aug 2013 #26
Sounds like a Republican problem to me, as they chair the committee. nt msanthrope Aug 2013 #27
All intelligence committee heads are suspect. dkf Aug 2013 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Intelligence committee ur...»Reply #9