Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Fukushima - they are planning to move fuel rods from the hottest spent storage pool in Nov. (scary) [View all]FBaggins
(28,706 posts)54. Even more hilarious... keep 'em coming.
Again.... no pics showing the pool #4 in depth, showing the conditions of the rods therein.
The rods are in bundles that are themselves enclosed within racks. If you could see the fuel rods, that would be evidence that something had happened. The fact that they're sitting right where they started proves that they didn't melt down (which wouldn't have been physically possible knowing what we know now - that the pool is intact).
Looking at the webcams one can see the heat signatures of the reactors/pools rising in the air. Given the right humidity and temperatures a nice radioactive fog forms.
Humidity and temperature produce radiation now? What you mean is that you imagine that it's radioactive... but we've already seen how far afield your imagination takes you sometimes... haven't we? Hey! Here's comes one now!
And there is the idea that the melted cores having burned down into the ground are acting like geysers which burp on occasion as geysers are wont to do.
Such "ideas" must be chemically-induced or from a dream state... Because they certainly aren't the result of scientific inquiry. All of the evidence to date says that 99%+ (probably > 99.9%) of the cores are either within the RPVs or on the floor of the primary containments. The most comprehensive simulation that I've seen implied that the corium in the worst-melted unit burned about 1/3 of the way (inches) through the first layer of concrete above the steel bottom of the contanment vessel (which is then above 25 additional feet of concrete).
The rods are in bundles that are themselves enclosed within racks. If you could see the fuel rods, that would be evidence that something had happened. The fact that they're sitting right where they started proves that they didn't melt down (which wouldn't have been physically possible knowing what we know now - that the pool is intact).
Looking at the webcams one can see the heat signatures of the reactors/pools rising in the air. Given the right humidity and temperatures a nice radioactive fog forms.
Humidity and temperature produce radiation now? What you mean is that you imagine that it's radioactive... but we've already seen how far afield your imagination takes you sometimes... haven't we? Hey! Here's comes one now!
And there is the idea that the melted cores having burned down into the ground are acting like geysers which burp on occasion as geysers are wont to do.
Such "ideas" must be chemically-induced or from a dream state... Because they certainly aren't the result of scientific inquiry. All of the evidence to date says that 99%+ (probably > 99.9%) of the cores are either within the RPVs or on the floor of the primary containments. The most comprehensive simulation that I've seen implied that the corium in the worst-melted unit burned about 1/3 of the way (inches) through the first layer of concrete above the steel bottom of the contanment vessel (which is then above 25 additional feet of concrete).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Fukushima - they are planning to move fuel rods from the hottest spent storage pool in Nov. (scary) [View all]
progree
Aug 2013
OP
All spent fuel rods have plutonium in them - during fission, some of the uranium captures neutrons
progree
Aug 2013
#8
Yup, that's why they are worried - better to TRY to get this done now rather than later
progree
Aug 2013
#9
Funny, it's on Reuter's front page RIGHT NOW, but it's NOT "late breaking news" per DU? go figger.
nilram
Aug 2013
#15
There was (still is?) an official advisory to US citizens to not stay for more than a year
Art_from_Ark
Aug 2013
#45
Of course, transporting such hazardous materials by truck would not be so safe,
Art_from_Ark
Aug 2013
#44
No, I'm not saying. Reuters is saying, based on the people they interviewed
magical thyme
Aug 2013
#62