Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(116,464 posts)

9. Well,

Fri Feb 24, 2012, 10:38 AM

Feb 2012

"Baby... bathwater...An aggregate tax cut is an aggregate tax cut."

...math...logic...28 percent > 0 or 20 percent.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What Everone Needs to Know About Obama's Costly Corporate Tax Cut, and How to Fix It: [View all] grahamhgreen Feb 2012 OP

Du rec. Nt xchrom Feb 2012 #1

The two choices izquierdista Feb 2012 #2

It really does feel that way to me. stillwaiting Feb 2012 #3

I'm sure ProSense Feb 2012 #4

Baby... bathwater... MannyGoldstein Feb 2012 #7

Well, ProSense Feb 2012 #9

"Make No Mistake: we need to cut corporate tax rates to MannyGoldstein Feb 2012 #5

You ProSense Feb 2012 #6

I'm voting for the candidate MannyGoldstein Feb 2012 #8

So ProSense Feb 2012 #10

Until we recognize and identify the collusion, woo me with science Feb 2012 #11

What will be left after the inevitable "compromise"? bvar22 Feb 2012 #13

talk like a Pastore, sting like a Blair! MisterP Feb 2012 #16

I thought the CBO numbers had it as revenue neutral? Motown_Johnny Feb 2012 #17

The final proposal will have to be vetted. This report indicates grahamhgreen Feb 2012 #18

You are right, but the politics is better with a revenue neutral plan Motown_Johnny Feb 2012 #19