Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
4. Limited hangout - definition...
Fri Aug 16, 2013, 12:12 AM
Aug 2013

A limited hangout, or partial hangout, is a public relations or propaganda technique that involves the release of previously hidden information in order to prevent a greater exposure of more important details.

It takes the form of deception, misdirection, or coverup often associated with intelligence agencies involving a release or "mea culpa" type of confession of only part of a set of previously hidden sensitive information, that establishes credibility for the one releasing the information who by the very act of confession appears to be "coming clean" and acting with integrity; but in actuality, by withholding key facts, is protecting a deeper operation and those who could be exposed if the whole truth came out. In effect, if an array of offenses or misdeeds is suspected, this confession admits to a lesser offense while covering up the greater ones.

A limited hangout typically is a response to lower the pressure felt from inquisitive investigators pursuing clues that threaten to expose everything, and the disclosure is often combined with red herrings or propaganda elements that lead to false trails, distractions, or ideological disinformation; thus allowing covert or criminal elements to continue in their improper activities.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_hangout

Looks about right.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wow, wonder if some of "unintended" surveillance was committed by Snowden since he could even Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #1
Lol so everything is good, just Snowden violations? dkf Aug 2013 #2
You need to read the post again and then reply. Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #9
You only show your desperation with comments like that. If you want to chose to side rhett o rick Aug 2013 #5
I am not desperate so it must cause desperation for you. Again you are on your merry-go-round, Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #10
The OP was about the NSA and your comment was about Snowden. Those that rhett o rick Aug 2013 #12
Are you saying Snowden could not have been part of the 39% who did not follow standard operating Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #14
Whether he was truthful or not, whether he inadvertently surveilled or not have rhett o rick Aug 2013 #15
If is not important that he may be a part of this number who did not follow standard operating Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #16
Let me guess your point. Because Snowden might have been involved in the rhett o rick Aug 2013 #17
Is it Booz-Allen/NSA violating our Constitution or is it workers violating the Constitution. Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #19
Do I hear you saying that Constitutional violation responsibility goes no higher than the rhett o rick Aug 2013 #22
In the subject of the original post of audits speaks of operator errors, who are the operators, this Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #24
If I was running a company, I wouldnt let my workers commit the "operator errors" that you rhett o rick Aug 2013 #25
It is impossible to keep workers from making errors, if you have ever had a typo then you have made Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #26
I agree that typos are errors and it's hard to eliminate all errors. However, if a large number of rhett o rick Aug 2013 #28
Do you know if warrants have been issued without meeting strict requirements? No, you do not. Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #29
There is still a lot that neither you nor I know. We have seen at least one rhett o rick Aug 2013 #30
Did you know there are Congressional committees which receive reports ? Thinkingabout Aug 2013 #31
that "unintended surveillance" example = a limited hangout. grasswire Aug 2013 #3
Limited hangout - definition... dkf Aug 2013 #4
"Oh yes, that's a rabbit hole after all. No need to dig DirkGently Aug 2013 #7
example: Bush's famous "16 words". grasswire Aug 2013 #8
'according to a “quality assurance” review'... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #6
^ Wilms Aug 2013 #11
Unintended surveillance is like unintended death of those standing near a suspect. nm rhett o rick Aug 2013 #13
K & R !!! WillyT Aug 2013 #18
K&R woo me with science Aug 2013 #20
Blue links to dozens of 2 week old stories are about to make an appearance! n-t Logical Aug 2013 #21
Kinda like a burgler saying that he was after your jewels and "inadvertently" picked up your wallet. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2013 #23
When this thing blows, it's going to blow big. Wow. n/t Catherina Aug 2013 #27
Kick! Logical Aug 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WAPO: NSA broke privacy ...»Reply #4