Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)

13. +100 nt

Reply to hootinholler (Reply #3)

Wed Aug 14, 2013, 01:52 PM

Aug 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Intelligence committee urged to explain if they withheld crucial NSA document [View all] Catherina Aug 2013 OP

Yo "The Guardian", if you are going to masquerade as a real news outlet snooper2 Aug 2013 #1

I think The Guardian has a pretty good handle on how to be a real news outlet hootinholler Aug 2013 #3

There should be no bias in journalism, Period snooper2 Aug 2013 #4

First, What bullshit! hootinholler Aug 2013 #5

I agree, except I would change that to every paper has an editorial bias... deurbano Aug 2013 #10

says who? nt David Krout Aug 2013 #30

+100 nt 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #13

We "get it" that you dislike Snowden & The Guardian, but.. bvar22 Aug 2013 #7

I thought members of the Intelligence committees had clearance other members didn't have snooper2 Aug 2013 #8

Really? Defending Republican Chairman Rogers? bvar22 Aug 2013 #15

OFFS! hootinholler Aug 2013 #19

Cool, guess he fucked up LOL snooper2 Aug 2013 #20

nice ad! too funny Pretzel_Warrior Aug 2013 #32

When presented with evidence of a complete breakdown in the Congressional oversight process Maedhros Aug 2013 #16

Hyperbole gets ratings! snooper2 Aug 2013 #17

Why are you so focused on ridiculing those of us who are concerned about our Constitutional rights? Maedhros Aug 2013 #24

117k Targets, it's the truthy far left far right government is spying on me! snooper2 Aug 2013 #25

Ah, yes. Concern for civil rights is "far Left." Maedhros Aug 2013 #29

Nobody knew about the robosigning. reusrename Aug 2013 #33

Cut the bullshit. Did the intel comm. withhold surveillance info before the Patriot Act vote?? chimpymustgo Aug 2013 #31

Attack the messenger. Attack the messenger. nt Mojorabbit Aug 2013 #34

Are they appointed by Nancy? kentuck Aug 2013 #2

Based on this 2007 announcement, it looks like Pelosi chooses the Dems for the House Select Catherina Aug 2013 #9

"... tantamount to subversion of the democratic process ..." Scuba Aug 2013 #6

+1 uponit7771 Aug 2013 #12

This what is most dangerous about the surveillance bureaucracy. JDPriestly Aug 2013 #11

A most important point. Thank you n/t Catherina Aug 2013 #23

"Now Morgan Griffith, a Republican ... is calling for answers." What about some Democrats? AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2013 #14

The Democrats are searching for "Bi-Partisan Consensus", bvar22 Aug 2013 #18

Why not try blaming the Republican Chair of the Committee who made the decision pnwmom Aug 2013 #21

There's Holt, Wyden, Udall, Conyers.... Forget Pelosi for this one Catherina Aug 2013 #22

Republicon occultism. As usual. Berlum Aug 2013 #26

Sounds like a Republican problem to me, as they chair the committee. nt msanthrope Aug 2013 #27

All intelligence committee heads are suspect. dkf Aug 2013 #28