Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Black Helicopter Left and Its Disconnect from the Constitution [View all]JHB
(38,191 posts)53. Same guy, 2011: "Joining the ideologue spheres' pure, fanatic, indomitable hysteria, Krugman... "
Last edited Thu Aug 15, 2013, 03:05 PM - Edit history (1)
Paul Krugman is a Political Rookie. Or How Barack Obama Left John Boehner Holding the Teabag, Again.
Monday, August 01, 2011
Paul Krugman is a political rookie. At least he is when compared to President Obama. That's why he unleashed a screed as soon as word came about the debt ceiling compromise between President Obama and Congressional leaders - to, you know, avert an economic 9/11. Joining the ideologue spheres' pure, fanatic, indomitable hysteria, Krugman declares the deal a disaster - both political and economic - of course providing no evidence for the latter, which I find curious for this Nobel winning economist. He rides the coattails of the simplistic argument that spending cuts - any spending cuts - are bad for a fragile economy, ignoring wholeheartedly his own previous cheerleading for cutting, say, defense spending. But that was back in the day - all the way back in April of this year.
Monday, August 01, 2011
Paul Krugman is a political rookie. At least he is when compared to President Obama. That's why he unleashed a screed as soon as word came about the debt ceiling compromise between President Obama and Congressional leaders - to, you know, avert an economic 9/11. Joining the ideologue spheres' pure, fanatic, indomitable hysteria, Krugman declares the deal a disaster - both political and economic - of course providing no evidence for the latter, which I find curious for this Nobel winning economist. He rides the coattails of the simplistic argument that spending cuts - any spending cuts - are bad for a fragile economy, ignoring wholeheartedly his own previous cheerleading for cutting, say, defense spending. But that was back in the day - all the way back in April of this year.
http://www.thepeoplesview.net/2011/08/paul-krugman-is-political-rookie-or-how.html
The "screed" was Krugman's column about the debt ceiling dealing, pointing out that slashing spending was bad news in a depressed economy. According to "The People's View", that amounted to "pure, fanatic, indomitable hysteria".
But hey, lest Spandan C be accused of being an "Obot", let's recall this 2007 gem:
Obama Lost My Vote - General Election, Too
Lest you think this is because I was personally offended as a gay man, you are right. But it wasn't only because of that that I made this decision. I draw the line in the sand when politicians pander to any group and sacrifice their stated goals of equal dignity under law and associate themselves, willingly, with known bigots of any kind, be they racists, sexists or homophobes. This is such a line. Obama has crossed it. Good riddance, Barack Obama.
You say that while you disagree with McClurkin's position, you would not exclude him because many African Americans believe the same as he does. Well, isn't your job as a leader to lead for justice and against those bigotries? That is a pathetic excuse, Senator, and you know it. You are trying to claim that a big tent has to include bigotry, and that is preposterous. And so, I have come to a decision. And that decision is that I cannot vote for you, and not just in the Democratic primary. I cannot vote for you in the general election either - even if you become the Democratic nominee for President. I cannot - I will not - support a candidate who knowingly promotes a homophobic religious figure on his campaign platform.
Lest you think this is because I was personally offended as a gay man, you are right. But it wasn't only because of that that I made this decision. I draw the line in the sand when politicians pander to any group and sacrifice their stated goals of equal dignity under law and associate themselves, willingly, with known bigots of any kind, be they racists, sexists or homophobes. This is such a line. Obama has crossed it. Good riddance, Barack Obama.
http://www.thepeoplesview.net/2007/10/obama-lost-my-vote-general-election-too.html?m=0
Let's just say that IMO this guy might as well send in his application to replace Chris Matthews once Tweety goes into semi-retirement. Can be fun, but there ain't a whole lot of substance on display (though he's got a better imitation of it than Tweety).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
145 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Black Helicopter Left and Its Disconnect from the Constitution [View all]
michigandem58
Aug 2013
OP
Ah so now we are racist randroid obama hating Black Helicopter Leftists.
Warren Stupidity
Aug 2013
#1
It has become increasingly comical how far the Regan Democrats will go
R. Daneel Olivaw
Aug 2013
#38
82% of REAL Liberal Democrats approve of President Obama's job as president; therefore
Pretzel_Warrior
Aug 2013
#69
ok. let's bias it downward and say only 72% of liberal Democrats agree. Even accounting for error
Pretzel_Warrior
Aug 2013
#80
A quick glance over that site's front page makes it clear who is the agenda-driven nut. /nt
Marr
Aug 2013
#2
"not through handicapping law enforcement" - "a policeman's job is only easy in a police state." n/t
PoliticAverse
Aug 2013
#3
Haha, asshole blogging from mom's basement represents "the people's view"
whatchamacallit
Aug 2013
#5
So, if all of what Snowden revealed is "..legal, Constitutional,.." etc, why is he being pursued?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Aug 2013
#9
FalconAir...a blast from the past (approximately 19 Friedman Units ago)
DisgustipatedinCA
Aug 2013
#109
"Pragmatic" is a good term for you to hang on yourself, given its archaic definition... nt
Pholus
Aug 2013
#27
You know, I've only ever seen the "don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good" argument
winter is coming
Aug 2013
#89
That is an extremist website, filled with posters who have been banned from other legitimate
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#26
I would think that statement would have had more significance to Franklin's slaves.
randome
Aug 2013
#44
And yet he still did it. Still spoke up about it. Joined other abolitionists.
R. Daneel Olivaw
Aug 2013
#59
Are you opposed to Constiutional Rights for the American people?? That appears to be what
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#72
Which has nothing to do with the centuries old laws and social philosophy which is what
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#70
Same guy, 2011: "Joining the ideologue spheres' pure, fanatic, indomitable hysteria, Krugman... "
JHB
Aug 2013
#53
Yeah Michigandem58, damn those "pesky liberals", the third way is the best way!
AZ Progressive
Aug 2013
#54
The one-man blog just drifts more and more rightward. And it's the U.S. Government's disconnect
villager
Aug 2013
#58
The creator of the site and many of its members gained the reputation of 'troll' over their years
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#78
It's in alignment with the 80% of liberal Democrats who support President Obama
michigandem58
Aug 2013
#85
I've seen this poll number nonesense used by the diehards to blindly justify anything that
R. Daneel Olivaw
Aug 2013
#91
"the government's legal, legitimate power to conduct surveillance" <-- NOT! ~eom
99th_Monkey
Aug 2013
#68
The writer of this article is blind to how things really work in 21st Century America
PorridgeGun
Aug 2013
#74
HAHAHA! "Black Helicopter Left" akin to "Far Left" cuz there just isnt enough "OOMPH!" in "Far Left"
burnodo
Aug 2013
#97
The other poster above noted that you're hounding other folks in this thread
Cali_Democrat
Aug 2013
#129
"handicapping law enforcement"? You mean, like not letting the DEA lie in court about NSA evidence?
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2013
#120
You're posting a by piece somone who didn't even vote for Obama in the first place?
Fumesucker
Aug 2013
#121
Legal, Constitutional, and Congress and court-supervised, no abuse, illegality, negligence or fraud?
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2013
#139
The author of this article could care less about have a frank conversation
LostOne4Ever
Aug 2013
#142