Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
3. They could just be prudently protecting her finances.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 02:00 PM
Feb 2012

If she has a 401k she might own shares in the company. As she would be a partial owner the company has a fiduciary responsibility to not let her harm her own holdings in any way.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»W. Pa. Tests Show Possibl...»Reply #3