General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "What if the president lied to us?" (Salon) [View all]KoKo
(84,711 posts)When that was posted here...there were some DU'ers who thought that having Govt. feed us disinformation was a positive thing. That it shouldn't be seen as disinfo...but, information we give to foreign countries to keep them aware of our policies. "Voice of America" to compete with CNN/MSNBC.
-------From the Hastings Article----
The tweak to the bill would essentially neutralize two previous actsthe Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 and Foreign Relations Authorization Act in 1987that had been passed to protect U.S. audiences from our own governments misinformation campaigns.
The bi-partisan amendment is sponsored by Rep. Mac Thornberry from Texas and Rep. Adam Smith from Washington State.
In a little noticed press release earlier in the week buried beneath the other high-profile issues in the $642 billion defense bill, including indefinite detention and a prohibition on gay marriage at military installations Thornberry warned that in the Internet age, the current law ties the hands of Americas diplomatic officials, military, and others by inhibiting our ability to effectively communicate in a credible way.
The bills supporters say the informational material used overseas to influence foreign audiences is too good to not use at home, and that new techniques are needed to help fight Al-Qaeda, a borderless enemy whose own propaganda reaches Americans online.
Critics of the bill say there are ways to keep America safe without turning the massive information operations apparatus within the federal government against American citizens.