Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 11:36 PM Aug 2013

WAPO: NSA broke privacy rules thousands of times per year, audit finds [View all]

The National Security Agency has broken privacy rules or overstepped its legal authority thousands of times each year since Congress granted the agency broad new powers in 2008, according to an internal audit and other top-secret documents.

Most of the infractions involve unauthorized surveillance of Americans or foreign intelligence targets in the United States, both of which are restricted by statute and executive order. They range from significant violations of law to typographical errors that resulted in unintended interception of U.S. e-mails and telephone calls.

The documents, provided earlier this summer to The Washington Post by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, include a level of detail and analysis that is not routinely shared with Congress or the special court that oversees surveillance. In one of the documents, agency personnel are instructed to remove details and substitute more generic language in reports to the Justice Department and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

In one instance, the NSA decided that it need not report the unintended surveillance of Americans. A notable example in 2008 was the interception of a “large number” of calls placed from Washington when a programming error confused the U.S. area code 202 for 20, the international dialing code for Egypt, according to a “quality assurance” review that was not distributed to the NSA’s oversight staff.

http://m.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/nsa-broke-privacy-rules-thousands-of-times-per-year-audit-finds/2013/08/15/3310e554-05ca-11e3-a07f-49ddc7417125_story.html

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wow, wonder if some of "unintended" surveillance was committed by Snowden since he could even Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #1
Lol so everything is good, just Snowden violations? dkf Aug 2013 #2
You need to read the post again and then reply. Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #9
You only show your desperation with comments like that. If you want to chose to side rhett o rick Aug 2013 #5
I am not desperate so it must cause desperation for you. Again you are on your merry-go-round, Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #10
The OP was about the NSA and your comment was about Snowden. Those that rhett o rick Aug 2013 #12
Are you saying Snowden could not have been part of the 39% who did not follow standard operating Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #14
Whether he was truthful or not, whether he inadvertently surveilled or not have rhett o rick Aug 2013 #15
If is not important that he may be a part of this number who did not follow standard operating Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #16
Let me guess your point. Because Snowden might have been involved in the rhett o rick Aug 2013 #17
Is it Booz-Allen/NSA violating our Constitution or is it workers violating the Constitution. Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #19
Do I hear you saying that Constitutional violation responsibility goes no higher than the rhett o rick Aug 2013 #22
In the subject of the original post of audits speaks of operator errors, who are the operators, this Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #24
If I was running a company, I wouldnt let my workers commit the "operator errors" that you rhett o rick Aug 2013 #25
It is impossible to keep workers from making errors, if you have ever had a typo then you have made Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #26
I agree that typos are errors and it's hard to eliminate all errors. However, if a large number of rhett o rick Aug 2013 #28
Do you know if warrants have been issued without meeting strict requirements? No, you do not. Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #29
There is still a lot that neither you nor I know. We have seen at least one rhett o rick Aug 2013 #30
Did you know there are Congressional committees which receive reports ? Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #31
that "unintended surveillance" example = a limited hangout. grasswire Aug 2013 #3
Limited hangout - definition... dkf Aug 2013 #4
"Oh yes, that's a rabbit hole after all. No need to dig DirkGently Aug 2013 #7
example: Bush's famous "16 words". grasswire Aug 2013 #8
'according to a “quality assurance” review'... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #6
^ Wilms Aug 2013 #11
Unintended surveillance is like unintended death of those standing near a suspect. nm rhett o rick Aug 2013 #13
K & R !!! WillyT Aug 2013 #18
K&R woo me with science Aug 2013 #20
Blue links to dozens of 2 week old stories are about to make an appearance! n-t Logical Aug 2013 #21
Kinda like a burgler saying that he was after your jewels and "inadvertently" picked up your wallet. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2013 #23
When this thing blows, it's going to blow big. Wow. n/t Catherina Aug 2013 #27
Kick! Logical Aug 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WAPO: NSA broke privacy ...