Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "What if the president lied to us?" (Salon) [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)6. What if
For these statements to just be inaccurate and not be deliberate, calculated lies it would mean that the president 1) made his declarative statement to CBS even though he didnt know the FISA court was secret (despite knowing all about the FISA court 6 years ago); 2) made his declarative statement to NBC but somehow didnt see any of the news coverage of the Snowden disclosures proving the existence of domestic spying and 3) made his sweeping actually abusing statement somehow not knowing that his own administration previously admitted the NSA had abused its power, and worse, made his statement without bothering to look at the NSA audit report that Gellman revealed today.
So sure, I guess its possible Obama has merely been wrong but has not been lying. But the implications of that would be just as bad albeit in a different way as if he were deliberately lying. It would mean that he is making sweeping and wildly inaccurate statements without bothering to find out if they are actually true. Worse, for him merely to be wrong but not deliberately lying, it would mean that he didnt know the most basic facts about how his own administration runs. It would, in other words, mean he is so totally out of the loop on absolutely everything even the public news cycle that he has no idea whats going on.
I, of course, dont buy that at all. I dont buy that a constitutional lawyer and legal scholar didnt know that the FISA court is secret aka the opposite of transparent. I dont buy that he simply didnt see any of the news showing that spying is happening in the United States. And I dont buy that he didnt know that there is evidence both public and inside his own administration of the NSA actually abusing its power.
I dont buy any of that because, to say the least, it makes no sense. I just dont buy that hes so unaware of the world around him that he made such statements from a position of pure ignorance. On top of that, he has a motive. Yes, Obama has an obvious political interest in trying to hide as much of his administrations potentially illegal behavior as possible, which means he has an incentive to calculatedly lie. For all of these reasons, it seems safe to suggest that when it comes to the NSA situation, the president seems to be lying.
So sure, I guess its possible Obama has merely been wrong but has not been lying. But the implications of that would be just as bad albeit in a different way as if he were deliberately lying. It would mean that he is making sweeping and wildly inaccurate statements without bothering to find out if they are actually true. Worse, for him merely to be wrong but not deliberately lying, it would mean that he didnt know the most basic facts about how his own administration runs. It would, in other words, mean he is so totally out of the loop on absolutely everything even the public news cycle that he has no idea whats going on.
I, of course, dont buy that at all. I dont buy that a constitutional lawyer and legal scholar didnt know that the FISA court is secret aka the opposite of transparent. I dont buy that he simply didnt see any of the news showing that spying is happening in the United States. And I dont buy that he didnt know that there is evidence both public and inside his own administration of the NSA actually abusing its power.
I dont buy any of that because, to say the least, it makes no sense. I just dont buy that hes so unaware of the world around him that he made such statements from a position of pure ignorance. On top of that, he has a motive. Yes, Obama has an obvious political interest in trying to hide as much of his administrations potentially illegal behavior as possible, which means he has an incentive to calculatedly lie. For all of these reasons, it seems safe to suggest that when it comes to the NSA situation, the president seems to be lying.
...he didn't?
On the NSA, this is what happens when reports conflate the Bush and Obama administrations.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023471576
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That's how all politicians and CEOs get away with it. Because we can't know for sure
liberal_at_heart
Aug 2013
#7
And there are so very many. It's only Obama's fault. Don't blame the bullshit callers! n/t
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#23
Things such as the TPP should have everyone's hair on fire but no. Anyhoo,
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2013
#31
If Obama says the sky is blue bashers, wingers and fudr will say he's lying. He's a politician
uponit7771
Aug 2013
#15
We're supposed to be happy that his lies are small relative to others' lies?
DisgustipatedinCA
Aug 2013
#17
Right, I would like the president to tell the truth to his political enemies and national enemies
uponit7771
Aug 2013
#18
The article takes as given that Obama has said false things and gives two choices.
BlueCheese
Aug 2013
#34